OldnCrusty wrote on Apr 22
nd, 2014 at 12:18pm:
GA wrote on Apr 22
nd, 2014 at 12:05pm:
This is you. But the majority will always be needing to look up to some one as it's just part of our human nature.
Eh.

Has the discussion been about not looking up to any one. I'm saying if you are going to have heroes make sure they have substance and not all froth and bubble media productions.
What, Tony has substance? How about Gina and Clive? Sure they are 'substantial' but it's more to do with their physical size or the size of their wallets.
Quote:I'm also saying these are Poms and don't relate to our values or society. If you are going to have heroes make them worth while and make them Australian.
Grow up Australia, move on Australia.'
Aussie are the most British people outside of Britain itself.
And making them Australian is an option, we can have our own monarchy. It would be the logical progression if the Queen were to crown as her successor here, someone we've nominated. Doing this would give us as a country something truly meaningful, as opposed to the meaninglessness of 'Federation' or anything else that's simply legislated (as a republic would be).
Quote:GA wrote on Apr 22
nd, 2014 at 12:05pm:
And that' right they are 'born' into the role of public servants, so they can't really be 'blamed' for being what they are can they. And if any thing they fail by not standing up for the public more, Prince Charles being the exception to this as he has been outspoken on some of Britain's problems. But without the royals Britain would go into a irreversible decline.
Eh.

. A strange logic and at best these are Pommy justifications for the Royals (and there are Poms who would differ with you and I would probably agree).
Grow up Australia, move on Australia.
There are plenty of "poms" who I disagree with, these are the 'Briticans' that care more about image than they do for their country. The British would be the world's second worse patriots behind the Aussies, because all they care about now is trying to be like the Americans, whereas we are desperately trying to be British again.
Quote:GA wrote on Apr 22
nd, 2014 at 12:05pm:
They might have got away without them for a period hundreds of years ago, but not if it should ever happen again.
Eh
Cromwell and his Roundheads overthrew the British monarchy in 1649. And if for any reason the a monarch were ever deposed of again, it would be a setback that was irrecoverable. Once you do these kind of things it's difficult to re-instate them, and even if you do their meaningfulness is diminished.