Home Articles Forum Wiki Poll Garden Contact

 
 
 
  
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
 
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

  Australian Politics Forum › Member Run Boards › Environment › Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
(Moderators: Bobby., Sir_Bobby)
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 ... 33
Send Topic Print
Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS (Read 30728 times)
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 62097
Here
Gender: male
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #330 - May 25th, 2015 at 3:52pm  
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 3:19pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 2:54pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 2:32pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 11:59am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 24th, 2015 at 10:56pm:
So: you have NO idea then Grin Grin Grin Grin


i know Tony Abbott and the fascist liberal voters got caught trying to sell out the University of Western Australias global reputation to a (!global) political activist who wants to argue that fossil fuels should be allowed to warm our kids earth by 3 degrees instead of 2 and you can't pretend he didn't!

That's what I know buddy so bring it on fellla  Wink Wink

Tony Abbott and the liberal voters of Australia got publicly laughed at by the toffs themselves and told very publicly that this state of WA floats the nation so why don't you eat that one in question time until the election  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy




And so what is UWA's 'global reputation'?? A hot bed of deluded AGW alarmists?..If so 'selling out' their rep could only be a GOOD thing (it might introduce some balance to the debate on Global Warming/Climate Change/whatever the hell it's called this week).

And the actual 'effective' difference between 2 degrees C and 3 degrees C would be basically ZERO, for humans, and every other type of life on Earth.


Lomborg is probably much closer to accurate than the IPCC, Flannery, Gore, Mann and the rest of the catastrophic climate change believers will EVER be.


bro, light up the crack pipe again and get really bored why don't ya  Smiley


I'll leave that to you...an 'increase' of 6 degrees C..'MIGHT' be harmful to humans (and other life on Earth) but that's way more than even the real worst case scenarios.  2 degrees or even 3 degrees would only take the planet back to close to the temperatures that humans evolved in. Which is also what modern plants and animals also developed in.


an 'increase' of 6 degrees C..'MIGHT' be harmful to humans .

2 or 3 Deg is what they are saying we have already locked in. This type of increase is expected in the next 50 years or so. This isn't where it stops, its just the beginning. we keep increasing the CO2 output and that number will keep going up.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #331 - May 25th, 2015 at 4:06pm  
Dnarever wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 3:52pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 3:19pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 2:54pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 2:32pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 11:59am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 24th, 2015 at 10:56pm:
So: you have NO idea then Grin Grin Grin Grin


i know Tony Abbott and the fascist liberal voters got caught trying to sell out the University of Western Australias global reputation to a (!global) political activist who wants to argue that fossil fuels should be allowed to warm our kids earth by 3 degrees instead of 2 and you can't pretend he didn't!

That's what I know buddy so bring it on fellla  Wink Wink

Tony Abbott and the liberal voters of Australia got publicly laughed at by the toffs themselves and told very publicly that this state of WA floats the nation so why don't you eat that one in question time until the election  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy




And so what is UWA's 'global reputation'?? A hot bed of deluded AGW alarmists?..If so 'selling out' their rep could only be a GOOD thing (it might introduce some balance to the debate on Global Warming/Climate Change/whatever the hell it's called this week).

And the actual 'effective' difference between 2 degrees C and 3 degrees C would be basically ZERO, for humans, and every other type of life on Earth.


Lomborg is probably much closer to accurate than the IPCC, Flannery, Gore, Mann and the rest of the catastrophic climate change believers will EVER be.


bro, light up the crack pipe again and get really bored why don't ya  Smiley


I'll leave that to you...an 'increase' of 6 degrees C..'MIGHT' be harmful to humans (and other life on Earth) but that's way more than even the real worst case scenarios.  2 degrees or even 3 degrees would only take the planet back to close to the temperatures that humans evolved in. Which is also what modern plants and animals also developed in.


an 'increase' of 6 degrees C..'MIGHT' be harmful to humans .

2 or 3 Deg is what they are saying we have already locked in. This type of increase is expected in the next 50 years or so. This isn't where it stops, its just the beginning. we keep increasing the CO2 output and that number will keep going up.


And so what??? Do you really think that humans, as a species, will 'magically' cease to exist when the temperatures rise a bit?? And that's without even mentioning the various 'non-believer' science that says it may not even get close to 2 degrees?

Given our current level of technological skill, even 6 degrees possibly  wouldn't be very difficult for humans to survive. Sure we might have to eat tofu and yeast type foods, but we'd still survive until the pendulum swung back.
Back to top
 
"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #332 - May 25th, 2015 at 4:14pm  
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:06pm:
Dnarever wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 3:52pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 3:19pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 2:54pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 2:32pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 11:59am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 24th, 2015 at 10:56pm:
So: you have NO idea then Grin Grin Grin Grin


i know Tony Abbott and the fascist liberal voters got caught trying to sell out the University of Western Australias global reputation to a (!global) political activist who wants to argue that fossil fuels should be allowed to warm our kids earth by 3 degrees instead of 2 and you can't pretend he didn't!

That's what I know buddy so bring it on fellla  Wink Wink

Tony Abbott and the liberal voters of Australia got publicly laughed at by the toffs themselves and told very publicly that this state of WA floats the nation so why don't you eat that one in question time until the election  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy




And so what is UWA's 'global reputation'?? A hot bed of deluded AGW alarmists?..If so 'selling out' their rep could only be a GOOD thing (it might introduce some balance to the debate on Global Warming/Climate Change/whatever the hell it's called this week).

And the actual 'effective' difference between 2 degrees C and 3 degrees C would be basically ZERO, for humans, and every other type of life on Earth.


Lomborg is probably much closer to accurate than the IPCC, Flannery, Gore, Mann and the rest of the catastrophic climate change believers will EVER be.


bro, light up the crack pipe again and get really bored why don't ya  Smiley


I'll leave that to you...an 'increase' of 6 degrees C..'MIGHT' be harmful to humans (and other life on Earth) but that's way more than even the real worst case scenarios.  2 degrees or even 3 degrees would only take the planet back to close to the temperatures that humans evolved in. Which is also what modern plants and animals also developed in.


an 'increase' of 6 degrees C..'MIGHT' be harmful to humans .

2 or 3 Deg is what they are saying we have already locked in. This type of increase is expected in the next 50 years or so. This isn't where it stops, its just the beginning. we keep increasing the CO2 output and that number will keep going up.


And so what??? Do you really think that humans, as a species, will 'magically' cease to exist when the temperatures rise a bit?? And that's without even mentioning the various 'non-believer' science that says it may not even get close to 2 degrees?

Given our current level of technological skill, even 6 degrees possibly  wouldn't be very difficult for humans to survive. Sure we might have to eat tofu and yeast type foods, but we'd still survive until the pendulum swung back.

lol gizmo is playing guessing games with our kids futures and admitting to doing so otherwise he would be providing sources to back his excretement up !!

Has he never heard of complex systems ?!!?

He seems to think CO2 is the only limiting factor to plant growth and 3 degrees is no problem just because he said so... I mean: NOT EVEN THE BIGGEST CRACK HEAD THAT EVER LIVED
WOULD SAY SOMETHING THAT MESSED UP  Roll Eyes

Embarrassed Embarrassed Embarrassed Embarrassed Embarrassed Embarrassed Embarrassed Embarrassed Embarrassed Embarrassed Embarrassed

** go gizmo f'n lol  Cool
Back to top
 
*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21376
Gender: male
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #333 - May 25th, 2015 at 4:15pm  
Isn't that 2-3 deg per doubling? 278ppm in 1700, 576ppm for a doubling. Or Bill Mckibben's 350ppm doubles to 700ppm.

Although there now appears to be some doubt on that.

An increase on historical levels of 120.6, and since the end of 1996, an increase of 36.16. An increase of approximately 30%, but temperatures are running flat, according to the satellite data.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 25th, 2015 at 4:25pm by lee »  
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #334 - May 25th, 2015 at 4:18pm  
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:06pm:
Dnarever wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 3:52pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 3:19pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 2:54pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 2:32pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 11:59am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 24th, 2015 at 10:56pm:
So: you have NO idea then Grin Grin Grin Grin


i know Tony Abbott and the fascist liberal voters got caught trying to sell out the University of Western Australias global reputation to a (!global) political activist who wants to argue that fossil fuels should be allowed to warm our kids earth by 3 degrees instead of 2 and you can't pretend he didn't!

That's what I know buddy so bring it on fellla  Wink Wink

Tony Abbott and the liberal voters of Australia got publicly laughed at by the toffs themselves and told very publicly that this state of WA floats the nation so why don't you eat that one in question time until the election  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy




And so what is UWA's 'global reputation'?? A hot bed of deluded AGW alarmists?..If so 'selling out' their rep could only be a GOOD thing (it might introduce some balance to the debate on Global Warming/Climate Change/whatever the hell it's called this week).

And the actual 'effective' difference between 2 degrees C and 3 degrees C would be basically ZERO, for humans, and every other type of life on Earth.


Lomborg is probably much closer to accurate than the IPCC, Flannery, Gore, Mann and the rest of the catastrophic climate change believers will EVER be.


bro, light up the crack pipe again and get really bored why don't ya  Smiley


I'll leave that to you...an 'increase' of 6 degrees C..'MIGHT' be harmful to humans (and other life on Earth) but that's way more than even the real worst case scenarios.  2 degrees or even 3 degrees would only take the planet back to close to the temperatures that humans evolved in. Which is also what modern plants and animals also developed in.


an 'increase' of 6 degrees C..'MIGHT' be harmful to humans .

2 or 3 Deg is what they are saying we have already locked in. This type of increase is expected in the next 50 years or so. This isn't where it stops, its just the beginning. we keep increasing the CO2 output and that number will keep going up.


And so what??? Do you really think that humans, as a species, will 'magically' cease to exist when the temperatures rise a bit?? And that's without even mentioning the various 'non-believer' science that says it may not even get close to 2 degrees?

Given our current level of technological skill, even 6 degrees possibly  wouldn't be very difficult for humans to survive. Sure we might have to eat tofu and yeast type foods, but we'd still survive until the pendulum swung back.

lol,... then check out how he rounds out his argument  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

all those loose ends sewed up ay giz: pack that friggin glass pipe and start getting  really bored mate cos you have a few corrections to make over the next lifetime after a statement like that  Cheesy Cheesy

(like seriously  Roll Eyes)
Back to top
 
*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #335 - May 25th, 2015 at 4:20pm  
lee wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:15pm:
Isn't that 2-3 deg per doubling? 278ppm in 1700, 576ppm for a doubling. Or Bill Mckibben's 350ppm doubles to 700ppm.

Although their now appears to be some doubt on that.

An increase on historical levels of 120.6, and since the end of 1996, an increase of 36.16. An increase of approximately 30%, but temperatures are running flat, according to the satellite data.

hey look over there  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #336 - May 25th, 2015 at 4:20pm  
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:18pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:06pm:
Dnarever wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 3:52pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 3:19pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 2:54pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 2:32pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 11:59am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 24th, 2015 at 10:56pm:
So: you have NO idea then Grin Grin Grin Grin


i know Tony Abbott and the fascist liberal voters got caught trying to sell out the University of Western Australias global reputation to a (!global) political activist who wants to argue that fossil fuels should be allowed to warm our kids earth by 3 degrees instead of 2 and you can't pretend he didn't!

That's what I know buddy so bring it on fellla  Wink Wink

Tony Abbott and the liberal voters of Australia got publicly laughed at by the toffs themselves and told very publicly that this state of WA floats the nation so why don't you eat that one in question time until the election  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy




And so what is UWA's 'global reputation'?? A hot bed of deluded AGW alarmists?..If so 'selling out' their rep could only be a GOOD thing (it might introduce some balance to the debate on Global Warming/Climate Change/whatever the hell it's called this week).

And the actual 'effective' difference between 2 degrees C and 3 degrees C would be basically ZERO, for humans, and every other type of life on Earth.


Lomborg is probably much closer to accurate than the IPCC, Flannery, Gore, Mann and the rest of the catastrophic climate change believers will EVER be.


bro, light up the crack pipe again and get really bored why don't ya  Smiley


I'll leave that to you...an 'increase' of 6 degrees C..'MIGHT' be harmful to humans (and other life on Earth) but that's way more than even the real worst case scenarios.  2 degrees or even 3 degrees would only take the planet back to close to the temperatures that humans evolved in. Which is also what modern plants and animals also developed in.


an 'increase' of 6 degrees C..'MIGHT' be harmful to humans .

2 or 3 Deg is what they are saying we have already locked in. This type of increase is expected in the next 50 years or so. This isn't where it stops, its just the beginning. we keep increasing the CO2 output and that number will keep going up.


And so what??? Do you really think that humans, as a species, will 'magically' cease to exist when the temperatures rise a bit?? And that's without even mentioning the various 'non-believer' science that says it may not even get close to 2 degrees?

Given our current level of technological skill, even 6 degrees possibly  wouldn't be very difficult for humans to survive. Sure we might have to eat tofu and yeast type foods, but we'd still survive until the pendulum swung back.

lol,... then check out how he rounds out his argument  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

all those loose ends sewed up ay giz: pack that friggin glass pipe and start getting  really bored mate cos you have a few corrections to make over the next lifetime after a statement like that  Cheesy Cheesy

(like seriously  Roll Eyes)


Seriously, you have always been a smacking idiot. Leave the arguments to the adults.
Back to top
 
In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #337 - May 25th, 2015 at 4:24pm  
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:20pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:18pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:06pm:
Dnarever wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 3:52pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 3:19pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 2:54pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 2:32pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 11:59am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 24th, 2015 at 10:56pm:
So: you have NO idea then Grin Grin Grin Grin


i know Tony Abbott and the fascist liberal voters got caught trying to sell out the University of Western Australias global reputation to a (!global) political activist who wants to argue that fossil fuels should be allowed to warm our kids earth by 3 degrees instead of 2 and you can't pretend he didn't!

That's what I know buddy so bring it on fellla  Wink Wink

Tony Abbott and the liberal voters of Australia got publicly laughed at by the toffs themselves and told very publicly that this state of WA floats the nation so why don't you eat that one in question time until the election  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy




And so what is UWA's 'global reputation'?? A hot bed of deluded AGW alarmists?..If so 'selling out' their rep could only be a GOOD thing (it might introduce some balance to the debate on Global Warming/Climate Change/whatever the hell it's called this week).

And the actual 'effective' difference between 2 degrees C and 3 degrees C would be basically ZERO, for humans, and every other type of life on Earth.


Lomborg is probably much closer to accurate than the IPCC, Flannery, Gore, Mann and the rest of the catastrophic climate change believers will EVER be.


bro, light up the crack pipe again and get really bored why don't ya  Smiley


I'll leave that to you...an 'increase' of 6 degrees C..'MIGHT' be harmful to humans (and other life on Earth) but that's way more than even the real worst case scenarios.  2 degrees or even 3 degrees would only take the planet back to close to the temperatures that humans evolved in. Which is also what modern plants and animals also developed in.


an 'increase' of 6 degrees C..'MIGHT' be harmful to humans .

2 or 3 Deg is what they are saying we have already locked in. This type of increase is expected in the next 50 years or so. This isn't where it stops, its just the beginning. we keep increasing the CO2 output and that number will keep going up.


And so what??? Do you really think that humans, as a species, will 'magically' cease to exist when the temperatures rise a bit?? And that's without even mentioning the various 'non-believer' science that says it may not even get close to 2 degrees?

Given our current level of technological skill, even 6 degrees possibly  wouldn't be very difficult for humans to survive. Sure we might have to eat tofu and yeast type foods, but we'd still survive until the pendulum swung back.

lol,... then check out how he rounds out his argument  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

all those loose ends sewed up ay giz: pack that friggin glass pipe and start getting  really bored mate cos you have a few corrections to make over the next lifetime after a statement like that  Cheesy Cheesy

(like seriously  Roll Eyes)


Seriously, you have always been a smacking idiot. Leave the arguments to the adults.

make me  Wink
Back to top
 
*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #338 - May 25th, 2015 at 4:39pm  
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:20pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:18pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:06pm:
Dnarever wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 3:52pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 3:19pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 2:54pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 2:32pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 11:59am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 24th, 2015 at 10:56pm:
So: you have NO idea then Grin Grin Grin Grin


i know Tony Abbott and the fascist liberal voters got caught trying to sell out the University of Western Australias global reputation to a (!global) political activist who wants to argue that fossil fuels should be allowed to warm our kids earth by 3 degrees instead of 2 and you can't pretend he didn't!

That's what I know buddy so bring it on fellla  Wink Wink

Tony Abbott and the liberal voters of Australia got publicly laughed at by the toffs themselves and told very publicly that this state of WA floats the nation so why don't you eat that one in question time until the election  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy




And so what is UWA's 'global reputation'?? A hot bed of deluded AGW alarmists?..If so 'selling out' their rep could only be a GOOD thing (it might introduce some balance to the debate on Global Warming/Climate Change/whatever the hell it's called this week).

And the actual 'effective' difference between 2 degrees C and 3 degrees C would be basically ZERO, for humans, and every other type of life on Earth.


Lomborg is probably much closer to accurate than the IPCC, Flannery, Gore, Mann and the rest of the catastrophic climate change believers will EVER be.


bro, light up the crack pipe again and get really bored why don't ya  Smiley


I'll leave that to you...an 'increase' of 6 degrees C..'MIGHT' be harmful to humans (and other life on Earth) but that's way more than even the real worst case scenarios.  2 degrees or even 3 degrees would only take the planet back to close to the temperatures that humans evolved in. Which is also what modern plants and animals also developed in.


an 'increase' of 6 degrees C..'MIGHT' be harmful to humans .

2 or 3 Deg is what they are saying we have already locked in. This type of increase is expected in the next 50 years or so. This isn't where it stops, its just the beginning. we keep increasing the CO2 output and that number will keep going up.


And so what??? Do you really think that humans, as a species, will 'magically' cease to exist when the temperatures rise a bit?? And that's without even mentioning the various 'non-believer' science that says it may not even get close to 2 degrees?

Given our current level of technological skill, even 6 degrees possibly  wouldn't be very difficult for humans to survive. Sure we might have to eat tofu and yeast type foods, but we'd still survive until the pendulum swung back.

lol,... then check out how he rounds out his argument  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

all those loose ends sewed up ay giz: pack that friggin glass pipe and start getting  really bored mate cos you have a few corrections to make over the next lifetime after a statement like that  Cheesy Cheesy

(like seriously  Roll Eyes)


Seriously, you have always been a smacking idiot. Leave the arguments to the adults.


Going by his/her posts...YES always a smacking idiot.
Back to top
 
"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #339 - May 25th, 2015 at 4:45pm  
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:39pm:
Going by his/her posts...YES always a smacking idiot.

Says gizmo who admits to guessing a 3 degree temperature rise should be fine 
Wink Wink
Back to top
 
*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 62097
Here
Gender: male
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #340 - May 25th, 2015 at 5:00pm  
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:06pm:
And so what??? Do you really think that humans, as a species, will 'magically' cease to exist when the temperatures rise a bit?? And that's without even mentioning the various 'non-believer' science that says it may not even get close to 2 degrees?

Given our current level of technological skill, even 6 degrees possibly  wouldn't be very difficult for humans to survive. Sure we might have to eat tofu and yeast type foods, but we'd still survive until the pendulum swung back.


The expectation of substantial temperature increase is that vastly less viable farming land would be available.

We would be able to produce enough food to feed a few billion less people. I would hope that there is a record of all the people who have obstructed action and their descendants are on the list to not be getting fed.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #341 - May 25th, 2015 at 5:02pm  
Dnarever wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 5:00pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:06pm:
And so what??? Do you really think that humans, as a species, will 'magically' cease to exist when the temperatures rise a bit?? And that's without even mentioning the various 'non-believer' science that says it may not even get close to 2 degrees?

Given our current level of technological skill, even 6 degrees possibly  wouldn't be very difficult for humans to survive. Sure we might have to eat tofu and yeast type foods, but we'd still survive until the pendulum swung back.


The expectation of substantial temperature increase is that vastly less viable farming land would be available.

We would be able to produce enough food to feed a few billion less people. I would hope that there is a record of all the people who have obstructed action and their descendants are on the list to not be getting fed.


Really, so all those cool/cold climate lands would not be usable if the temperatures warmed???

The bigger risk of starvation is from cooler temperatures, not from warmer ones.
Back to top
 
"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #342 - May 25th, 2015 at 5:03pm  
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:45pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:39pm:
Going by his/her posts...YES always a smacking idiot.

Says gizmo who admits to guessing a 3 degree temperature rise should be fine 
Wink Wink


Yes, which is still true..you ARE a smacking idiot...deal with it. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 
"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #343 - May 25th, 2015 at 5:12pm  
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 5:02pm:
Dnarever wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 5:00pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:06pm:
And so what??? Do you really think that humans, as a species, will 'magically' cease to exist when the temperatures rise a bit?? And that's without even mentioning the various 'non-believer' science that says it may not even get close to 2 degrees?

Given our current level of technological skill, even 6 degrees possibly  wouldn't be very difficult for humans to survive. Sure we might have to eat tofu and yeast type foods, but we'd still survive until the pendulum swung back.


The expectation of substantial temperature increase is that vastly less viable farming land would be available.

We would be able to produce enough food to feed a few billion less people. I would hope that there is a record of all the people who have obstructed action and their descendants are on the list to not be getting fed.


Really, so all those cool/cold climate lands would not be usable if the temperatures warmed???

The bigger risk of starvation is from cooler temperatures, not from warmer ones.

...again the con man called gizmo insists on reducing a complex system to a simple one!

Where is all the science to support your crack smoke induced ramblings buddy?

Thanx for playing  Cheesy
Back to top
 
*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Abbott and Liberal Party were correct. AGW BS
Reply #344 - May 25th, 2015 at 5:15pm  
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 5:03pm:
BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:45pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on May 25th, 2015 at 4:39pm:
Going by his/her posts...YES always a smacking idiot.

Says gizmo who admits to guessing a 3 degree temperature rise should be fine 
Wink Wink


Yes, which is still true..you ARE a smacking idiot...deal with it. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


Hey, how about that lomborg bloke getting told to get the funk out of Western Australias proud University systems for fear of poisoning their reputation  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

...I bet all the lib voters love talking about that one instead of trying to hide it under the carpet like a bunch of intergenerational thieves  Huh Huh Huh Huh Huh Huh Huh Huh Huh  Smiley Smiley
Back to top
 
*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 25 ... 33
Send Topic Print
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
 
 

  « Forum ‹ Board Top of this page

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge