tickleandrose wrote on Jun 25
th, 2014 at 8:09am:
Actually, I have been reading this topic this morning. From abc, it appeared that the person involved did not choose the topic. The topic was actually chosen for him by... someone. And that he indicated that his content would not be condoning killing of innocent woman / children.
I am actually quiet curious on what he have to say, see if he got any bright ideas, rather than quoting passages from the scripture, or blaming everything on local tradition. When I first read the topic: Honour Killings Are Morally Justified - I was think that he may tackle this from these point of view:
- Cultural or religious definition of innocent - there is alot of material that can be covered there.
- Historical context of honour killings Vs what was happening at the time.
- Cultural or religious definition of morality, and its application in modern secular society.
Its a shame, I really like controversial debates.
the trouble is.........as you can see on this thread alone...
not everyone takes what is said in the same way..
for this speech call it what you will... it is usually directed at those with extreme issues...
and can be turned into anything..even if that wasnt the intention.......look at those who are now wearing t/shirts and jackets applauding what is going on overseas.....they hold no fear...yet if someone walked around with a jacket condemning Islam... they would be dead I am sure...
this is where I fear our double standards will come back to bite us...
I am against anyone who bring their cultural hatreds to our shores..