Pho Huc wrote on Jul 20
th, 2015 at 12:54pm:
Big Donger wrote on Jul 20
th, 2015 at 12:14am:
Sprintcyclist wrote on Jul 19
th, 2015 at 11:19pm:
14 pages of mass murders and apologetics and diverters are still lying.
What is the bet an Islamic mass murder happens within a month ?
As strange as it may seem, Sprint, what this country needs is a successful attack on Australian soil to shut the idiots up and let decent white people take control of our Freeeedom.
You would honestly be happier with people being killed if it helped support an argument you are making in a online forum.
and you say that Moslems are the people I should be scared off????
You've got it, Pho. Sprint honestly would be happier with people being killed in the name of terrorism. Many posters here would.
Remember, in the late 1990s, Putin made the invasion of Chechnya possible by having the Russian secret police detonate bombs in Moscow apartment blocks. Hundreds of Russians were killed in what was the prelude to the War On Terror.
I've never agreed that Sept 11 was an inside job, but the case of Putin shows how far the knuckleheads will go to prove a point. In Putin's case, he was happy to bomb his own civilians.
I doubt Sprint would go as far as placing the bomb himself, but his desire for this to happen echoes a number of posters here. Longy also calls for terrorist attacks, in his words, "to shut the idiots up". The chorus has been getting louder of late, backing the government's security agenda. People
want the terror threat raised. Whenever it gets classified as high, they love it. Terrorism has become the new Circus Maximus. If there ever is a terrorist attack, they'll be cheering.
The only successful terrorist bombing in Australia, the Sydney Hilton Bombing, was implemented by the Special Branch of the NSW police. Unlike Putin's bombings, the Hilton bomb was not meant to go off, but be "discovered" by police at the scene. The police didn't plan for a garbage run that night, so the bomb killed a garbage collector and seriously injured a cop. The motive for the Hilton Bombing is still unclear, but the Special Branch had a track record of wanting to "shut the idiots up".
In the end, the Hilton Bombing backfired. The Special Branch was disbanded after a parliamentary investigation.
In Putin's case, it won him his presidency. The Moscow bombings, however, never went away. The role of the secret police was uncovered on Moscow TV. As the ex-director of the secret police, Putin has always been implicated. His attempts at a cover-up are on the record.
Could it happen here? I doubt it. But if it does, I'd be looking closely at those with the most to gain.
If i was a political leader(particularly a unpopular leader) I wouldn't be unhappy if a terrorist incident occurred in my country.
It gives you a great opportunity to demonstrate how tough you are on national security.
It also allows you to accuse any who oppose you of supporting the terrorists.
I don't think T Abbott would orchestrate such an action, but the political climate that has existed post 9/11 has given a tremendous advantage to those who are prepared to use such tools as a means of leveraging their own personal political ambitions.
Scared people don't ask intelligent questions.
p.s The parliamentary investigation concluded that while they did plan the attack, procure the device and place it in the bin they were not responsible for the attack.
Responsibility for the attack was allocated to a copy of the Quran, which was located only 35km away from the office where the attack was planned.
It was felt the without the nefarious influence of the Quran they bombing would never have happened, only a garden tea party as originally intended by the perpetrators.