Bobby. wrote on Feb 21^st, 2014 at 7:10pm:


and what happened to all of the CCTV videos from the neighbouring petrol station and hotel ?

Can we have a look at them and not the CGI version that looks like a blur ?

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 21^st, 2014 at 7:11pm:


Dear master Light, & all readers,
just as Roosevelt knew about the Pearl Harbor attack before it happened
& didn't tell the people in charge in Hawaii -

I think George Bush knew & didn't pass the info on.

Roosevelt wanted America to have a strong excuse to get into a war with Japan
so he let it happen.
Churchill was thrilled after Pearl Harbor.
America was finally in the war & was England's trump card.


The conspiracy theory here is that George Bush wanted an excuse
to go to war with terrorists & to control Middle East Oil.
Maybe he didn't realise how devastating it was going to be?

Bobby. wrote on Feb 21^st, 2014 at 7:10pm:


The nutjobs are moving onto the Pentagon....

There were light poles knocked out of the ground before the plane hit the Pentagon.
The plane hit these poles with port and starboard wings.

Can the nutjobs who claim it was a missile that hit the pentagon provide a link that proves missiles can zig zag to knock down these light poles?

There is no mechanism on a missile that would allow it to fly the zig zag path required to knock down these light poles, would impacting the light poles detonate a missile.

Security cameras are not high speed slow motion cameras, how many frames per second does a 10 year old security camera record at and what resolution are these pictures?
At 500 knots a plane is travelling 255 meters per second i doubt our speed or red light cameras can get something going that fast.

There were light poles knocked out of the ground before the plane hit the Pentagon.
The plane hit these poles with port and starboard wings.

Can the nutjobs who claim it was a missile that hit the pentagon provide a link that proves missiles can zig zag to knock down these light poles?

There is no mechanism on a missile that would allow it to fly the zig zag path required to knock down these light poles, would impacting the light poles detonate a missile.

___________

many blessings ,

ignorance upon the detonated lightpoles

set up to fall as the missile left its imprint here






still does not explain building 7

namaste

- : ) =

it_is_the_light wrote on Feb 21^st, 2014 at 7:45pm:



Many blessings to you too master Light,

It doesn't take much effort to put 2 & 2 together.

Bush knew something was up but he wanted a war.

Even as the administration exploited this Official Story (or “Official Conspiracy Theory”) as the pretext to launch new wars long in the making, independent researchers began to accumulate a vast body of evidence suggesting a different narrative for 9/11: that of the False Flag Operation.

The 9/11 events and the anomalies in the official story raised Unanswered Questions about:

the unprecedented failure of the US air defense system on the morning of the attacks;
the AWOL military chain of command during the actual attacks, including the inexplicable behavior of the presidential entourage;
the seeming impossibility of official claims with regard to Flight 77;
the evidence that Flight 93 was shot down;
contradictions and dubious evidence in the official claims about the alleged hijackers and masterminds, and doubts about their real identities;
signs that the alleged hijackers enjoyed high-level protection against discovery by honest investigators;
evidence that the alleged hijackers were financed by states allied with US intelligence;
suspicious and massive international financial trades suggesting foreknowledge of the attacks;
widespread signs of official foreknowledge and, in fact, advance preparation for the 9/11 attack scenario;
the long-running links between Islamist fundamentalist terror cells and US covert operations, dating back to CIA support for the anti-Soviet mujahedeen and Osama Bin Ladin himself;
the demolition-like collapse of the Twin Towers and of a third skyscraper, WTC 7;
and questions concerning who could have logically expected to derive benefit in the aftermath of a massive attack on the United States.
The suspicions received further confirmation a few weeks after September 11th, with the arrival of anthrax letters targeted only at opposition politicians and media figures, and timed to coincide with the introduction of the USA PATRIOT Act.

Already within those first weeks, loose networks of researchers and investigators formed via the Internet to generally become known as the “9/11 skeptics.” They presented substantial bodies of evidence to show that elements within the US government must have been involved in facilitating or orchestrating the attacks – in other words, that 9/11 was possibly a classic case of “false-flag” or synthetic terrorism, such as corrupt states have often perpetrated on their own citizens.

http://www.911truth.org/

Quote:


Now you know that can't be done, it would be too discriminating and truth would then be known. 

These 2 videos below are worthy of viewing and discussion.
With the 2nd video clip, just bare in mind, the Boston Bombings, on closer inspection of those that are photo shop manipulators and those that are even more vigil of photoshopping errors.....when the photo of the alleged bombers were in the background, walking behind the crowd, I have to find that pic, to show what I mean, the feet were not done in line with the body, and someone else's shoes going in an opposite direction were in place...it was so disjointed, busted if anything, as a fake photo to implicate that 19 yr old. But that's another matter. 

http://video.creode.co/never-aired-pentagon-911-video-hd-where-is-the-boeing-video_c9ef54877.html

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/162172/Busted_911_videos_were_FAKED__100__PROOF/

Sophia wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2014 at 11:43am:


The problem with these videos here:



is that they use jpeg compression algorithms which do something to moving objects.
The video is unreliable as moving objects get treated differently to stationary in order to reduce the file size.
Without knowing exactly what compression algorithm was used - in the original frames -
it is impossible to make any truthful
statements relating to it.

None of the videos on youtube ever discuss this compression problem.