Reading the comments on this thread it seems that the opposing party has difficulty understanding the terms of the bet I offered(and still do).
Obviously their is more chance that a murderer in Australia will be non-Moslem than Moslem. As stated 23000000 to 400000 population.
In light of this the terms of the bet are as follows.
Australia, total population 23,000,000 (400000 Moslem)
-vs-
the "west", total population 1.73 billion (47,000,000 Moslems)
I am stating that it is more probable that Australia will experience a homocide perpetrated by a non-Muslim than the west will experience and Homocide motovated by extreme Islam.
Their are twice as many Moslems in this sample as the total population of Australia.
To all the Islamaphobes this is what is known as a free swing!
Unless the whole rational for your opinions is flawed.
I state this because it is shown statistically, in easily available records.
If you are not prepared to take the bet it must be because you know how small the probability of a violent Islamic attack is.
Either that or you just couldn't live without my friendly banter !
fruit up or shut up
your comparison is illogical.
Might as well say 'A child fell off their bike today but no snake killed anyone. Therefore bikes are worse than snakes.'