Swagman wrote on Sep 9
th, 2014 at 10:33am:
John Smith wrote on Sep 9
th, 2014 at 9:43am:
Swagman wrote on Sep 9
th, 2014 at 8:58am:
John Smith wrote on Sep 8
th, 2014 at 10:59pm:
I agree with penalty rates, and would never propose abolishing them, but even I agree that some things need to be looked at
I was talking to someone who works as a traffic controller (they hold up the stop / go sign during road works etc)... one of the jobs they are working on is the Pacific Fair extensions on the Gold Coast. Because its a shopping centre and they want to keep trading, a lot of the work has to occur at night ... my traffic controller friend stands to get $75 per hour for doing night shift
I don't begrudge this person their money, good on them if they can get it, but $75 to hold up a stop/ go sign? Thats $600 per nioght, or $3000 per week (gross).
then people complain that property is Australia is expensive
There's slight hope for you yet Smithy.
whats the matter Swag, thrown you into a loop now that your pigeon holes don't fit?
I don't know anyone that isn't open to reasonalbe debate apart from those on the right. Calling for penalty rates to be abolished is not reasonible.
On the contrary it is the Left that won't budge on IR reform.
I am totally for common sense in this area.
There are many variables that may justify paying a higher rate of pay on Sunday's, at night, on public holidays etc. The left don't deal in variables though. The Left paints just about all situations with the one brush.
That is the "not reasonible" part Smithy.
"IR reform'? You mean IR change to suit business only? Are they so incapable of running their own business that they need Daddy/Mummy (DUMMY) government to intervene on their behalf and steal from their workers so they can make a profit?
Maybe they should consider taking a lower cut for themselves instead of wanting the whole pie.
How is the 'left' view that penalty rates apply to public holidays , shift work and weekends "applying the same brush to all"? Nobody is here demanding that penalty rates be applied to every working hour - the only demand here is for reductions to those with the lowest incomes through abolishing their penalty rates. Nobody here or elsewhere is demanding any "IR reform" to give MORE money - the only demand here is for reduction of income to some.
You don't see Tony or Andrei the Laugh a Minute or Fat Joe applying for "IR reform" to reduce their salary or perks payment for working odd hours etc, which is part of their salary and income. Same with all those on salaries, but, of course, as the 'better' class they should be exempt, right?
I'd hardly call that "IR reform" - just a demand from the ruling classes that their serfs be paid less.
$75 an hour to hold a traffic sign - SHOW ME! Maybe in the middle of the night on a public holiday in the pouring rain while underground in seepage and with the possibility of a falling roof..... as a casual......
Bullshit! (Just speaking plainly)....

BTW:- What 'variables' are there in working on Sunday, at midnight or on a public holiday?
What part of 'penalty rates for out of ordinary hours, etc' do you not understand?
So - a parking cop should get paid penalty for working nights or Sundays, but a pub worker shouldn't? One rule for some, another rule for others?
A guy working underground in a mine should not get penalty for working Sunday midnight on Christmas Day - but a cop should, or a nurse, or a fireman?
Where do you live, Swag?