Moslem MP, in the English parliament,
argues for marriage to 1st cousins to be made lawful in England.
........because it is what his community wants !
PLEASE WATCH THE 10 min YOUTUBE......The creator of this YT,
poses some interesting questions......
......relating to the likely imposition of laws which specifically serve and favour,
primarily 'migrant' communities.
Watch the YT, and also read the spiel presented below [by the creator of this YT]......
MINE......Much of early Australian law has its basis in British Law.
QDoes Australian constitutional law share the same
"Act of Settlement [Law]",
which was established in British Law ?
-------- >
-------- >
-------- >
Quote:
"The Act of Settlement 1701.
A law originally designed
to protect the state from undue foreign influence in governance.........."
- Andy The Gabby Cabby
.
In the YT below, a moslem MP in the British parliament...argues for marriage to 1st cousins,
be made lawful, in Britain.....
.....BECAUSE IT IS WHAT HIS COMMUNITY WANTS.
------ >
------ >
------ >
Muslim MP BREAKS DOWN in Parliament
Defending the UNTHINKABLE!!!
Feb 24, 2026https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYhRkCsOe4Y
AND IN THE YT.....Did you catch the Scottish Labor racist,
@ 07.30 ???
n.b.This Scottish Labor racist, does NOT express, any interested in
the competence of people [holding public positions],
.......
but.....only with the colour of their skin. !!!
This diatribe would be called RACISM......if >> he << was a 'White' man, with a different argument.
.
EXAMINE THESE 'POINTS OF ORDER'
WHICH THE YT AUTHOR PRESENTS TO US......
Quote:
Has Britain drifted away from its constitutional foundations?
In this video, I start with something most politicians never mention:
The Act of Settlement 1701.
A law originally designed to protect the state from undue foreign influence in governance.
So what changed?
Over the centuries we’ve seen the introduction of later statutes — including the British Nationality Act 1948 and the British Nationality Act 1981 — alongside reforms to representation and citizenship.
The question is:
Have these changes strengthened the country — or diluted its constitutional intent?
We examine:
The debate in Parliament around cousin marriage and cultural norms
Whether cultural accommodation has limits
Integration vs parallel practice
The principle that laws should apply equally to everyone
The tension between modern diversity policy and historic constitutional identity
We also look at controversial comments in Scotland regarding representation in public institutions, and ask a difficult question:
Should public appointments be about competence alone?
Or about demographic balancing?
This video isn’t about hostility.
It’s about:
? Law
? Culture
? Sovereignty
? Integration
? Constitutional continuity
And ultimately:
Who decides what this country stands for?
Q.Should the laws and cultural customs of a large 'migrant' community [e.g. which is resident within the UK],
be allowed to be imposed into 'amended' British law, once a large enough 'migrant' community has the demographic 'ability' to do so ?
Even when to do so, could very well be against the historic cultural interest [and other interests] of the native people of that 'host' nation ?
e.g.Allow a large 'migrant' community, to, for example, impose large swathes of [their own] Sharia law, so as to have effect within a nation like Britain......once a large voting 'migrant' community [within Britain] is able to 'muster' a governing authority, to impose such 'cultural' and legislative changes ?
This is what it is coming to....people !!
Forum
Pages: 1
UK - moslem MP argues for marriage to 1st cousins (Read 254 times)
