Gnads wrote on Feb 23
rd, 2014 at 9:36am:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 23
rd, 2014 at 8:56am:
Gnads wrote on Feb 23
rd, 2014 at 8:50am:
Yet you still don't explain how an intact passport of a supposed hijacker is found amongst the fire & wreckage at ground zero.
Voort as far as Physics go .... no building collapses in it's own footprint from a random act of violence .............
let alone 3 of them in one day.
You play the gullible nutjob to a tee.
Quote:Doesn't need an explanation, all sorts of weird events occur (and are found) after major aircraft crashes. Unbroken glasses, children's dolls the only unburned thing pulled from the wreckage, undamaged spectacles, intact dentures etc, so an intact (or at least readable/recoverable) passport isn't all that surprising.
p.s That is providing the 'intact passport' thing even happened. After all most of the 'evidence' for the conspiracy seems to result from people taking bad acid trips.

I'm afraid it does need explaining Gizmoid .......this wasn't your run of the mill plane crash. This plane crashed into & inside a building ..... with an intense fireball ...... this fuel fireball was so hot that it supposedly melted immense steel columns.
That theory is proven false because steel melts at 2750 degrees & jet fuel burns at 1,400 degrees for only a brief time.
None the less if that passport was on said hijackers person & he was burned to ash ..... how did it survive that initial fireball & the subsequent blazes & collapse of the building?
The passport was found 2 blocks away on the ground before the towers collapsed,it was not subjected to the blazes and collapse of the buildings, it was from the first plane that hit the towers.
There were numerous other personal effects, body parts and plane parts found up to 5 blocks away, the nutjobs think all this stuff was planted.
Click on the links in this link-
www.911myths.com/index.php/Personal_Effects_and_the_Crash-Proof_PassportThe nutjobs insist the fire had to melt steel beams which shows their ignorance of basic metalwork.
Steel starts turning red around 500degC, it changes colour when heated-
navyaviation.tpub.com/14018/css/14018_663.htmThe modulus of elasticity or Young's modulus for steel is about 50% lower at 500 degC.
The modulus of elasticity tells you when the steel will go through inelastic deformations, the modulus of elasticity is lower than the Ultimate tensile or compressive strength, it is the stress level when things will not spring back to their original shape when the load is removed.
When you heat steel to 500deg c the modulus of elasticity is about 50% lower than say 20-30 deg c.
See figure 4 in this link-
www.academia.edu/346621/High-Temperature_Properties_of_Steel_for_Fire_Resistance...The other factor the brainless nutjobs ignore is the effect of thermal expansion on steel when heated,thermal expansion can cause compressive stress levels to rise and there are many photos of train tracks permanently buckled due to thermal expansion before they realised they should put gaps in the tracks to allow for thermal expansion.
The fact these buckled track lines do not return to their original shape when cooled down shows the compressive stress levels have gone beyond the young's modulus , ie an inelastic deformation.
There are numerous cases of train tracks buckling from temperature changes without any additional heat or fires.
Of course the nutjobs are ignorant of the fact thermal expansion of the steel from fires did play a significant role in the collapse of buildings on 911.
I have studied engineering at university so i can comprehend the peer reviewed reports on what caused the buildings to collapse on 911.
The nutjobs would be lucky to have half a brain between the lot of them and are totally bugger%ing clueless about basic metalwork concepts.
The nutjobs have nothing but nutjob theories with no substance to back it up.