Raven wrote on Sep 24
th, 2015 at 4:20pm:
Stratos wrote on Sep 24
th, 2015 at 11:55am:
John_Taverner wrote on Sep 24
th, 2015 at 7:32am:
"Can Atheist claim insurance on Acts of God?"
Yes, seeing as it a legal definition which does not require the existence of any deities.
I also scandalously use the word "good" without believing in and gods.
Is atheism a non-prophet organisation?
lol.
There is a church around the corner from me with a big sign saying "OMG" which i think is pretty funny:).
issuevoter wrote on Sep 23
rd, 2015 at 4:30pm:
se these fingerprints are metaphoric, unless one thinks of God as an old man in the sky. Further, I have never thought that we are the highest form of consciousness in the universe. If so, its a pretty crumby universe. And I do not ridicule suggested theories on how reality works, unless they are patently childish as in the dogma of established religions. Phew!
If I may speak for you, it seems the order and detail you observe give you the sense that they are the work or intensions of . . . I don't want to put too many words in your mouth here, but it sound like the Intelligent Design concept.
I ridicule those who say they have the answer, not because I am an atheist or an agnostic, I am neither, but I ridicule their small-mindedness.
The only way humans actually see anything is through the laws of physics. Human beings strictly conform to those laws. You could say Physics is God, but that would not satisfy anyone. If God exists outside the laws of physics then the Intelligently Designed bits don't support anything other than conjecture. That conjecture is conceived in the mind of Humans limited by physics. I see the God concept as way too small and human to explain anything.
Its like that old conundrum, try to think of nothing. Of course it cannot be done because the mind works on concepts which are things.
I appreciate your phrasing those are indeed metaphorical fingerprints.
Rather than intelligent design i'm more of a holographic theory man(I wish the experiment testing it had been more conclusive) though the two theories do share many similarities.
I agree that the conventional vision of God in the clouds, the reason for all mysteries has passed(at least for those avoiding willfull ignorance).
I think its unfortunate that religion is so binary for many people. I myself am probably classified as an agnostic, but it shard to shake off twenty years of indoctrination. I never regretted learning the bible, its a great way to irritate those of excessive faith.
I would restate"physics is God" to "physics is a description of predictable behavior which may or may not be an intended aspect of creation".
Three word slogan that unwieldy mess!
If you believe that a higher power/intellect/being exists, but you reject conventional religious doctrine what would that classify you as? a spiritualist?
And what if you believe such a entity was non-interventionist and removed from us-you cease to be a spiritualist and sort of become undefinable.
That's what people should aim for- Undefinable religious beliefs. Keep everyone on their toes and thinking!