it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 21
st, 2014 at 7:48pm:
There were light poles knocked out of the ground before the plane hit the Pentagon.
The plane hit these poles with port and starboard wings.
Can the nutjobs who claim it was a missile that hit the pentagon provide a link that proves missiles can zig zag to knock down these light poles?
There is no mechanism on a missile that would allow it to fly the zig zag path required to knock down these light poles, would impacting the light poles detonate a missile.
___________
many blessings ,
ignorance upon the detonated lightpoles
set up to fall as the missile left its imprint here
http://www.answering-christianity.com/no_jumbo_jet_hit_pentagon.jpghttp://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Terral03/TimelineChart.jpgstill does not explain building 7
namaste
- : ) =
Building 7 has been explained, the nutjobs ignore everything that does not conform to the nutjob theory.
A decoy plane knocked down the lightpoles...lmfao at the idiocy of the nutjobs.
The nutjob lunatics are defying physics again with their nutjob theory.
Newton's 3rd law- for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, this means whatever force was needed to knock down these lightpoles was also applied to the plane as a equal force in the opposite direction.
The nutjobs say the starboard wing knocked down these poles..
The NTSB has a huge database of planes crashing shortly after hitting power poles and even power lines, the nutjobs claim this decoy plane is the only plane to survive an impact with poles.
So what were these wings made from was it some special material called unobtainium?
I have studied Aeronautical engineering and there are no planes around that can withstand the impact from one lightpole without serious damage let alone multiple impacts with lightpoles, the NTSB has a huge database of plane crashes that resulted from impacting light poles.
A tomahawk missile is less than 2ft in diameter and about 18ft long, they are only fired from ships and subs, are the nutjobs suggesting the navy was involved, did they screen everyone to make sure there were no democRATS involved?
The entry hole looks a bit big for a tomahawk which could fit through a window, are the tomahawks designed to penetrate before exploding?
Your map shows where the nutjobs claim the tomahawk was about 1 second before impact, a tomahawk is subsonic so the nutjobs have exposed their idiocy on this one, was this a super dooper tomahawk that could go supersonic?
Missile bow shockwave?
,Tomahawks are subsonic there is no bow shockwave.
If you look at the pictures there are bits of the plane on the lawn that were probably ripped off when the plane hit the light poles which is what you would expect with Newton's 3rd law.
911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagon speaking of nutjob theories have you found the Weapons of Mass Deception in Iraq or are you still looking for them ?
And what about the mobile chemical weapons labs in Iraq the only evidence of which is a cartoon picture from cooollin powell
Has anyone seen the mobile chemical weapons labs in Iraq ? It is supposed to look this
LOL Please report back if you find one. I think I saw Bin Empty driving one down the Monash freeway the other day
Forum
Pages: 
911 was an inside job by Bush insiders (Read 267237 times)
