Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 21
st, 2014 at 10:01am:
Kat wrote on Jun 21
st, 2014 at 9:14am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Jun 21
st, 2014 at 8:28am:
Kat wrote on Jun 21
st, 2014 at 8:03am:
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 21
st, 2014 at 7:50am:
This is from cjaustralia.com.
A site that declares itself as proudly anti Abbott and anti Liberal party.
It's just propaganda. Nothing more. This isn't news or from a credible site.
Doesn't mean it's wrong, though.
Stop shooting the messenger just because you don't like the message.
When it comes from a source like that, it isn't a message - it's a broken record!
Oh, you mean like your oft-repeated maligning of Swan?
Six budgets
Six deficits
Took over a budget in surplus and delivered a debt in his first year.
Swan was an utter cretin.
a) And Wonderboy Joe's first one isn't in deficit?
b) And Wonderboy Joe's next six will not be in deficit?
c) and any budget that runs loans is not in deficit?
d) And this justifies torturing those with little how exactly?
Every time you mumble about accountancy ideas, Andrei - you show yourself for a fraud.
I take it you're going to tell us the company you work for is NOT in deficit annually, but runs a mega-profit without any debt? And that the debt does not outweigh its annual income?
You see - that's what it's about - the total debt out-weighing the annual or budget period income - not the repayments outweighing the annual income - and we all know that in politics and in business it'[s all in the accounting standards and labeling.
Same as a house mortgage - while ever your debt outweighs your equity in the house - your account is in deficit - but that doesn't mean you are not keeping up the payments, and will not reach final payment day.
Bring on cods to tell me how hard that is to understand.... and you may now respond with .. "No... just no.. that is wrong".... and leave us hanging waiting for your wisdom in a valid answer.