Gandalf wrote:
Quote:Actually, my personal view is that militants killing and beheading soldiers of an authoritarian regime who are widely perceived as responsible for atrocities against civilians - would sit at the very mild end of the 'degeneracy' spectrum. What do you think moses - was that really the best example to use do you think?
So two points about this particular example that remain relevant:
1. morally - I actually don't think it is "worse" than a man beating his wife to death
2. in terms of the threat posed by muslims in the west - you really couldn't have picked a worse example - these beheaders are leaving the west to hunt down and kill other non-westerners. How can you possibly say these people pose more of a threat to wife killers or other murderers in Australia?
What don't you understand about my statement:
Quote:The courts and our legal system recognize different degrees of homicide, most people agree with this. There can be premeditated homicide, accidental homicide, etc.etc.
Differing sentences are handed out based on this system.
Therefore some are legally considered worse than others.
If you don't like it, take it up with our state and federal governments and courts.
I also stated
Quote:For my mind muslims who murder people as a religious requirement, are as revoltingly evil, as the worst of the worst murderers in our society.
I stand by this absolutely, muslims torturing and murdering innocent men, women and children because their cult, satanic deity, depraved prophet and handbook of perversion and atrocities (qur'an) tell them to do it, these muslims are among the most evil revolting people on this earth.
All you're desperately trying to do is squirm away from what I first wrote:
Quote:So once again the apologists and the muslims are disingenuously trying to stifle debate about the dangers of muslims.
There has been one Australian muslim man take his primary school aged kid overseas to participate in islamic beheading, he then posted the pictures on the internet to show his obedience to islam.
If the muslims and the apologists can show me 58 non muslims who have carried out the same degenerate actions as this muslim I will recant every single anti islam post I've ever made.
If the muslims and the apologists can't show me 58 non muslims who have committed the same kind of atrocities, do they have the balls to withdraw every single excuse and apology they have made?
There has been at least two muslim women who have gone overseas to participate in islamic atrocities.
Same deal show me 116 non muslim women who have committed the same kind of atrocity I'll withdraw and relinquish all my anti islamic views.
Does any muslim or apologist have the guts to accept the challenge, if you can't provide proof of 116 non muslim women committing the same kind of depravity, will they stop making excuses and apologies for islam?
There has been one muslim hold hostages at the lindt cafe while proclaiming the shahada.
Again I offer the same deal can the muslims and their apologists show me 58 non muslims committing the same kind of depravity?
I'll even double your chances of winning and double my chances of losing, don't find 58 half will do, find 29 non muslims per muslim in each case, who have performed such depraved acts as the muslims.
The challenge still stands Gandalf find me 58 other Australian non muslims (per each muslim perpetrator) who have committed the same depravities as the above muslims.
Or like I also said half will do, find 29 non muslim Australians(per each muslim perpetrator) who have committed the same type of depravities.