Australian Politics Forum - * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	* The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change * Jan 29^th, 2015 at 5:55pm What is the use of having developed a science well enough to make predictions if, in the end, all we’re willing to do is stand around and wait for them to come true? source: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/planet-oz/2015/jan/28/queensland-election...
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21603
Gender: male

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #1 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 12:07pm

Of course first we have to have "developed a science well enough to make predictions".

'Tropical cyclones, coral predation by crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS), and coral bleaching accounted for 48%, 42%, and 10% of the respective estimated losses, amounting to 3.38% y−1 mortality rate. Importantly, the relatively pristine northern region showed no overall decline. '

http://www.pnas.org/content/109/44/17995.full

HMM, no overall decline in the northern region. 10% due to coral bleaching, no increase in tropical cyclones.

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #2 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 12:49pm

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 12:07pm:

Of course first we have to have "developed a science well enough to make predictions".

'Tropical cyclones, coral predation by crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS), and coral bleaching accounted for 48%, 42%, and 10% of the respective estimated losses, amounting to 3.38% y−1 mortality rate. Importantly, the relatively pristine northern region showed no overall decline. '

http://www.pnas.org/content/109/44/17995.full

HMM, no overall decline in the northern region. 10% due to coral bleaching, no increase in tropical cyclones.

Cyclone intensities are increasing with warming ocean temperatures, although projected increases are greater for the Northern Hemisphere than for the Southern Hemisphere (6). The recent frequency and intensity of mass coral bleaching are of major concern, and are directly attributable to rising atmospheric greenhouse gases (3). To date, the GBR has lost fewer corals to bleaching and diseases than many other regions in the world (13, 24), but bleaching mortality will almost certainly increase in the GBR, given the upward trend in temperatures (25).

..same reference source Shocked

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #3 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 1:05pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 29^th, 2015 at 5:55pm:

What is the use of having developed a science well enough to make predictions if, in the end, all we’re willing to do is stand around and wait for them to come true?

source: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/planet-oz/2015/jan/28/queensland-election...

Perhaps if the 'predictions' were accurate, or even based on science, rather than ideology people MIGHT be willing to listen, or use the 'science' in politics.. Grin

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21603 Gender:	Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change * Reply #4 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 1:14pm BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 12:49pm: are greater for the Northern Hemisphere than for the Southern Hemisphere ( Just as well we live in the Southern Hemisphere then. Source BOM
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #5 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 1:25pm

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 1:14pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 12:49pm:

are greater for the Northern Hemisphere than for the Southern Hemisphere (

Just as well we live in the Southern Hemisphere then.

http://www.bom.gov.au/cyclone/images/tc-graph-1969-2012.png

Source BOM

The axes on your graph aren't very well labelled are they mate Wink

.. any reason for that??

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #6 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:35pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 1:25pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 1:14pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 12:49pm:

are greater for the Northern Hemisphere than for the Southern Hemisphere (

Just as well we live in the Southern Hemisphere then.

http://www.bom.gov.au/cyclone/images/tc-graph-1969-2012.png

Source BOM

The axes on your graph aren't very well labelled are they mate Wink

.. any reason for that??

Yes, they ARE 'well labelled'...the reason is that the alarmists don't like reality...

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #7 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:38pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:35pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 1:25pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 1:14pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 12:49pm:

are greater for the Northern Hemisphere than for the Southern Hemisphere (

Just as well we live in the Southern Hemisphere then.

http://www.bom.gov.au/cyclone/images/tc-graph-1969-2012.png

Source BOM

The axes on your graph aren't very well labelled are they mate Wink

.. any reason for that??

Yes, they ARE 'well labelled'...the reason is that the alarmists don't like reality...

Don't tell me what's what mate: you're a complete joke if you think that graph explains itself and every single person on this forum would agree... unless they are copper internet fans of course Embarrassed

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #8 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:46pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:38pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:35pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 1:25pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 1:14pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 12:49pm:

are greater for the Northern Hemisphere than for the Southern Hemisphere (

Just as well we live in the Southern Hemisphere then.

http://www.bom.gov.au/cyclone/images/tc-graph-1969-2012.png

Source BOM

The axes on your graph aren't very well labelled are they mate Wink

.. any reason for that??

Yes, they ARE 'well labelled'...the reason is that the alarmists don't like reality...

Don't tell me what's what mate: you're a complete joke if you think that graph explains itself and [highlight]every single person on this forum would agree...[/highlight] unless they are copper internet fans of course Embarrassed

Why not...you really seem to 'need' someone to actually TELL you 'what's what'

And way less than 50% of the people on this forum would 'agree' because most people can actually look and and understand the climate records...which means that do NOT agree with your idea of retard Global Warming...

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21603 Gender:	Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change * Reply #9 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them? As can be seen it's from here- http://www.bom.gov.au/cyclone/images/tc-graph-1969-2012.png And it shows the number of cyclones per year and their interpretation of severity.
Back to top	« Last Edit: Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:06pm by lee » IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change * Reply #10 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm: You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them? You posted it... man up buddy
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

gizmo_2655 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 16010 South West NSW Gender:	Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change * Reply #11 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm: lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm: You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them? You posted it... man up buddy So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???
Back to top	"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition. It's similar to a strawman fallacy" Bobbythebat IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21603 Gender:	Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change * Reply #12 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:08pm gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm: So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'??? When the story differs from reality; go with the story.
Back to top	IP Logged

gizmo_2655 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 16010 South West NSW Gender:	Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change * Reply #13 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:11pm lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:08pm: gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm: So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'??? When the story differs from reality; go with the story. :) Yep, that DOES seem to be the idea, mostly for those idiots climate change 'believers'
Back to top	"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition. It's similar to a strawman fallacy" Bobbythebat IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #14 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #15 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:11pm

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:08pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

When the story differs from reality; go with the story.

Lee thinks desertification is funny yet http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/29/shell-urges-shareholders-to-a...

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #16 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:17pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:11pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:08pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

When the story differs from reality; go with the story.

Lee thinks desertification is funny yet http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/29/shell-urges-shareholders-to-a...

NO, Lee might to think that 'desertification' is stupid...which is really what the rest of us humans think...as opposed to idiots like YOU

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #17 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:22pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:17pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:11pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:08pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

When the story differs from reality; go with the story.

Lee thinks desertification is funny yet http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/29/shell-urges-shareholders-to-a...

NO, Lee might to think that 'desertification' is stupid...which is really what the rest of us humans think...as opposed to idiots like YOU

Desertification is no laughing matter... Shocked

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21603
Gender: male

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #18 - Jan 30^th, 2015 at 5:17pm

Desertification?

'Deserts 'greening' from rising CO2'

http://www.csiro.au/Portals/Media/Deserts-greening-from-rising-CO2.aspx

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:22pm:

Lee thinks desertification is funny yet http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/29/shell-urges-shareholders-to-a...

That story doesn't even mention desert let alone desertification.

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #19 - Jan 31^st, 2015 at 6:31pm

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 5:17pm:

Desertification?

'Deserts 'greening' from rising CO2'

http://www.csiro.au/Portals/Media/Deserts-greening-from-rising-CO2.aspx

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:22pm:

Lee thinks desertification is funny yet http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/29/shell-urges-shareholders-to-a...

That story doesn't even mention desert let alone desertification

.

It doesn't have to as I am implying that desertification is the reason investors are now demanding action on climate change...

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #20 - Jan 31^st, 2015 at 6:33pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 31^st, 2015 at 6:31pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 5:17pm:

Desertification?

'Deserts 'greening' from rising CO2'

http://www.csiro.au/Portals/Media/Deserts-greening-from-rising-CO2.aspx

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:22pm:

Lee thinks desertification is funny yet http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/29/shell-urges-shareholders-to-a...

That story doesn't even mention desert let alone desertification.

It doesn't have to as I am implying that desertification is the reason investors are now demanding action on climate change...

..however there will be secondary effects that are likely to influence water availability, the carbon cycle, fire regimes and biodiversity, for example," Dr Donohue said.
"Ongoing research is required if we are to fully comprehend the potential extent and severity of such secondary effects."

..from lees very own source no less Roll Eyes

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #21 - Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #22 - Feb 1^st, 2015 at 10:22pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

and....

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #23 - Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:03am

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 10:22pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

and....

And any child who (successfully) passed 3rd class should have no trouble reading and understanding a simple bar graph Grin

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #24 - Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:41am

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:03am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 10:22pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

and....

And any child who (successfully) passed 3rd class should have no trouble reading and understanding a simple bar graph Grin

But if it wasn't labelled correctly they would be asking a lot of questions Cheesy

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #25 - Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 7:39am

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:41am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:03am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 10:22pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

and....

And any child who (successfully) passed 3rd class should have no trouble reading and understanding a simple bar graph Grin

But if it wasn't labelled correctly they would be asking a lot of questions Cheesy

However, since the graph lee posted WAS clearly and correctly labelled, that doesn't apply in this case.

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #26 - Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 2:23pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 7:39am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:41am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:03am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 10:22pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

and....

And any child who (successfully) passed 3rd class should have no trouble reading and understanding a simple bar graph Grin

But if it wasn't labelled correctly they would be asking a lot of questions Cheesy

However, since the graph lee posted WAS clearly and correctly labelled, that doesn't apply in this case.

Dr Gizmo is on the case: yes sir, hitler sir!

Cheesy

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #27 - Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 2:58pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 2:23pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 7:39am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:41am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:03am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 10:22pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

and....

And any child who (successfully) passed 3rd class should have no trouble reading and understanding a simple bar graph Grin

But if it wasn't labelled correctly they would be asking a lot of questions Cheesy

However, since the graph lee posted WAS clearly and correctly labelled, that doesn't apply in this case.

Dr Gizmo is on the case: yes sir, hitler sir!

Cheesy

Don't get all upset because you either (a can't understand a simple graph, or (b refuse to accept it (because it totally stuffs up your story about the increase in the number and severity of tropical storms...

Man up, and admit you drank the Gore-Coolaid and got conned.

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #28 - Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 3:04pm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 2:58pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 2:23pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 7:39am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:41am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:03am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 10:22pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

and....

And any child who (successfully) passed 3rd class should have no trouble reading and understanding a simple bar graph Grin

But if it wasn't labelled correctly they would be asking a lot of questions Cheesy

However, since the graph lee posted WAS clearly and correctly labelled, that doesn't apply in this case.

Dr Gizmo is on the case: yes sir, hitler sir!

Cheesy

Don't get all upset because you either (a can't understand a simple graph, or (b refuse to accept it (because it totally stuffs up your story about the increase in the number and severity of tropical storms...

Man up, and admit you drank the Gore-Coolaid and got conned.

i'M NOT A PSEPHOLOGIST

"bYE bYE TONY ABBOTT...!"

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #29 - Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 9:18pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 3:04pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 2:58pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 2:23pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 7:39am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:41am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:03am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 10:22pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

and....

And any child who (successfully) passed 3rd class should have no trouble reading and understanding a simple bar graph Grin

But if it wasn't labelled correctly they would be asking a lot of questions Cheesy

However, since the graph lee posted WAS clearly and correctly labelled, that doesn't apply in this case.

Dr Gizmo is on the case: yes sir, hitler sir!

Cheesy

Don't get all upset because you either (a can't understand a simple graph, or (b refuse to accept it (because it totally stuffs up your story about the increase in the number and severity of tropical storms...

Man up, and admit you drank the Gore-Coolaid and got conned.

i'M NOT A PSEPHOLOGIST

"bYE bYE TONY ABBOTT...!"

Nobody is "PSEPHOLOGIST", since that is a word you just made up, either out stupidity, or an inability to spell "psychologist"

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: * The QUEENSLAND election Vs Climate Change *
Reply #30 - Feb 3^rd, 2015 at 1:29am

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 9:18pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 3:04pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 2:58pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 2:23pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 7:39am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:41am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2015 at 1:03am:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 10:22pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 1^st, 2015 at 9:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 4:10pm:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 3:00pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:55pm:

lee wrote on Jan 30^th, 2015 at 2:54pm:

You would have to blame BOM for that; it's their graph. Or are you saying I should re-interpret for them?

You posted it... man up buddy Cheesy

So someone who posts a graph you don't like is 'wrong'???

Dear Einstein, graphs need to be labelled- end of story! Cheesy

It is quite clearly labelled.
yellow is non severe, red is severe.
Years along the bottom, and total number of storms for each year on the side...

and....

And any child who (successfully) passed 3rd class should have no trouble reading and understanding a simple bar graph Grin

But if it wasn't labelled correctly they would be asking a lot of questions Cheesy

However, since the graph lee posted WAS clearly and correctly labelled, that doesn't apply in this case.

Dr Gizmo is on the case: yes sir, hitler sir!

Cheesy

Don't get all upset because you either (a can't understand a simple graph, or (b refuse to accept it (because it totally stuffs up your story about the increase in the number and severity of tropical storms...

Man up, and admit you drank the Gore-Coolaid and got conned.

i'M NOT A PSEPHOLOGIST

"bYE bYE TONY ABBOTT...!"

Nobody is "PSEPHOLOGIST", since that is a word you just made up, either out stupidity, or an inability to spell "psychologist"

You mean tony abbott made it up at the press club ?? Cheesy

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged