Stratos wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2014 at 11:56pm:


Thank you for so convincingly confirming my my estimation of your participation in this forum, while relieving me of feeling any need to waste any more time with you.

Stratos wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 12:06am:


Thank you! I did indeed!
So why are you so afraid to admit you are a Muslim anyway? Too embarrassed?

Stratos wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 12:10am:


I don't have any evidence, other than your being perhaps the greatest champion for Muhammadanism, in this forum.
I was simply trying to solicit an honest admission from you. And I didn't notice a denial.

But then since for a Muslim to lie about being a Muslim, and deny it, is of course the most universally accepted form of taqiyyah, or lying in the way of Muhammad's alter-ego "Allah" anyway.
So it would be moot to ask such a question of a Muslim.
Though lying of all kinds is so acceptable throughout the Islamic world today, it really doesn't lend itself to categorization.
falseprophetmuhammad.com/global_war_against_truth.htm#taqiyyah

Stratos wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 12:26am:


First of all, if you are referring to Muslims that are engaged in the Islamic conquest of the world as being extreme, that is patently false. Those are true fundamental followers of Muhammad, doing as Muhammad did, and commanded his followers to do.
brotherpete.com/jihad_conquest_terrorism.htm

Though no shortage of Muslims are content to leave the heavy lifting of Jihad to their brethren, not having the stomach for it. Muhammad had an answer for those hypocrites too:

Al-Baqara, Chapter #2, Verse #216 fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.

CNS reports: "Sunni Muslim terrorists committed “about 70 percent” of the 12,533 terrorist murders in the world last year, according to a report by the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC)."
That's for the year 2011, and that percentage doesn't even include Shiite Muslim terrorist murders. Thus it should be obvious to all non-Muslims, that the world would be largely at peace today, if the followers of Muhammad had not been commanded to "fight and slay" non-Muslims in the "cause" of "Allah".

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 12:17am:


Thank you for sparing me having to wonder about it any more. Not that it much matters since you are under the influence of Satan as well. And while you may not believe in Satan, I've every confidence he believes in you, my friend.

Stratos wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 12:26am:


Again demonstrating that you are just as disconnected from reality as Muhammad's followers are.
Like when Muhammad's dissimulators pretend that Psalms 84 is a reference to God's people wandering across 1200 kilometers of harsh barren desert - over a thousand years before a caravan route was established along the Red Sea and a couple thousand years before Mecca was established - to march around the Quraish pagan's black stone idol a few times, and then wander the 1200 kilometers back home.

The liars for Islam are so overt, that no matter how many times the location pin "in Zion" is edited back into the Psalms 84 passage that they lie about, they edit the truth right back out and continue pretending it is about Mecca!
This particular lie isn't some random guys, but comes directly from the buffoonery of Islam's Greek sophist styled entertainers and lying antichrists like Ahmed Deedat and Yusuf Estes.

I offered the link to you by way of explanation, as to the free-for-all of lying in the way of "Allah", Muhammadans are actually engaged in:
falseprophetmuhammad.com/global_war_against_truth.htm#taqiyyah

Stratos wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 12:52am:


Repeating your false premise, only further confirms that your reading and comprehension skills are considerably compromised.
Your false premise is how you demonstrated your critical thinking skills to be inadequate, through your abject failure to understand a simple post. Why don't you try reading the post again, and honestly try to understand the point that it is actually making?
ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1388621936/11#11

While you're at it, why don't you visit my prior post that you snatched that little piece of, and instead of running away from the content, actually try a paragraph by paragraph exegesis of it? Which was, of course, where the point was made and supported initially.
ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1388621936/9#9

Stratos wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 12:52am:


I don't need to insist on the Arabic term "taqiyyah", since the terms "dissimulation" and "lying" are just as descriptive of the REALITY, and thus just as acceptable to me.
falseprophetmuhammad.com/global_war_against_truth.htm#taqiyyah

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 1:08am:


You made an unsubstantiated claim, I questioned it, then you said

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2014 at 11:35pm:


So back to my original point, what is your problem with head coverings, seeing as an undercover agent in a mosque decided that was damning evidence for some reason, and you felt so outraged about it that you posted it on an internet forum in bold no less like it was some kind of revelation..

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2014 at 1:08am:


so now you are ignoring the Koran, making another of your arguments hypocritical.  Are you now arguing that people are lying and deceiving regardless of what the Koran states?  Because it definitely does not state that taqiyya is how you are describing it, not even close.

I wonder why you are so willing to use the Koran as damning evidence when it suits you, and ignore it when it suits you too.

Oh that's right, it's because your views are blatantly bigoted towards Muslims.

You said in reference to people wearing head covering, (don't know how to link posts, so I'll do the whole thing)

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 2^nd, 2014 at 11:24pm:


Linking an increase is head coverings to Islamic Jihad through the people who are behind the increase.  If an increase of hat devotees is the best evidence, then that is pretty shonky indeed

Oh, you still haven't said what your problem with head coverings is by the way.

Hilarious. 

In consecutive sentences you say that the head covering wearing is linked to Saudi Imana, and then say that "Just as the same guys built mosques and Islamic centers all around the world, as planning centers for the imperialistic conquest of Islamic Jihad."  and somehow you can't see the link between the two?

Also when I questioned the link between the two in my original post, you disagreed with me,

Quote:


Also, how about you address the other questions at hand you are ignoring:

What is wrong with headscarves?
Why is your definition about taqiyya incorrect as it appears in the Koran?