Lionel Edriess wrote on Jul 5
th, 2015 at 3:12pm:
And whenever was Australian society 'monocultural', Brian? It was a melange of misfits and criminals from day one - that eventually shaped itself into the quite unique 'Australian' ethos that had become recognisable worldwide.
Or, at least, it used to be.
Was it our 'monocultural' society that led those two Muslims to ambush a train of civilian picnicers at Broken Hill in 1915? Or was it something else? Something that is recognisable, even today?
And that's what we 'Australians' kick up about - the gradual dilution of that "Australian" character. The decay of that once great society where the battller could have a fair go and you didn't kick a man when he was down.
A mythos that never existed, Lionel. Australian society was monocultural in that it was drawn primarily (but not exclusively) from the British Isles. Even there though, there was a definite pecking order, with the Irish and the Welsh at the bottom, followed by the Scots and of course, preceded over by the English. Always remember what Reverend Samuel Marsden said about the Irish, Lionel.
Drawing a similar source invariably resulted in similar outlooks. Not always a good outcome resulted.
Quote:The guns at Port Arthur weren't the problem, Brian. It was the idiot that this decaying society had fostered.
So, you'd have preferred that he be abandoned and left to starve, Lionel? His attitudes were created by the society that surrounded him - primarily white, Anglo-Saxon/Celtic settler descended and of course, actually privileged.
Quote:At what point in time did having pride in a national identity become something to sneer about?
When we are lambasted with it continuously in all theatres of life, Lionel. I am proud of being an Australian, I don't need see the need to force it down everybody's throat continuously as you and others appear to. Nor do I feel the need to have a gun. Funny that.