Was this the same Muslims who want cameras in mosques?
Lafayette wrote on Dec 24
th, 2015 at 9:55am:
freediver wrote on Dec 24
th, 2015 at 9:38am:
So the terrorists were created by our interference in the middle east (and have nothing to do with Islam), and the solution is to interfere in the middle east?
Islam is primarily used by terrorist organizations to encourage and motivate their flocks to have no fear against a bigger and more technologically advanced army. However, the justifications used to commit terrorism are not based on Islam so much are they are based on political grievances with the West and the perceived wrongs that they feel have been committed against them by the West.
That is not as much the case with ISIL, where they have began to use Islam itself as the justification to fight against the West with the intention to impose a global caliphate on the world. This is very different than Al Qaeda and other organizations.
Though their justification for attacking civilians comes from their perception that the West is killing civilians in the swath of land that they essentially control.
Is that a yes? How should we interfere?
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 24
th, 2015 at 10:14am:
freediver wrote on Dec 24
th, 2015 at 9:35am:
Quote:Is a version of Islam I reject, obviously. Who do you think is more useful in bringing an end to Islamic terrorism FD - the muslim who campaigns for a peaceful Islam and denounces violence in its name - or the muslim who adheres to the "hateful warmongering" version? For some reason you insist on this double act of criticising the violent nature of Islam *AND* mocking the muslims who want to stop it.
False dichotomy.
The question is not a false dichotomy - I'd be interested in your answer.
Also you do criticise the violent nature of Islam and mock muslims who want to stop it. Not sure where the false dichotomy comes into it.
Sorry I assumed it was rhetorical. Do you want to know whether terrorists or anti-terrorists are more useful in fighting terrorism?
Quote:This is why I love the US, because protections were put in place by the Founding Fathers to prevent this whereas Australia doesn't have those protections.
Like the right to bear arms? How's that working out for you?