Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 9
Send Topic Print
Temperature Data Adjustment (Read 10827 times)
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21592
Gender: male
Temperature Data Adjustment
Nov 21st, 2015 at 2:12pm
 
'Ederer reports not long ago retired geologist and data computation expert Professor Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert began looking at the data behind the global warming claims, and especially the datasets of NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS).

Ewert painstakingly examined and tabulated the reams of archived data from 1153 stations that go back to 1881 – which NASA has publicly available – data that the UN IPCC uses to base its conclusion that man is heating the Earth’s atmosphere through the burning of fossil fuels. According to Ederer, what Professor Ewert found is “unbelievable”:

    From the publicly available data, Ewert made an unbelievable discovery: Between the years 2010 and 2012 the data measured since 1881 were altered so that they showed a significant warming, especially after 1950. […] A comparison of the data from 2010 with the data of 2012 shows that NASA-GISS had altered its own datasets so that especially after WWII a clear warming appears – although it never existed.”

' The 6 most often used methods were:

• Reducing the annual mean in the early phase.
• Reducing the high values in the first warming phase.
• Increasing individual values during the second warming phase.
• Suppression of the second cooling phase starting in 1995.
• Shortening the early decades of the datasets.
• With the long-term datasets, even the first century was shortened.

The methods were employed for stations such as Darwin, Australia and Palma de Mallorca, for example, where cooling trends were suddenly transformed into warming.'

- See more at: http://notrickszone.com/2015/11/20/german-professor-examines-nasa-giss-temperatu...
Available in the original German here-

http://www.achgut.com/dadgdx/index.php/dadgd/article/sind_die_klimadaten_manipul...

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
wiseguy
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 519
Gender: male
Re: Temperature Data Adjustment
Reply #1 - Nov 21st, 2015 at 2:19pm
 
No surprises there I guess. The "There is NO GLOBAL warming" denialists will be out in force.
Back to top
 

Muslims are murdering Psychopaths, just look at France, Never Trust a Mussey, Ever.
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Temperature Data Adjustment
Reply #2 - Dec 6th, 2015 at 10:17am
 
Th latest trick of the global warming deniers is to try and discredit the scientific data. This is despite the fact that most of the homogenized data has actually resulted in the raw temperatures being reduced.

What can't be disputed however  is the retreat of glaciers since 1850

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retreat_of_glaciers_since_1850

No matter how much the conservative press like to cherry pick data and argue semantics, photo graphic evidence of glacial retreat is unambiguous evidence that the earth is warming
Back to top
 

glacier.jpg (113 KB | 51 )
glacier.jpg

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Temperature Data Adjustment
Reply #3 - Dec 6th, 2015 at 10:21am
 
another retreating glacier
Back to top
 

saskatchewan.jpg (50 KB | 39 )
saskatchewan.jpg

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 122308
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Temperature Data Adjustment
Reply #4 - Dec 6th, 2015 at 10:37am
 
Notice the picture above were taken before the new Ice Age started in 2014?


forgiven

namaste
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Temperature Data Adjustment
Reply #5 - Dec 6th, 2015 at 10:53am
 
What Ice Age? 2015 is the hottest year on record.
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 122308
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Temperature Data Adjustment
Reply #6 - Dec 6th, 2015 at 10:56am
 
Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 6th, 2015 at 10:53am:
What Ice Age? 2015 is the hottest year on record.




You didn't see my thread on the mini Ice Age with over
250 videos of supporting evidence including graphs & links
to science papers?

forgiven

namaste
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21592
Gender: male
Re: Temperature Data Adjustment
Reply #7 - Dec 6th, 2015 at 11:23am
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Dec 6th, 2015 at 10:17am:
Th latest trick of the global warming deniers is to try and discredit the scientific data. This is despite the fact that most of the homogenized data has actually resulted in the raw temperatures being reduced.

What can't be disputed however  is the retreat of glaciers since 1850

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retreat_of_glaciers_since_1850

No matter how much the conservative press like to cherry pick data and argue semantics, photo graphic evidence of glacial retreat is unambiguous evidence that the earth is warming



Yes, the science says some glaciers are shrinking, some are growing and some are static.

'The UN's climate science body has admitted that a claim made in its 2007 report - that Himalayan glaciers could melt away by 2035 - was unfounded.

The admission today followed a New Scientist article last week that revealed the source of the claim made in the 2007 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was not peer-reviewed scientific literature – but a media interview with a scientist conducted in 1999. Several senior scientists have now said the claim was unrealistic and that the large Himalayan glaciers could not melt in a few decades.'

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/jan/20/ipcc-himalayan-glaciers-mista...

But I thought the IPCC only used peer reviewed science.

'Top Indian physicists have concluded Himalayan glaciers show little sign of retreat – in one of the largest studies of its type ever carried out.

I. M. Bahuguna et al, publishing in Current Science [PDF, issue index], studied changes to 2,000 glaciers in various Himalayan regions between 2001 to 2011. They conclude that 1,700 were stable, showing the same surface area and no change of direction.

248 glaciers exhibited a retreat, and 18 an advance. The scientists estimate a net loss of glacier area of about 10,000 km2 – that's a 0.2 per cent decrease (+/- 2.5pc), and an average retreat of 2.1 metres annually.'

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/05/13/indian_boffins_himalayan_glaciers_are_no...

the referred paper -
http://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/106/07/1008.pdf
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Temperature Data Adjustment
Reply #8 - Dec 6th, 2015 at 11:47am
 
lee wrote on Dec 6th, 2015 at 11:23am:
248 glaciers exhibited a retreat, and 18 an advance. The scientists estimate a net loss of glacier area of about 10,000 km2 – that's a 0.2 per cent decrease (+/- 2.5pc), and an average retreat of 2.1 metres annually.'



So you are now quoting data that contradicts your OP and supports the fact that the earth is warming with more than 90% of glaciers retreating.
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
Stratos
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4725
Re: Temperature Data Adjustment
Reply #9 - Dec 6th, 2015 at 11:53am
 
lee wrote on Dec 6th, 2015 at 11:23am:
Yes, the science says some glaciers are shrinking, some are growing and some are static.


Well that's pretty disingenuous:

Quote:
(0.9%) of them exhibited advancement of snout.
Grin Grin

I'm more curious as to why you think there would be any substantial difference in glaciers between 2001 and 2011, when surface temperatures have remained fairly stable during that time period?
Back to top
 

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15th, 2014 at 11:24pm:
Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Temperature Data Adjustment
Reply #10 - Dec 6th, 2015 at 12:31pm
 
wiseguy wrote on Nov 21st, 2015 at 2:19pm:
No surprises there I guess. The "There is NO GLOBAL warming" denialists will be out in force.

And they will be correct in their assertions that the cool the past and warm the present fraud is well and truly happening.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Temperature Data Adjustment
Reply #11 - Dec 6th, 2015 at 12:32pm
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Dec 6th, 2015 at 10:17am:
Th latest trick of the global warming deniers is to try and discredit the scientific data. This is despite the fact that most of the homogenized data has actually resulted in the raw temperatures being reduced.

What can't be disputed however  is the retreat of glaciers since 1850

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retreat_of_glaciers_since_1850

No matter how much the conservative press like to cherry pick data and argue semantics, photo graphic evidence of glacial retreat is unambiguous evidence that the earth is warming

Climate shifts. Always has always will. In fact in line with that, is that there are losses in parts and gains in other parts of ice extent and of ice gain.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Stratos
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4725
Re: Temperature Data Adjustment
Reply #12 - Dec 6th, 2015 at 12:54pm
 
progressiveslol wrote on Dec 6th, 2015 at 12:32pm:
Climate shifts. Always has always will. In fact in line with that, is that there are losses in parts and gains in other parts of ice extent and of ice gain.



Yes it's all a nice even balance, despite the fact that Lee's own dataset (which is from a very small time frame) shows that less than a percent of glaciers are growing.
Back to top
 

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15th, 2014 at 11:24pm:
Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male
Re: Temperature Data Adjustment
Reply #13 - Dec 6th, 2015 at 12:59pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Dec 6th, 2015 at 10:56am:
Jovial Monk wrote on Dec 6th, 2015 at 10:53am:
What Ice Age? 2015 is the hottest year on record.




You didn't see my thread on the mini Ice Age with over
250 videos of supporting evidence including graphs & links
to science papers?

forgiven

namaste

I had a laugh at the crap you put up so solemnly. None of it counts, cherry picked data, no science.
Back to top
 

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21592
Gender: male
Re: Temperature Data Adjustment
Reply #14 - Dec 6th, 2015 at 3:01pm
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Dec 6th, 2015 at 11:47am:
lee wrote on Dec 6th, 2015 at 11:23am:
248 glaciers exhibited a retreat, and 18 an advance. The scientists estimate a net loss of glacier area of about 10,000 km2 – that's a 0.2 per cent decrease (+/- 2.5pc), and an average retreat of 2.1 metres annually.'



So you are now quoting data that contradicts your OP and supports the fact that the earth is warming with more than 90% of glaciers retreating.



lee wrote on Dec 6th, 2015 at 11:23am:
They conclude that 1,700 were stable, showing the same surface area and no change of direction.




Did you miss this bit?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 9
Send Topic Print