Australian Politics Forum - * woeful journalism on anything and everything

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	* woeful journalism on anything and everything Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 3:19am For example: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/27/the-big-melt-antarctica_n_6766290.html ..in then end, nothing!
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

innocentbystander. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4723 Gender:	*Re: woeful journalism on anything and everything Reply #1 -** Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 12:14pm More hysterical alarmist nonsense, global warming kooks like that should be beamed back to 15th century Peru so they can sacrifice a virgin or two to the Sun God.
Back to top	IP Logged

gizmo_2655 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 16010 South West NSW Gender:	*Re: woeful journalism on anything and everything Reply #2 -** Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 4:01pm innocentbystander. wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 12:14pm: More hysterical alarmist nonsense, global warming kooks like that should be beamed back to 15th century Peru so they can sacrifice a virgin or two to the Sun God. SHH don't give them ideas
Back to top	"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition. It's similar to a strawman fallacy" Bobbythebat IP Logged

Dnarever Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 62334 Here Gender:	*Re: woeful journalism on anything and everything Reply #3 - Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 4:02pm Quote:** woeful journalism on anything and everything At least they excel at something.
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	*Re: woeful journalism on anything and everything Reply #4 -** Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 4:41pm innocentbystander. wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 12:14pm: More hysterical alarmist nonsense, global warming kooks like that should be beamed back to 15th century Peru so they can sacrifice a virgin or two to the Sun God. Funny you should mention Peru
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

Wolseley Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1453 Sydney Gender:	*Re: woeful journalism on anything and everything Reply #5 -** Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 4:43pm When I saw the title, I thought this was going to be a thread about the Daily Telegraph.
Back to top	IP Logged

Chimp_Logic

Gold Member

Offline

πολιτικός

Posts: 4826
Mawson Base
Gender: male

Re: * woeful journalism on anything and everything
Reply #6 - Mar 7^th, 2015 at 9:47pm

innocentbystander. wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2015 at 12:14pm:

More hysterical alarmist nonsense, global warming kooks like that should be beamed back to 15th century Peru so they can sacrifice a virgin or two to the Sun God. Grin

So you cannot understand a basic scientific fact like Anthropogenic Global warming. Its barely high school level science....

The science that underpins AGW was settled in the late 1980s and first proposed in the 1850s and theoretically described by Arrhenius as early as in the mid 1890s.

In these times, it takes great ignorant political discipline to think otherwise...

But then again there are medical doctors today that dispute the link between smoking tobacco products and cancer.

There are also geologists who believe in a biblically young earth (ie around 6000 years)

So you're not alone

Back to top

Mini Ice Age (2014-2029)
Dr Sircus cures cancer with Baking Soda and Magnesium - Jethro the MENTAL GIANT & his flute madness

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21622
Gender: male

Re: * woeful journalism on anything and everything
Reply #7 - Mar 8^th, 2015 at 1:03pm

'The GHG Theory proposed years ago by Arrhenius has been debunked.
He [Arrhenius] believed that space was aether.
He based his GHG Theory on this belief.
He claimed that the aether simulated the glass in a greenhouse and "trapped" heat.
BUT.. the aether belief was debunked by Michelson-Morley, hence the GHG theory is invalid.'

Comment at : http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/climate-science-is-not-yet-settled-on-warming.html

But the earth is not a greenhouse. Water vapour is the most common GHG.

'I’m a professional infrared astronomer who spent his life trying to observe space through the atmosphere’s back-radiation that the environmental activists claim is caused by CO2 and guess what? In all the bands that are responsible for back radiation in the brightness temperatures (color temperatures) related to earth’s surface temperature (between 9 microns and 13 microns for temps of 220K to 320 K) there is no absorption of radiation by CO2 at all. In all the bands between 9 and 9.5 there is mild absorption by H2O, from 9.5 to 10 microns (300 K) the atmosphere is perfectly clear except around 9.6 is a big ozone band that the warmists never mention for some reason. From 10 to 13 microns there is more absorption by H2O. Starting at 13 we get CO2 absorption but that wavelength corresponds to temperatures below even that of the south pole. Nowhere from 9 to 13 microns do we see appreciable absorption bands of CO2. This means the greenhouse effect is way over 95% caused by water vapor and probably less than 3% from CO2.'

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/01/25/ir-expert-speaks-out-after-40-yea
rs-of-silence-its-the-water-vapor-stupid-and-not-the-co2/

Back to top

IP Logged

progressiveslol

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17029

Re: * woeful journalism on anything and everything
Reply #8 - Mar 8^th, 2015 at 4:03pm

lee wrote on Mar 8^th, 2015 at 1:03pm:

'The GHG Theory proposed years ago by Arrhenius has been debunked.
He [Arrhenius] believed that space was aether.
He based his GHG Theory on this belief.
He claimed that the aether simulated the glass in a greenhouse and "trapped" heat.
BUT.. the aether belief was debunked by Michelson-Morley, hence the GHG theory is invalid.'

Comment at : http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/climate-science-is-not-yet-settled-on-warming.html

But the earth is not a greenhouse. Water vapour is the most common GHG.

'I’m a professional infrared astronomer who spent his life trying to observe space through the atmosphere’s back-radiation that the environmental activists claim is caused by CO2 and guess what? In all the bands that are responsible for back radiation in the brightness temperatures (color temperatures) related to earth’s surface temperature (between 9 microns and 13 microns for temps of 220K to 320 K) there is no absorption of radiation by CO2 at all. In all the bands between 9 and 9.5 there is mild absorption by H2O, from 9.5 to 10 microns (300 K) the atmosphere is perfectly clear except around 9.6 is a big ozone band that the warmists never mention for some reason. From 10 to 13 microns there is more absorption by H2O. Starting at 13 we get CO2 absorption but that wavelength corresponds to temperatures below even that of the south pole. Nowhere from 9 to 13 microns do we see appreciable absorption bands of CO2. This means the greenhouse effect is way over 95% caused by water vapor and probably less than 3% from CO2.'

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/01/25/ir-expert-speaks-out-after-40-yea
rs-of-silence-its-the-water-vapor-stupid-and-not-the-co2/

Nice find Lee. Make you wonder what the pseudo scientist of AGW smoke to give off the fumes to their followers.

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * woeful journalism on anything and everything
Reply #9 - Mar 9^th, 2015 at 9:20pm

lee wrote on Mar 8^th, 2015 at 1:03pm:

'The GHG Theory proposed years ago by Arrhenius has been debunked.
He [Arrhenius] believed that space was aether.
He based his GHG Theory on this belief.
He claimed that the aether simulated the glass in a greenhouse and "trapped" heat.
BUT.. the aether belief was debunked by Michelson-Morley, hence the GHG theory is invalid.'

Comment at : http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/climate-science-is-not-yet-settled-on-warming.html

But the earth is not a greenhouse. Water vapour is the most common GHG.

'I’m a professional infrared astronomer who spent his life trying to observe space through the atmosphere’s back-radiation that the environmental activists claim is caused by CO2 and guess what? In all the bands that are responsible for back radiation in the brightness temperatures (color temperatures) related to earth’s surface temperature (between 9 microns and 13 microns for temps of 220K to 320 K) there is no absorption of radiation by CO2 at all. In all the bands between 9 and 9.5 there is mild absorption by H2O, from 9.5 to 10 microns (300 K) the atmosphere is perfectly clear except around 9.6 is a big ozone band that the warmists never mention for some reason. From 10 to 13 microns there is more absorption by H2O. Starting at 13 we get CO2 absorption but that wavelength corresponds to temperatures below even that of the south pole. Nowhere from 9 to 13 microns do we see appreciable absorption bands of CO2. This means the greenhouse effect is way over 95% caused by water vapor and probably less than 3% from CO2.'

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/01/25/ir-expert-speaks-out-after-40-yea
rs-of-silence-its-the-water-vapor-stupid-and-not-the-co2/

Water vapour is in a cycle: maybe you've heard of it?

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * woeful journalism on anything and everything
Reply #10 - Mar 9^th, 2015 at 9:25pm

progressiveslol wrote on Mar 8^th, 2015 at 4:03pm:

lee wrote on Mar 8^th, 2015 at 1:03pm:

'The GHG Theory proposed years ago by Arrhenius has been debunked.
He [Arrhenius] believed that space was aether.
He based his GHG Theory on this belief.
He claimed that the aether simulated the glass in a greenhouse and "trapped" heat.
BUT.. the aether belief was debunked by Michelson-Morley, hence the GHG theory is invalid.'

Comment at : http://www.climatechangedispatch.com/climate-science-is-not-yet-settled-on-warming.html

But the earth is not a greenhouse. Water vapour is the most common GHG.

'I’m a professional infrared astronomer who spent his life trying to observe space through the atmosphere’s back-radiation that the environmental activists claim is caused by CO2 and guess what? In all the bands that are responsible for back radiation in the brightness temperatures (color temperatures) related to earth’s surface temperature (between 9 microns and 13 microns for temps of 220K to 320 K) there is no absorption of radiation by CO2 at all. In all the bands between 9 and 9.5 there is mild absorption by H2O, from 9.5 to 10 microns (300 K) the atmosphere is perfectly clear except around 9.6 is a big ozone band that the warmists never mention for some reason. From 10 to 13 microns there is more absorption by H2O. Starting at 13 we get CO2 absorption but that wavelength corresponds to temperatures below even that of the south pole. Nowhere from 9 to 13 microns do we see appreciable absorption bands of CO2. This means the greenhouse effect is way over 95% caused by water vapor and probably less than 3% from CO2.'

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/01/25/ir-expert-speaks-out-after-40-yea
rs-of-silence-its-the-water-vapor-stupid-and-not-the-co2/

Nice find Lee. Make you wonder what the pseudo scientist of AGW smoke to give off the fumes to their followers.

Water vapour is in a cycle: perhaps you have heard of it or do you really hate my kids that much??

I KNOW YOU DO Shocked

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21622 Gender:	*Re: woeful journalism on anything and everything Reply #11 -** Mar 10^th, 2015 at 5:25pm Seeing as Co2 has been both higher and lower in the past it could be argued that Co2 is in a cycle.
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	*Re: woeful journalism on anything and everything Reply #12 -** Mar 11^th, 2015 at 10:18am lee wrote on Mar 10^th, 2015 at 5:25pm: Seeing as Co2 has been both higher and lower in the past it could be argued that Co2 is in a cycle. LOL, let's forget about the industrial age shall we
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21622 Gender:	*Re: woeful journalism on anything and everything Reply #13 -** Mar 11^th, 2015 at 12:01pm So what caused the CO2 spike pre-industrial era?
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	*Re: woeful journalism on anything and everything Reply #14 -** Mar 11^th, 2015 at 12:26pm lee wrote on Mar 11^th, 2015 at 12:01pm: So what caused the CO2 spike pre-industrial era? Does it matter?
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged