Australian Politics Forum - Worse Off Under Turnbull Parental Leave Cuts

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Worse Off Under Turnbull Parental Leave Cuts
Reply #45 - Jan 15^th, 2016 at 4:07pm

John Smith wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 3:25pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 8:46am:

John Smith wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:19pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 5:09pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 1:51pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 8:53am:

so crook, you think it is fair for ANYONE to double-dip on parental leave? why should public servants get TWO lots of leave when everyone else gets only one?

i'd love to see your logic.

Why was it only PS?

Many large companies have a PPL schemes, why single out government workers only?

Because it is the GOVERNMENT paying twice for the same person. they only pay once to a private individual. if their company also pays it that is their benefit, but there is no way a government should be paying THEIR employees twice.

so government employees shouldn't be allowed the same rights or benefits as offered to private sector employees?

VERY FEW private sector employees get it as well as PPL. there is only a few. but the poin t is that the government itself is currently paying it twice.

no , no ... you're trying to avoid answering the question by using some lame numbers excuse. You claimed there is no problem with companies paying PPL to someone already claiming it from the govt. as its a company decision but then cry about it when that company if govt. owned?

Grin

quick, put your garter belt back on, you did much better when you were wearing a dress.

because it is MY TAXES paying for it. TWICE.

now if a company I am a substantial shareholder in does it I might object again BECAUSE IT IS MY MONEY. but if it isnt my money and no one else complains, why shoudl you?

your problem is quite simple. your position on any and all topics is easy to deduce. If it is a liberal policy, you will 100% oppose it no matter what. and vice versa.

you havent seriously considered any topic... probably ever.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 150690 Gender:	Re: Worse Off Under Turnbull Parental Leave Cuts Reply #46 - Jan 15^th, 2016 at 4:29pm longweekend58 wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 4:07pm: because it is MY TAXES paying for it. . You don't pay taxes.
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

Maqqa Gold Member Offline 14% - that low?! Posts: 16000	Re: Worse Off Under Turnbull Parental Leave Cuts Reply #47 - Jan 15^th, 2016 at 4:30pm If we are worse off under Turnbull - what's the alternative? Mr 14% - Shorten?
Back to top	Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 150690 Gender:	Re: Worse Off Under Turnbull Parental Leave Cuts Reply #48 - Jan 15^th, 2016 at 4:31pm Maqqa wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 4:30pm: If we are worse off under Turnbull - what's the alternative? Mr 14% - Shorten? Yes. Sad, but true.
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Worse Off Under Turnbull Parental Leave Cuts
Reply #49 - Jan 15^th, 2016 at 4:45pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 15^th, 2016 at 4:07pm: