Australian Politics Forum - What the media isn't telling you Climate Change

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #15 - Aug 13^th, 2015 at 5:12pm

lee wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 4:15pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 1:45pm:

These lottery parameter values you worship can't seem to generate one single climate model that predicts declining or even static global temperatures as CO2 levels rise.

Design parameters do what the modeller wants,

.

really???

So that's why we dont have any climate modelling that predicts declining or static temperatures as CO2 levels rise in the earth's atmosphere???

Not a single fossil fuel funded scientist or organisation can rig up a Cooling or Static climate model.

I wonder why that is lee?

have you looked into it at all? Or are you just so full of hatred for the children of this world that you have closed your eyes and stuck your fingers in your ears?

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21590 Gender:	Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change Reply #16 - Aug 13^th, 2015 at 6:25pm Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 5:12pm: Not a single fossil fuel funded scientist or organisation can rig up a Cooling or Static climate model. They probably could - it would be just as scientific. Which is probably why they don't.
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #17 - Aug 13^th, 2015 at 6:28pm

lee wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 6:25pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 5:12pm:

Not a single fossil fuel funded scientist or organisation can rig up a Cooling or Static climate model.

They probably could - it would be just as scientific. Which is probably why they don't.

--> lee supports Abbotts embarrassing emissions targets why?

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #18 - Aug 13^th, 2015 at 11:41pm

lee wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 6:25pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 5:12pm:

Not a single fossil fuel funded scientist or organisation can rig up a Cooling or Static climate model.

They probably could - it would be just as scientific. Which is probably why they don't.

No - it just wouldnt pass the peer reviewed scientific process

Do you know what that process involves lee?

Have you heard of it before lee?

I can provide you with some very useful resources and study material so that you can get up to speed. (I still have my high school science class notes)

let me know if you wish to book some tutorials - my rates are expensive, but worthwhile lee

cheers mate

....oh, and well done

we are all very proud of your enormous work ethic and moral deceitfulness in this particular forum.

well done mate

Back to top

« Last Edit: Aug 13^th, 2015 at 11:48pm by Chimp_Logic »

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

Rider

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2669
OnTheRoad
Gender: male

Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #19 - Aug 15^th, 2015 at 6:33am

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 11:41pm:

lee wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 6:25pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 5:12pm:

Not a single fossil fuel funded scientist or organisation can rig up a Cooling or Static climate model.

They probably could - it would be just as scientific. Which is probably why they don't.

No - it just wouldnt pass the peer reviewed scientific process

Do you know what that process involves lee?

Have you heard of it before lee?

I can provide you with some very useful resources and study material so that you can get up to speed. (I still have my high school science class notes)

let me know if you wish to book some tutorials - my rates are expensive, but worthwhile lee

cheers mate

....oh, and well done

we are all very proud of your enormous work ethic and moral deceitfulness in this particular forum.

well done mate

Peer review is not a scientific process. Everything you say is lies. You are a fraud.

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #20 - Aug 15^th, 2015 at 1:18pm

Rider wrote on Aug 15^th, 2015 at 6:33am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 11:41pm:

lee wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 6:25pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 5:12pm:

Not a single fossil fuel funded scientist or organisation can rig up a Cooling or Static climate model.

They probably could - it would be just as scientific. Which is probably why they don't.

No - it just wouldnt pass the peer reviewed scientific process

Do you know what that process involves lee?

Have you heard of it before lee?

I can provide you with some very useful resources and study material so that you can get up to speed. (I still have my high school science class notes)

let me know if you wish to book some tutorials - my rates are expensive, but worthwhile lee

cheers mate

....oh, and well done

we are all very proud of your enormous work ethic and moral deceitfulness in this particular forum.

well done mate

Peer review is not a scientific process. Everything you say is lies. You are a fraud.

Why is peer review not a scientific process?

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21590 Gender:	Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change Reply #21 - Aug 15^th, 2015 at 3:07pm BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Aug 15^th, 2015 at 1:18pm: Why is peer review not a scientific process? I remind you once again of Karl et al, a pal peer reviewed paper.
Back to top	IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #22 - Aug 15^th, 2015 at 6:45pm

Rider wrote on Aug 15^th, 2015 at 6:33am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 11:41pm:

lee wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 6:25pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 5:12pm:

Not a single fossil fuel funded scientist or organisation can rig up a Cooling or Static climate model.

They probably could - it would be just as scientific. Which is probably why they don't.

No - it just wouldnt pass the peer reviewed scientific process

Do you know what that process involves lee?

Have you heard of it before lee?

I can provide you with some very useful resources and study material so that you can get up to speed. (I still have my high school science class notes)

let me know if you wish to book some tutorials - my rates are expensive, but worthwhile lee

cheers mate

....oh, and well done

we are all very proud of your enormous work ethic and moral deceitfulness in this particular forum.

well done mate

Peer review is not a scientific process. Everything you say is lies. You are a fraud.

Peer review is a critical part of the scientific process

You are confusing the overall scientific process with the scientific METHOD which scientists use to discover and analyse new phenomena. (an analogy would be a post graduate student having written up a PhD thesis. The thesis is sent to independent scientific experts in that specific field who determine its worthiness for admission into PhD-ness - the student must also defend their thesis before the examiners. This step will examine everything that was done in the PhD candidature and evaluate the validity of the results and conclusions made etc)

Think of the scientific peer review process as a final stage of validation (at that particular time of publication- of course science is littered with paradigm shifts and collapse of theories due to NEW ways of thinking and NEW data, observations and evidence.)

I thought you understood the basics of how science works as a profession.

Perhaps it explains why you are so confused about the high school levels science that underpins the FACT called AGW?

Back to top

« Last Edit: Aug 15^th, 2015 at 6:52pm by Chimp_Logic »

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

Rider

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2669
OnTheRoad
Gender: male

Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #23 - Aug 15^th, 2015 at 6:50pm

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 15^th, 2015 at 6:45pm:

Rider wrote on Aug 15^th, 2015 at 6:33am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 11:41pm:

lee wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 6:25pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 5:12pm:

Not a single fossil fuel funded scientist or organisation can rig up a Cooling or Static climate model.

They probably could - it would be just as scientific. Which is probably why they don't.

No - it just wouldnt pass the peer reviewed scientific process

Do you know what that process involves lee?

Have you heard of it before lee?

I can provide you with some very useful resources and study material so that you can get up to speed. (I still have my high school science class notes)

let me know if you wish to book some tutorials - my rates are expensive, but worthwhile lee

cheers mate

....oh, and well done

we are all very proud of your enormous work ethic and moral deceitfulness in this particular forum.

well done mate

Peer review is not a scientific process. Everything you say is lies. You are a fraud.

Peer review is a critical part of the scientific process

You are confusing the overall scientific process with the scientific METHOD which scientists use to discover and analyse new phenomena.

Think of the scientific peer review process as a final stage of validation (at that particular time of publication- of course science is littered with paradigm shifts and collapse of theories due to NEW ways of thinking and NEW data, observations and evidence.)

I thought you understood the basics of how science works as a profession.

Perhaps it explains why you are so confused about the high school levels science that underpins the FACT called AGW?
http://discovermagazine.com/~/media/import/images/b/e/b/chimpmedia.jpg

Wrong. Take your snake oil and go.

Back to top

IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #24 - Aug 15^th, 2015 at 6:55pm

Rider wrote on Aug 15^th, 2015 at 6:50pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 15^th, 2015 at 6:45pm:

Rider wrote on Aug 15^th, 2015 at 6:33am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 11:41pm:

lee wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 6:25pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 5:12pm:

Not a single fossil fuel funded scientist or organisation can rig up a Cooling or Static climate model.

They probably could - it would be just as scientific. Which is probably why they don't.

No - it just wouldnt pass the peer reviewed scientific process

Do you know what that process involves lee?

Have you heard of it before lee?

I can provide you with some very useful resources and study material so that you can get up to speed. (I still have my high school science class notes)

let me know if you wish to book some tutorials - my rates are expensive, but worthwhile lee

cheers mate

....oh, and well done

we are all very proud of your enormous work ethic and moral deceitfulness in this particular forum.

well done mate

Peer review is not a scientific process. Everything you say is lies. You are a fraud.

Peer review is a critical part of the scientific process

You are confusing the overall scientific process with the scientific METHOD which scientists use to discover and analyse new phenomena.

Think of the scientific peer review process as a final stage of validation (at that particular time of publication- of course science is littered with paradigm shifts and collapse of theories due to NEW ways of thinking and NEW data, observations and evidence.)

I thought you understood the basics of how science works as a profession.

Perhaps it explains why you are so confused about the high school levels science that underpins the FACT called AGW?
http://discovermagazine.com/~/media/import/images/b/e/b/chimpmedia.jpg

Wrong. Take your snake oil and go.

In comes Rider with his bigotry and ignorance and says "Wrong. Take your snake oil and go" without follow ups, validation or justification.

Rider exposed again as a crack pot rigth wing freak maggot who hates children and doesnt understand science

Well done Rider you stinkin freak maggot puppet clown sloth.

Great to have you back by the way - the stench in here was becoming barely acceptable for a short period of time.

Well done for re-stinkin the joint with your religious madness

cheers mate

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

Bobby. Moderator Offline Australian Politics Posts: 122278 Melbourne Gender:	Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change Reply #25 - Aug 15^th, 2015 at 7:47pm Dear Chimp, no one gives a monkeys bum about what you think:
Back to top	IP Logged

Chimp_Logic Gold Member Offline πολιτικός Posts: 4826 Mawson Base Gender:	Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change Reply #26 - Aug 15^th, 2015 at 7:49pm Bobby. wrote on Aug 15^th, 2015 at 7:47pm: Dear Chimp, no one gives a monkeys bum about what you think: http://images.stupidvideos.com/images/2/00/20/09/51/200951_m730_____1.jpg λολ
Back to top	Mini Ice Age (2014-2029) Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #27 - Aug 15^th, 2015 at 8:53pm

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 15^th, 2015 at 6:45pm:

Rider wrote on Aug 15^th, 2015 at 6:33am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 11:41pm:

lee wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 6:25pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 5:12pm:

Not a single fossil fuel funded scientist or organisation can rig up a Cooling or Static climate model.

They probably could - it would be just as scientific. Which is probably why they don't.

No - it just wouldnt pass the peer reviewed scientific process

Do you know what that process involves lee?

Have you heard of it before lee?

I can provide you with some very useful resources and study material so that you can get up to speed. (I still have my high school science class notes)

let me know if you wish to book some tutorials - my rates are expensive, but worthwhile lee

cheers mate

....oh, and well done

we are all very proud of your enormous work ethic and moral deceitfulness in this particular forum.

well done mate

Peer review is not a scientific process. Everything you say is lies. You are a fraud.

Peer review is a critical part of the scientific process

Actually, it is a 'critical part' of the PUBLISHING process.
Any article, book or story is reviewed or proof read before it goes to the printers. The reason science papers get 'peer' reviewed is so that the reviewers can have some idea of the subject matter.

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #28 - Aug 15^th, 2015 at 9:34pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 15^th, 2015 at 8:53pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 15^th, 2015 at 6:45pm:

Rider wrote on Aug 15^th, 2015 at 6:33am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 11:41pm:

lee wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 6:25pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 5:12pm:

Not a single fossil fuel funded scientist or organisation can rig up a Cooling or Static climate model.

They probably could - it would be just as scientific. Which is probably why they don't.

No - it just wouldnt pass the peer reviewed scientific process

Do you know what that process involves lee?

Have you heard of it before lee?

I can provide you with some very useful resources and study material so that you can get up to speed. (I still have my high school science class notes)

let me know if you wish to book some tutorials - my rates are expensive, but worthwhile lee

cheers mate

....oh, and well done

we are all very proud of your enormous work ethic and moral deceitfulness in this particular forum.

well done mate

Peer review is not a scientific process. Everything you say is lies. You are a fraud.

Peer review is a critical part of the scientific process

Actually, it is a 'critical part' of the PUBLISHING process.
Any article, book or story is reviewed or proof read before it goes to the printers. The reason science papers get 'peer' reviewed is so that the reviewers can have some idea of the subject matter.

really?

What is the peer review process for an article published in NATURE or the Journal of Physics, compared to say the Herald Sun, Readers Digest or Woman's Weekly?

Obviously your posts aren't peer reviewed

Are you embarrassed yet, or shall I continue?

Apologise and leave the premises forthwith you clown maggot right wing sloth puppet

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #29 - Aug 15^th, 2015 at 9:38pm

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 15^th, 2015 at 9:34pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Aug 15^th, 2015 at 8:53pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 15^th, 2015 at 6:45pm:

Rider wrote on Aug 15^th, 2015 at 6:33am:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 11:41pm:

lee wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 6:25pm:

Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13^th, 2015 at 5:12pm:

Not a single fossil fuel funded scientist or organisation can rig up a Cooling or Static climate model.

They probably could - it would be just as scientific. Which is probably why they don't.

No - it just wouldnt pass the peer reviewed scientific process

Do you know what that process involves lee?

Have you heard of it before lee?

I can provide you with some very useful resources and study material so that you can get up to speed. (I still have my high school science class notes)

let me know if you wish to book some tutorials - my rates are expensive, but worthwhile lee

cheers mate

....oh, and well done

we are all very proud of your enormous work ethic and moral deceitfulness in this particular forum.

well done mate

Peer review is not a scientific process. Everything you say is lies. You are a fraud.

Peer review is a critical part of the scientific process

Actually, it is a 'critical part' of the PUBLISHING process.
Any article, book or story is reviewed or proof read before it goes to the printers. The reason science papers get 'peer' reviewed is so that the reviewers can have some idea of the subject matter.

really?

What is the peer review process for an article published in NATURE or the Journal of Physics, compared to say the Herald Sun, Readers Digest or Woman's Weekly?

Obviously your posts aren't peer reviewed

The Herald Sun, Reader's Digest and the Woman's Weekly aren't 'Scholarly' publications, so they only use proof reading ( to make sure the words are correctly spelled etc)

"Scholarly peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field, before a paper describing this work is published in a journal or as a book. The peer review helps the publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief or the editorial board) deciding whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected. "

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged