We know that the term 'pull it' means to bring the building down by means of explosives because in the same documentary a cleanup worker (in December 2001) refers to the demolition of WTC Building 6 when he says, "...we're getting ready to pull the building six."

listen here ..

http://www.prisonplanet.com/pullit2.mp3

This means that in direct contradiction to the official FEMA report, the goal of which was to find out why the building collapsed, the federal government had in fact demolished the building on the day of 9/11.

How did they manage to rig explosives in a matter of hours that would successfully and safely take down a 47 story building in a built-up and already chaotic area?

http://www.infowars.com/headline_photos/April/wtcbuilds.jpg

For over two years we have been asking the same question. Why did building 7 collapse? It wasn't even hit by anything save a small amount of debris. It was a whole block away from the burning twin towers. And yet it collapsed in exactly the same way - a perfect implosion - on the day of 9/11.

http://www.infowars.com/headline_photos/April/bd7.jpg

Here is a picture of building 7 at 3pm on September 11, two and a half hours before it collapsed. The lower portion of the building is darkened from the reflection of the other smaller building across the street. The only fires are on the 7th and 12th floors and are so small they could have been put out by the office sprinkler system. Why did Silverstein and the government make the decision to 'pull' the building when debris from it's collapse would hit the other buildings and start fires in them too?

Many people have claimed that the diesel fuel and emergency generators exploded within building 7 but even the FEMA report admitted that these remained fully intact. The FEMA report sought to explain how the building collapsed but could only conclude, “The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time.”

The report is available at http://www.fema.gov/library/wtcstudy.shtm .

Why did FEMA commission a report into how the building collapsed if it was already known that the government made the decision to destroy it on the evening of 9/11?

Video footage of the collapse of Building 7

http://www.infowars.com/print/Sept11/pp_fdny.htm

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2014 at 3:26pm:



Yeah, the term for firing a shot or charge be it a building or any other charge is to 'fire it', 'shoot it' or 'blow it'. No-one in the shot firing world uses the term "pull it".

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2014 at 3:12pm:



Hear hear Nail,
all just lies to get hold of Middle East oil.

Molten aluminium doesn't maintain an exothermic reaction for 3 months underground especially as you claim it cooled down and turned grey on the way down.

911 three buildings purportedly collapsing by fire when there has never previously and since been a steel building collapse from fire and probably never will be.

Building 7 wasn't even hit and purportedly had just office furniture low intensity fires.

Laugh till you cry wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2014 at 3:13pm:


Where is your evidence of molten steel 3 months later,molten steel is liquid steel and there was no liquid steel, a steel colour-temperature chart shows it is too cold for it to be liquid steel.
911myths.com/html/wtc_molten_steel.html

The falling towers produced a massive amount of kinetic energy, what happened to that energy was a fair % of it turned into heat?

Read a peer reviewed physics paper on the collapse of the towers,i reckon the nutjobs will be too stupid to comprehend what it says.
Mobile phones operate by using radio waves which came from the physics section with science.
911myths.com/WTCREPORT.pdf

Building 7 was hit there is footage of the hit in this thread, fires burned for over 7 hours with no effort to put them out because there was no water after the towers fell,the nutjobs are deaf dumb and blind.