Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Islam's ONLY UNFORGIVABLE Sin of "Shirk" (Read 9474 times)
Stratos
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4725
Re: Islam's ONLY UNFORGIVABLE Sin of "Shirk"
Reply #30 - Jan 1st, 2014 at 12:40am
 
Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 12:37am:
Because, as you wold have learned if you had read and been able to comprehend the OP, Islam's only unforgivable sin of "shirk", is the epitome of the manifestation of the spirit of antichrist.
falseprophet


yes, but your reasons against it are because of your own personal beliefs against Islam. 

Also, there is not exactly a consensus that states that it is unforgivable, just that you need to repent of it BEFORE you die or it cannot be forgiven between death and what comes next.

Is it the fact it is seen as unforgiveable that you don't like it?
Back to top
 

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15th, 2014 at 11:24pm:
Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act
 
IP Logged
 
Pete Waldo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 503
U.S.
Gender: male
Re: Islam's ONLY UNFORGIVABLE Sin of "Shirk"
Reply #31 - Jan 1st, 2014 at 1:04am
 
Stratos wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 12:40am:
Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 12:37am:
Because, as you wold have learned if you had read and been able to comprehend the OP, Islam's only unforgivable sin of "shirk", is the epitome of the manifestation of the spirit of antichrist.
falseprophet


yes, but your reasons against it are because of your own personal beliefs against Islam. 

Also, there is not exactly a consensus that states that it is unforgivable, just that you need to repent of it BEFORE you die or it cannot be forgiven between death and what comes next.

Thank you! That's the whole point. Muhammad's followers must then believe, that each and every Christian throughout the entirety of the last nearly 2,000 years,
has lived AND DIED
in a state of committing Muhammad's only unforgivable sin
, because we confess that Jesus is the Son of God and pray in Jesus name as the Gospel instructs us to do. That is how we are connected to God, through the Holy Spirit, that He sent in Jesus' name. We recognize the hundreds of verses that regard the Father and His Son.

1Jo 4:15 Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him, and he in God.

It is the very doctrine of Christ itself:

2John 1:9 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.

We follow all of the prophets and witnesses in the 1600 year record of our great God YHWH to mankind, which is the exact opposite of following the false prophet Muhammad alone, as Muhammad's followers do. This is why Muhammad's sin of "shirk" brings perfect clarity to the
OPPOSITES
of Islam and the Gospel.


Your point helps illustrate how we can know that Islam is THE EXACT OPPOSITE of the Gospel not only through the scriptures, but in conjunction with 1400 years of Muhammad and his follower's murder, mayhem, misery, slavery, thievery, abuse of prisoners, women and little girls, making Muhammad a shoe-in for THE false prophet that was prophesied in the book of Revelation, and his Islamic kingdom "beast" the final foe of God's people.
beholdthebeast.com/the_beast.htm

The PERFECT OPPOSITE of that revealed through the Gospel.
christianeschatology.com/historicism.htm#the_false_prophet

Stratos wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 12:40am:
Is it the fact it is seen as unforgiveable that you don't like it?

I don't like any manifestation of the spirit of ANTICHRIST, and do what I can to help lead those so sorely deluded overcome Muhammad, because I am a CHRISTian and that is what I have been called to labor in.

John 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.

Though I haven't yet been called to witness to willful unregenerates such as yourself, just those deceived into believing they worship the God of the scriptures, when they quite demonstrably have instead been deceived into following the 7th century false prophet Muhammad alone.
falseprophetmuhammad.com/

Can Islam even be considered a religion when we honestly consider the definition of the term "cult"?
youtube.com/watch?v=ujUOZyrnewE
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 1st, 2014 at 3:54am by Pete Waldo »  

Truth can never be told so as to be understood and not be believed. ~ William Blake
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pete Waldo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 503
U.S.
Gender: male
Re: Islam's ONLY UNFORGIVABLE Sin of "Shirk"
Reply #32 - Jan 1st, 2014 at 2:34am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 31st, 2013 at 9:49am:
I'm not really sure where (if anywhere) in the islamic texts it says shirk is the greatest sin.

Its easy to see why it was emphasised so heavilly during Prophet Muhammad's time though - the people during that time did worship Allah, and recognised him as the supreme God.

The historical and archaeological records regarding the etymology of the name "Allah" indicate it was the name of their moon god (coupled with the fact that there is no record of the Arabic language existing prior to the Christian era).

Quoting from first language Arabic Dr. Rafat Amari's 20-year full-time study of Islam and Arabian history and archaeology, "Islam: In Light of History", on the etymology of the name "Allah":

"We know that the term 'Allah,' as the god of the moon, was derived from the Thamud god of the moon. His name was Hilal, or Hlal, which means 'crescent.' Later, the name 'Hilal' became Hilah, as we see in many inscriptions which were found in Arabia. In the Thamud inscriptions he is found as H-ilah, Ha-ilah and H-alah. We see the same development for 'Hilah,' the moon deity in Yemen, where Almaqah is called 'Halal,' or 'Hilal, the Crescent.'"
falseprophetmuhammad.com/the_name_allah.htm#etymology_name_allah

Harranian Sabian worship of their moon god is where Ramadan comes from:
falseprophetmuhammad.com/origin_of_ramadan.htm

The pagan's shouted "Allah Akbar" which meant that their moon god was the greatER or greatEST of all of their Arabian Star Family deities.

polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 31st, 2013 at 9:49am:
However they also set up subordinate partners to him, and set up all the idols for worship inside the Kabaa. So even these "polytheists" were basically on the "right" path according to islam, .......

No surprise there, since Muhammad adopted, adapted and thinly veneered the Quraish pagan's moon, sun star and jinn-devil worship rituals so he could keep Kaaba Inc going.
brotherpete.com/hajj___umrah.htm#al_safa_al_marwah

polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 31st, 2013 at 9:49am:
....... but for this innovation of setting up these idols - which was only a relatively new innovation on the original "true" religion of Abraham, which the people of Arabia never really fully abandoned. Thus Muhammad's mission was more about reminding the people of their heritage, ........

In order to make this scripture-contrary, geographically impossible, claim of "heritage", and Abraham ever having had anything whatsoever to do with Muhammadanism, you need to support it through other than Islamic so-called Islamic "tradition", that was all created and put to the pen from 100 to 300 years after Muhammad died (7th to 10th centuries AD), without reference to any actual historical record that preceded the 5th century AD.
historyofmecca.com/geography_mecca_islam.htm#zamzam

I would sure appreciate if you weighed in on the thread dedicated to this subject.
ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1388067196

polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 31st, 2013 at 9:49am:
........ and pointing out that Allah was not merely the best of many gods, but the only one true God - rather than introducing a completely new religion.

Interestingly, its said that when Muhammad took Mecca and destroyed the idols in the Kabaa, he left one in there - a statue of the virgin Mary.

How idolatrous that would have been of him (and the Roman Church)!

But your suggestion is disconnected from reality. Muhammad got rid of all the idols but one all right, and that is the Quraish pagan's black stone idol, that you prostrate toward five times a day. It cannot be denied that the Quraish pagans venerated that black stone idol before Muhammad was ever born.

Please don't let this post distract you from the very important information in my prior post to you:
ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1388407613/19#19
And in this post to Stratos:
ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1388407613/18#18
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 1st, 2014 at 3:37am by Pete Waldo »  

Truth can never be told so as to be understood and not be believed. ~ William Blake
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Stratos
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4725
Re: Islam's ONLY UNFORGIVABLE Sin of "Shirk"
Reply #33 - Jan 1st, 2014 at 7:09am
 
Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 1:04am:
Thank you! That's the whole point. Muhammad's followers must then believe, that each and every Christian throughout the entirety of the last nearly 2,000 years, has lived AND DIED in a state of committing Muhammad's only unforgivable sin, because we confess that Jesus is the Son of God and pray in Jesus name as the Gospel instructs us to do. That is how we are connected to God, through the Holy Spirit, that He sent in Jesus' name. We recognize the hundreds of verses that regard the Father and His Son.


So according to a Muslim you aren't a Muslim.... Do you extend the same courtesies to whos belief you also don't subscribe to?  There are many, not just Islam that have rules you don't follow either.  Why do you even care if you do not believe in Islam whether you break their rules or nor?

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 1:04am:
The PERFECT OPPOSITE of that revealed through the Gospel.


That everything can be forgiven?  because Shirk can be forgiven in Islam according to most, as long as you repent before you die.

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 1:04am:
I don't like any manifestation of the spirit of ANTICHRIST, and do what I can to help lead those so sorely deluded overcome Muhammad, because I am a CHRISTian and that is what I have been called to labor in.


Oh right, it must be wrong because you say so.  Not exactly a convincing argument.  Also, what have you got against pagan beliefs anyway?  I mean from an objective point of view, not a subjective one.
Back to top
 

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15th, 2014 at 11:24pm:
Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Islam's ONLY UNFORGIVABLE Sin of "Shirk"
Reply #34 - Jan 1st, 2014 at 7:36am
 
Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 2:34am:
Muhammad adopted, adapted and thinly veneered the Quraish pagan's moon, sun star and jinn-devil worship rituals so he could keep Kaaba Inc going.


...or could it be that the Quraish pagans had adapted the the monotheism of Abraham that had come before them?

When religious leaders adopt systems and institutions that are familiar to the people that leader is attempting to convert, its not necessarily a sign of a fraud. Just like the christians adopted a whole host of Greek/Roman pagan rituals as a ploy to make the transformation of the people smoother. By the way, the concept of the "sacrifice for our sins" has roots in pre-christian pagan mythology.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
wally1
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2055
Gender: male
Re: Islam's ONLY UNFORGIVABLE Sin of "Shirk"
Reply #35 - Jan 1st, 2014 at 7:42am
 
So yadda, we can both agree that no human has seen God and only those who are worthy of seeing god will see god when they die.

So Abraham nor any prophet saw God, and even if I was to believe that Abraham saw God, Abraham probabaly saw angels dressed as man and not God himself.

So the bible is wrong on that account that people have seen God.

And you say muslims see the bible as corrupt?

They do have a point, the bible is full of mistakes, contradictions and errors, so the muslims have a right to slam the current bible which is not the word of god.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sparky
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1338
Gender: male
Re: Islam's ONLY UNFORGIVABLE Sin of "Shirk"
Reply #36 - Jan 1st, 2014 at 7:52am
 
wally1 wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 7:42am:
So yadda, we can both agree that no human has seen God and only those who are worthy of seeing god will see god when they die.

So Abraham nor any prophet saw God, and even if I was to believe that Abraham saw God, Abraham probabaly saw angels dressed as man and not God himself.

So the bible is wrong on that account that people have seen God.

And you say muslims see the bible as corrupt?

They do have a point, the bible is full of mistakes, contradictions and errors, so the muslims have a right to slam the current bible which is not the word of god.
The Muslims won't believe the bible and the Christians won't believe the Koran. Move on .
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pete Waldo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 503
U.S.
Gender: male
Re: Islam's ONLY UNFORGIVABLE Sin of "Shirk"
Reply #37 - Jan 1st, 2014 at 9:48pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 7:36am:
Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 2:34am:
Muhammad adopted, adapted and thinly veneered the Quraish pagan's moon, sun star and jinn-devil worship rituals so he could keep Kaaba Inc going.

...or could it be that the Quraish pagans had adapted the the monotheism of Abraham that had come before them?

No that cannot be, on so many levels, the first being the geographical impossibility of Abraham ever having been within 1,000 kilometers of where Mecca was eventually built a couple thousand years after Abraham. Recognizing this very physical impossibility is why Tabari invented the notion that Abraham and Ishmael regularly flew back and forth, the 1200 kilometers between Abraham's home in Hebron and Mecca, on magic flying donkey-mules or Buraqs. Like the one that Muhammad claimed to have ridden on one night to Jerusalem, up to the "paradise" of his overactive imagination, and then back to Mecca by morning. Muhammad even claimed he prayed in the temple in Jerusalem on that trip, while the actual historical record tells us that temple had been torn down over 500 years prior to, his entirely unwitnessed and ridiculous tall tale.
brotherpete.com/mohammeds_night_journey.htm

You and I both know that the reason you failed to reply to "The History of Mecca" thread as I requested, is because in fact, there is not a shred of historical or archaeological evidence that suggests that Mecca ever existed prior to the 4th century AD.
ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1388067196

This even though other even tiny towns, that came and went within a few centuries before the Christian era, are well attested in the historical and archaeological records of Arabia.

Mecca being located 1200 kilometers away from THE Holy Land of the prophets and patriarchs, and Abraham living over a thousand years before a caravan route was established along the Red Sea in Arabia, makes it a geographical impossibility that Abraham was ever within a thousand kilometers of where Mecca was eventually settled, a couple thousand years after Abraham roamed the earth.
historyofmecca.com/geography_mecca_islam.htm

I'll post a thread on the subject to help disabuse you of the preposterous wishful notions you have been fed by a bunch of semi-literate 7th to 10th century AD, SW Arabian desert dwellers, that lived thousands of years after the thousands of years of phony supposed history they created from thin air.

The families of both Khadijah and Muhammad were deeply involved in the occult.
religionresearchinstitute.org/Mohammad/occultism.htm

Since Mecca did not exist prior to the 4th century AD, and the kaaba wasn't built until the early 5th century, there was not enough time for what you suggest, particularly since Abraham had been dead for a couple thousand years before Mecca was settled.

Let alone that the ACTUAL historical and archaeological records confirm that Abraham was never outside of the Fertile Crescent, and never within 1,000 kilometers of where Mecca was eventually settled in the 4th century AD, a couple thousand years after Abraham walked the earth.

Even some of Muhammad's closest followers hated performing the Sa'ee because they had performed the same ritual in Arabian jinn-devil worship, before Muhammad told them his alter-ego "Allah" said it was alright to continue the jinn-devil worship ritual.

Narrated 'Asim: I asked Anas bin Malik: "Did you use to dislike to perform Tawaf between Safa and Marwa?" He said, "Yes, as it was of the ceremonies of the days of the Pre-lslamic period of ignorance, till Allah revealed: 'Verily! (The two mountains) As-Safa and Al-Marwa are among the symbols of Allah. It is therefore no sin for him who performs the pilgrimage to the Ka'ba, or performs 'Umra, to perform Tawaf between them.' " (2.158) (Sahih al-Bukhari 2 Book 26 710)
brotherpete.com/hajj_umrah.htm#al_safa_al_marwah

But then Muhammad also told them that his alter-ego "Allah" lavished on him all the wives he desired - but only for him. Told them that his "Allah" gave him 1/5 of the "booty", but only for him - "booty" being stolen fruit of the labor of others and newly minted sex slaves. They didn't work for a living so they had to steal from productive people. Muhammad's alter-ego "Allah" even gave him a special "revelation" that allowed him to steal his step-sons only wife.

What a gem that guy was.

Bukhari B59 #459 Narrated Ibn Muhairiz: I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Said Al-Khudri and sat beside him and asked him about Al-Azl (i.e. coitus interruptus). Abu Said said, "We went out with Allah's Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus......"

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 7:36am:
When religious leaders adopt systems and institutions that are familiar to the people that leader is attempting to convert, its not necessarily a sign of a fraud.

No, like I said, Muhammad wanted to profit from Kaaba Inc. the way his uncle had.
prophetofdoom.net/Prophet_of_Doom_24_Profitable_Prophet_Plan.Islam
Back to top
 

Truth can never be told so as to be understood and not be believed. ~ William Blake
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pete Waldo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 503
U.S.
Gender: male
Re: Islam's ONLY UNFORGIVABLE Sin of "Shirk"
Reply #38 - Jan 1st, 2014 at 10:44pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 7:36am:
When religious leaders adopt systems and institutions that are familiar to the people that leader is attempting to convert, its not necessarily a sign of a fraud. Just like the christians adopted .......


Constantine did, from having been a pagan sun worshiper previously, and thus the solar blazes and such of the Roman Church. Some question as to whether he was ever a Christian, but was more in bondage to his flesh, since he waited until he was on his death bed to be baptized. A good read on the subject of how paganism crept into part of the "church" is "Pagan Christianity" by Frank Viola.

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 7:36am:
..... a whole host of Greek/Roman pagan rituals as a ploy to make the transformation of the people smoother.


Thank you for your tacit admission that Muhammad did in fact keep Kaaba Inc. going to keep the pagan's interested in fattening the coffers, as Muslims continue to do for Saudi Arabia unto this day, and as pagan Star Family worshipers did long before Muhammad was born. Men will do what men do.

Certainly the Gospel does not allow such deception.

Rom 3:7 8 And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.

Nor does the one true God of the scriptures of Jews and Christians need lies, nor anything more than His Word:

Hebrews 4:12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

Since Jesus IS truth, the only way we can follow Him is in all truth:

John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 7:36am:
By the way, the concept of the "sacrifice for our sins" has roots in pre-christian pagan mythology.


While the Canaanites sacrificed children to idols, it certainly wasn't for remission of sin.
And your ignorance of the revelation of the one true God of the scriptures - YHWH - is appalling, for someone that engages in religious discussion. The concept of sacrifice for sin did indeed long predate the Christian era. That was of course the whole purpose of the alter in the temple that Yahweh had His people build on the temple mount in Jerusalem.

Leviticus 17:11 For the life of the flesh [is] in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it [is] the blood [that] maketh an atonement for the soul.

blueletterbible.org/search/search.cfm?Criteria=atonement+sin&t=KJV#s=s_primary_0
_1

And the sacrifice of the Lamb of God was prophesied many hundreds of years before the event, and even hundreds of years before crucifixion was ever even invented:

Psalms 22:1 My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?
16 For dogs have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me: they pierced my hands and my feet.   17 I may tell all my bones: they look [and] stare upon me.   18 They part my garments among them, and cast lots upon my vesture.
islamandthetruth.com/psalms_22.htm#psalms_22_16

Fulfilled just as prophesied:
Matthew 27:35 And they crucified him, and parted his garments, casting lots: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, They parted my garments among them, and upon my vesture did they cast lots.

Isaiah 53:5 But he [was] wounded for our transgressions, [he was] bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace [was] upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.   6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.   7 He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened not his mouth: he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth.   8 He was taken from prison and from judgment: and who shall declare his generation? for he was cut off out of the land of the living: for the transgression of my people was he stricken.
islamandthetruth.com/isaiah_53.htm

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 7:36am:
Just like the christians adopted a whole host of Greek/Roman pagan rituals as a ploy to make the transformation of the people smoother.


Men creating unchristian counter-gospel tradition accomplished the exact opposite, as you yourself, aptly demonstrate. Particularly the Roman church murder of Jews and Muslims - but as most conveniently leave out - Roman Church murder of CHRISTIANS as well.
homecomers.org/mirror/

Thus people who desire to run and hide from God, wish to believe that murder of innocents is what Christianity is about, when in fact the Gospel is about the exact opposite, and loving even our enemies. The Godless thus blinded by Satan to what Christians are actually doing:
Like bringing hope and healing around the world
mercyships.org
Freeing Islam's slaves:
youtube.com/watch?v=l1j8D1j9mEc

Many of Muhammad's followers also wishing that murder and rape is of the Lord, since Muhammad had innocent, peaceful, faithful Jewish farm boys brought before him and beheaded, while he and his boys had their way with their little sisters, moms and grandmothers - let alone Muhammad's imperialistic conquest.
Back to top
 

Truth can never be told so as to be understood and not be believed. ~ William Blake
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Stratos
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4725
Re: Islam's ONLY UNFORGIVABLE Sin of "Shirk"
Reply #39 - Jan 1st, 2014 at 10:55pm
 
Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 10:44pm:
Psalms 22:1 My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?
16 For dogs have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me: they pierced my hands and my feet.   17 I may tell all my bones: they look [and] stare upon me.   18 They part my garments among them, and cast lots upon my vesture


That's a piece of poetry, not a prophesy.  Who's to say that didn't later influence what was written down in scripture?  Or going by your own yardstick, does that mean we can take everything is Psalms as a prophecy? 

Oh, could we get back onto the title topic?  I think we're getting a bit off track.


Back to top
 

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15th, 2014 at 11:24pm:
Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act
 
IP Logged
 
Pete Waldo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 503
U.S.
Gender: male
Re: Islam's ONLY UNFORGIVABLE Sin of "Shirk"
Reply #40 - Jan 5th, 2014 at 1:37am
 
wally1 wrote on Dec 31st, 2013 at 2:38pm:
Your alittle confused my friend.

Christians see the spirit as a diety, a figure, a god like figure.


Why just dither on in your own empty false words Wally? Christians understand that God has a Spirit, just as Jews do.

Genesis 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.

It is how God reveals Himself in men:

Exd 31:3 And I have filled him with the spirit of God, in wisdom, and in understanding, and in knowledge, and in all manner of workmanship,

The Quran also acknowledges that Muhammad's alter-ego "Allah" has a spirit:

Sura 15.29: "When I have fashioned him (in due proportion) and breathed into him of
My spirit
, fall ye down in obeisance unto him."

Thus by the same measure that Muslims apply to Christians,
Muslims are polytheistic hypocrites
, since they believe in two parts of what has been dubbed the "trinity". Believing in God and believing that God has a Spirit.
falseprophetmuhammad.com/the_trinity.htm

The Spirit of God that was sent in Jesus name, is how Christians are connected to God through His Spirit, when Christians are born again.

John 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

It is how we become a part of the temple of God: Ephesians 2:19 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God; 20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner [stone]; 21 In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord: 22 In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.

No surprise then that Satan, through his "messenger" Muhammad, has convinced Muhammad's followers that to pray in Jesus name is to commit the ONLY UNFORGIVABLE SIN in Muhammadanism. A sin worse than cold-blooded mass murder, or child rape for example, which may be forgiven (and both of which Muhammad happened to be guilty of).

Does a god that would make praying in Jesus name - as each and every Christian has done for nearly 2,000 years - a worse sin than child rape or cold-blooded mass murder, strike you as being a just god Wally? Would you consider that to be justice?

wally1 wrote on Dec 31st, 2013 at 2:38pm:
For example the three in one God which people are brainwashed with.

Muslims see spirit as the soul and not as some figure or god like structure.


But only as your imagination has fooled you into believing Wally, through the child-like imaginations of a single, stand-alone, 7th century, SW Arabian desert dwelling illiterate.

Jews, Christians and Muslims all believe that God has a Spirit. We all also believe that He can impart His Spirit into men.

wally1 wrote on Dec 31st, 2013 at 2:38pm:
God created the physical part of the humans, but put in it the soul to bring it into life.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 5th, 2014 at 2:04am by Pete Waldo »  

Truth can never be told so as to be understood and not be believed. ~ William Blake
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pete Waldo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 503
U.S.
Gender: male
Re: Islam's ONLY UNFORGIVABLE Sin of "Shirk"
Reply #41 - Jan 24th, 2014 at 12:18am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 7:36am:
Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 2:34am:
Muhammad adopted, adapted and thinly veneered the Quraish pagan's moon, sun star and jinn-devil worship rituals so he could keep Kaaba Inc going.


...or could it be that the Quraish pagans had adapted the the monotheism of Abraham that had come before them?


You are trying to excuse away what you recognize as a conspicuous lie, with an absolutely preposterous notion. That the Quraish pagan's that built their Kaaba in the 5th century for veneration of 360 idols, including their black stone idol that Muhammad's followers continue to venerate to this day, do so in a town that did not exist prior to the 4th century AD.

As you have now been shown in the history of Mecca thread, and recognize, it is a historical and geographical impossibility, that Abraham, Hagar or Ishmael could have ever had anything to do with the town of Mecca, that was not even settled until the 4th century AD.
So no, your suggestion is not only ridiculous, but it remains a historical and geographical impossibility.
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1388067196/43#43

Islamic "tradition" is lie upon lie upon lie, layer upon layer upon layer. That can be easily recognized through Islam's own books.
http://www.brotherpete.com/origins_of_islam.htm

polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 1st, 2014 at 7:36am:
When religious leaders adopt systems and institutions that are familiar to the people that leader is attempting to convert, its not necessarily a sign of a fraud. Just like the christians adopted a whole host of Greek/Roman pagan rituals as a ploy to make the transformation of the people smoother. By the way, the concept of the "sacrifice for our sins" has roots in pre-christian pagan mythology.


You are denigrating your own religion.
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1388584924/0#5
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 24th, 2014 at 12:51am by Pete Waldo »  

Truth can never be told so as to be understood and not be believed. ~ William Blake
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Stratos
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4725
Re: Islam's ONLY UNFORGIVABLE Sin of "Shirk"
Reply #42 - Jan 24th, 2014 at 12:25am
 
Just curious, what does the Koran actually say about the origin of the black stone?
Back to top
 

Pete Waldo wrote on Jan 15th, 2014 at 11:24pm:
Thus killing those Canaanite babies while they were still innocent, was a particularly merciful act
 
IP Logged
 
Pete Waldo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 503
U.S.
Gender: male
Re: Islam's ONLY UNFORGIVABLE Sin of "Shirk"
Reply #43 - Jan 24th, 2014 at 12:30am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 31st, 2013 at 9:49am:
I'm not really sure where (if anywhere) in the islamic texts it says shirk is the greatest sin.


How could the ONLY UNFORGIVABLE sin not be the greatest sin?
In other words those that hold the doctrine of Christ and confess that Jesus is the Son of God, and pray in Jesus' name as Christians have for nearly 2,000 years, are guilty of the false prophet Muhammad's only unforgivable sin. Christians that are commanded to love our neighbor as ourselves.
While sins like child rape, prisoner rape and cold-blooded mass murder may be forgiven in Islam.
All of which as it happens, Muhammad was guilty.
http://www.falseprophetmuhammad.com/jesus_or_muhammad.htm

Does that describe a just God to you gandalf?


Thus Muhammad's followers are ANTICHRIST because of your faith in the false prophet Muhammad alone.
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1388067196/46#46

polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 31st, 2013 at 9:49am:
Its easy to see why it was emphasised so heavilly during Prophet Muhammad's time though - the people during that time did worship Allah, and recognised him as the supreme God. However they also set up subordinate partners to him, and set up all the idols for worship inside the Kabaa. So even these "polytheists" were basically on the "right" path according to islam, but for this innovation of setting up these idols - which was only a relatively new innovation on the original "true" religion of Abraham, which the people of Arabia never really fully abandoned. Thus Muhammad's mission was more about reminding the people of their heritage, and pointing out that Allah was not merely the best of many gods, but the only one true God - rather than introducing a completely new religion.

Interestingly, its said that when Muhammad took Mecca and destroyed the idols in the Kabaa, he left one in there - a statue of the virgin Mary.


The idol he did not destroy is the same idol that Muhammad's followers prostrate themselves toward five times a day, and travel to and march around 7 times as the Arabian pagans did before Muhammad was ever born. Kissing the Quraish pagan's black stone idol, or if too crowded, at least pointing to it on each trip around.

...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 24th, 2014 at 12:36am by Pete Waldo »  

Truth can never be told so as to be understood and not be believed. ~ William Blake
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print