Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 6
Send Topic Print
What the media isn't telling you Climate Change (Read 4442 times)
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 11070
Australia
Gender: male
What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Aug 9th, 2015 at 1:58pm
 
Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
MOTR
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6646
Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #1 - Aug 13th, 2015 at 12:21am
 
Can you identify the paper published by the first scientist denying climate change.

If you don't know you are a denier. A true skeptic will know.
Back to top
 

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."
 
IP Logged
 
Art Vandelay
Junior Member
**
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 55
Gender: male
Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #2 - Aug 13th, 2015 at 1:08am
 
There are very few scientists who dismiss the theory of greenhouse warming, however, within the science community there is a far more nuanced range of opinion than most people realize.

The Left media has rather successfully propagated a binary mentality on the issue.

Specifically:
1. greenhouse warming exists or it doesn't.
2. If it exists, it's dangerous, so we must act now to mitigate it.

Sure, 97% of climate scientists do accept that man is responsible for climate change but how many accept that it's dangerous?

It should be noted that the specified 2 degrees C above pre industrial temperature was actually promoted by an economist and not a scientist.

Of course the main area of conjecture among scientists is the specified (modeled) number for climate sensitivity.

There are several prominent scientists who believe that the actual value is below the range specified by IPCC. The level of uncertainty stems from the assigned magnitude and direction of feedbacks.    

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #3 - Aug 13th, 2015 at 2:02am
 
MOTR wrote on Aug 13th, 2015 at 12:21am:
Can you identify the paper published by the first scientist denying climate change.

If you don't know you are a denier. A true skeptic will know.

I've never heard such a put-down but it's a good one!

Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #4 - Aug 13th, 2015 at 2:06am
 
Art Vandelay wrote on Aug 13th, 2015 at 1:08am:
There are very few scientists who dismiss the theory of greenhouse warming, however, within the science community there is a far more nuanced range of opinion than most people realize.

The Left media has rather successfully propagated a binary mentality on the issue.

Specifically:
1. greenhouse warming exists or it doesn't.
2. If it exists, it's dangerous, so we must act now to mitigate it.

Sure, 97% of climate scientists do accept that man is responsible for climate change but how many accept that it's dangerous?

It should be noted that the specified 2 degrees C above pre industrial temperature was actually promoted by an economist and not a scientist.

Of course the main area of conjecture among scientists is the specified (modeled) number for climate sensitivity.

There are several prominent scientists who believe that the actual value is below the range specified by IPCC. The level of uncertainty stems from the assigned magnitude and direction of feedbacks.    


Unquantified argument: very,... ahem, convincing propaganda but for whom?

No one perhaps?  Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21590
Gender: male
Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #5 - Aug 13th, 2015 at 12:07pm
 
Art Vandelay wrote on Aug 13th, 2015 at 1:08am:
Of course the main area of conjecture among scientists is the specified (modeled) number for climate sensitivity.



And of course how ECS is calculated.

For instance, the climate models use a mixture of physics and parameterisation. Parameterisation is where the modellers don't know how something should be represented, and so insert a number to arrive at an answer. That number has a chance between zero and Buckley's of being correct. It is called an emergent number.

SKS and others skirt around that fact.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Chimp_Logic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male
Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #6 - Aug 13th, 2015 at 12:33pm
 
lee wrote on Aug 13th, 2015 at 12:07pm:
Art Vandelay wrote on Aug 13th, 2015 at 1:08am:
Of course the main area of conjecture among scientists is the specified (modeled) number for climate sensitivity.



And of course how ECS is calculated.

For instance, the climate models use a mixture of physics and parameterisation. Parameterisation is where the modellers don't know how something should be represented, and so insert a number to arrive at an answer. That number has a chance between zero and Buckley's of being correct. It is called an emergent number.

SKS and others skirt around that fact.


Actually that is not how values for parameters are arrived at.

Your lack of understanding of basic scientific and mathematical principles is astonishing to say the least.

Parameters and variables can have theoretical and/or experimental/analytical values for a pre determined set of of conditions and of course have a statistical uncertainty attached to them.

The only thing that is cherry picked out of thin air, is your delusional denialism and crack pot political rhetorical dogma

Apologise in writing for being exposed in public
Back to top
 

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #7 - Aug 13th, 2015 at 12:46pm
 
lee wrote on Aug 13th, 2015 at 12:07pm:
Art Vandelay wrote on Aug 13th, 2015 at 1:08am:
Of course the main area of conjecture among scientists is the specified (modeled) number for climate sensitivity.



And of course how ECS is calculated.

For instance, the climate models use a mixture of physics and parameterisation. Parameterisation is where the modellers don't know how something should be represented, and so insert a number to arrive at an answer. That number has a chance between zero and Buckley's of being correct. It is called an emergent number.

SKS and others skirt around that fact.

You are saying nothing should ever be experimented upon as correction of theory is not possible?

Please, tell us what your words mean because as your (ex-)main man says IDEAS LAST FOREVER Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

** DIVORCE IS SO MESSY: OH THE LIBBOS ALL THINK CLIVE HAS NO BRAINS ALL OF A SUDDEN  Grin Grin

Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21590
Gender: male
Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #8 - Aug 13th, 2015 at 12:55pm
 
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Aug 13th, 2015 at 12:46pm:
You are saying nothing should ever be experimented upon as correction of theory is not possible?



How much has ECS changed in 30 years of climate science? How many billions of dollars have been spent on a nil result.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21590
Gender: male
Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #9 - Aug 13th, 2015 at 12:57pm
 
Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13th, 2015 at 12:33pm:
Actually that is not how values for parameters are arrived at.



I know you will not deign to enlighten us, but it would assist.

I know you love wiki

'Parameterization in a weather or climate model within numerical weather prediction refers to the method of replacing processes that are too small-scale or complex to be physically represented in the model by a simplified process.'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parametrization_%28atmospheric_modeling%29

So tell me how do they arrive at these small scale or complex numbers?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #10 - Aug 13th, 2015 at 1:25pm
 
lee wrote on Aug 13th, 2015 at 12:55pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Aug 13th, 2015 at 12:46pm:
You are saying nothing should ever be experimented upon as correction of theory is not possible?



How much has ECS changed in 30 years of climate science? How many billions of dollars have been spent on a nil result.

You don't answer questions because you are always too busy asking them!

Lucky parliament has a question time where answers are required  Wink Wink
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #11 - Aug 13th, 2015 at 1:26pm
 
lee wrote on Aug 13th, 2015 at 12:57pm:
Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13th, 2015 at 12:33pm:
Actually that is not how values for parameters are arrived at.



I know you will not deign to enlighten us, but it would assist.

I know you love wiki

'Parameterization in a weather or climate model within numerical weather prediction refers to the method of replacing processes that are too small-scale or complex to be physically represented in the model by a simplified process.'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parametrization_%28atmospheric_modeling%29

So tell me how do they arrive at these small scale or complex numbers?

More questions.... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Chimp_Logic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male
Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #12 - Aug 13th, 2015 at 1:45pm
 
lee wrote on Aug 13th, 2015 at 12:57pm:
Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13th, 2015 at 12:33pm:
Actually that is not how values for parameters are arrived at.



I know you will not deign to enlighten us, but it would assist.

I know you love wiki

'Parameterization in a weather or climate model within numerical weather prediction refers to the method of replacing processes that are too small-scale or complex to be physically represented in the model by a simplified process.'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parametrization_%28atmospheric_modeling%29

So tell me how do they arrive at these small scale or complex numbers?


It's Amazing isnt it?

These lottery parameter values you worship can't seem to generate one single climate model that predicts declining or even static global temperatures  as CO2 levels rise.

Where is your climate model that supports your coal based mental derangement?
Back to top
 

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21590
Gender: male
Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #13 - Aug 13th, 2015 at 4:15pm
 
Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13th, 2015 at 1:45pm:
These lottery parameter values you worship can't seem to generate one single climate model that predicts declining or even static global temperatures  as CO2 levels rise.


Design parameters do what the modeller wants,

'The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible. '

http://ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg1/501.htm

So where do they depart reality? Oh that's right - they are tuned to roughly approximate the past, and then extrapolated forward.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: What the media isn't telling you Climate Change
Reply #14 - Aug 13th, 2015 at 4:46pm
 
lee wrote on Aug 13th, 2015 at 4:15pm:
Chimp_Logic wrote on Aug 13th, 2015 at 1:45pm:
These lottery parameter values you worship can't seem to generate one single climate model that predicts declining or even static global temperatures  as CO2 levels rise.


Design parameters do what the modeller wants,

'The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible. '

http://ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg1/501.htm

So where do they depart reality? Oh that's right - they are tuned to roughly approximate the past, and then extrapolated forward.

...lee is giving quotes from his sources out of context then trying to extend his own rationale from said out of context quotes.


Grin
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 6
Send Topic Print