911 Toronto hearings refuting the findings of 911 Commission, NIST and FEMA. Very authoritative and 5+ hour long video.

1

More evidence from pilots for 911 truth that Pentagon Aircraft Data Is Not From An American Airlines 757.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=21149

"... More than four years of solid research through Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) requests, numerous interviews and expert analysis has revealed no hard evidence supporting or linking to -- and in many instances factually conflicting with -- conclusions made by the 9/11 Commission. Now there is overwhelming evidence which suggests the data that is being provided to the public through the FOIA, is not from an aircraft which has been operated by American Airlines.

Pilots For 9/11 Truth analysis of data being provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has revealed the data does not support an impact with the Pentagon, exceeds the capabilities of a standard 757/767 by a wide margin, while demonstrating control issues for an "inexperienced pilot" (See 9/11: Attack On The Pentagon, 9/11: World Trade Center Attack, and Flight Of American 77). The data itself does not support what we have been told by the 9/11 Commission. When contacted, the NTSB and the FBI refused to comment. Pilots For 9/11 Truth went on to research if there was any evidence linking the data to N644AA (the aircraft described as "Flight 77"), once again, there is no evidence to support the government version of events(1). Research was also performed to determine if there was any evidence whatsoever linking the limited number of parts found at the Pentagon, to N644AA(2). In an unprecedented turn of events, the parts were never verified by any government agency for any of the four aircraft reported to have been used on 9/11. In all instances, there hasn't been any evidence provided by government agencies to support what we have been told by the 9/11 Commission. Further analysis reveals evidence demonstrating the data provided was not generated by an American Airlines airplane in the case of the attack on the Pentagon. ..."

Everything was pulverized. Concrete, steel office furniture, people, toilets and even the kitchen sink.

Wait, something did survive. The magic passport.

"...Both reports of workers at Ground Zero and photographs of the area attest to the thoroughness of the pulverization of the concrete and other non-metallic solids in the towers. 3   An examination of our extensive archives of images of Ground Zero and its immediate surroundings reveals no recognizable objects such as slabs of concrete, glass, doors, or office furniture. The identifiable constituents of the rubble can be classified into just five categories:

pieces of steel from the towers' skeletons
pieces of aluminum cladding from the towers' exteriors
unrecognizable pieces of metal
pieces of paper
dust
Despite the presence of 400,000 cubic yards of concrete in each tower, the photographs reveal almost no evidence of macroscopic pieces of its remains..." [/quote]

Each floor had the concrete stripped from the embedded steel reinforcement. A collapse could not have done that. Only explosives would provide that kind of force.

LOL!
This is what I said.
Each floor of the twin towers had the concrete stripped from the steel reinforcement. A collapse could not have done that. Only explosives would provide that kind of force.

Richdude wrote on Apr 1^st, 2014 at 12:26pm:


Yes we know.

They planted the explosives at smoko time when no one was looking.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2014 at 9:03am:


You mean that pulverization of steel and concrete not being attributable to fire is biased?