Australian Politics Forum - FOR bugger SAKE

Grappler Racist Filth Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 90979 Proud Old White Australian Man Gender:	Re: FOR bugger SAKE Reply #135 - Dec 31^st, 2013 at 5:46pm On special New Year's Day only for public servants:-
Back to top	« Last Edit: Dec 31^st, 2013 at 5:57pm by Grappler Racist Filth » “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

Grappler Racist Filth Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 90979 Proud Old White Australian Man Gender:	Re: FOR bugger SAKE Reply #136 - Dec 31^st, 2013 at 5:48pm On special New Year's Day only for public servants:-
Back to top	« Last Edit: Dec 31^st, 2013 at 5:56pm by Grappler Racist Filth » “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

Grappler Racist Filth Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 90979 Proud Old White Australian Man Gender:	Re: FOR bugger SAKE Reply #137 - Dec 31^st, 2013 at 5:51pm * push harder through the Stargate....
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39972
Gender: male

Re: FOR bugger SAKE
Reply #138 - Dec 31^st, 2013 at 5:53pm

longweekend58 wrote on Dec 31^st, 2013 at 5:16pm:

Grendel wrote on Dec 31^st, 2013 at 12:01pm:

You probably just misquoted him or misunderstood him or lied... knowing you Skippy.

I do recall he spoke against such things.

skippy is a moron of the highest order who lacks the intelligence to understand what a paraphilia is as opposed to a criminal offence.

I have started a Thread here for Longweekend and others to debate the issue.

Click here.

Back to top

IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: FOR bugger SAKE
Reply #139 - Dec 31^st, 2013 at 6:36pm

longweekend58 wrote on Dec 31^st, 2013 at 11:23am:

That's why the majority of sex offending against children isn't committed by Paedos but rather normal average people in the community.

I do believe you are yet again attempting to normalise child sexual predatory behaviour. Normal people don't sex offend against children, that's why normal people are normal. the majority of sex offending against prepubescent children is committed by pedophiles who have committed multi offences and who definitely arent normal.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 156741 Gender:	Re: FOR bugger SAKE Reply #140 - Dec 31^st, 2013 at 6:37pm .
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

Andrei.Hicks

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male

Re: FOR bugger SAKE
Reply #141 - Dec 31^st, 2013 at 6:56pm

skippy. wrote on Dec 31^st, 2013 at 11:59am:

Longweekend ran off to the mods because I stood up to his assertions it's ok to be a peado, says a lot about him given he accuses me of running off to the mods all the time. I have at no time called him a peado read my posts, but he is now threatening me with legal action via PMs.

Anyone who calls another poster a pedophile will take an immediate ban from here, I hold a clear view on that.
It is derogatory and outright defamatory to boot.

I have been through this thread and that hasn't occurred.

It is a topic which brings about strong views and understandably so but calling out someone as being a defender of pedophiles and calling them a pedophile are completely different things.

Hate to use a UK reference but that's what I know best, Lord Longford was a guy who defended the rights of pedophiles and for their jail times to be reduced etc. I disliked the guy immensely as a result of what I thought were idiotic and outright dangerous views and while I would call hi a defender of pedophiles - at no point would I say he was one himself.

I think that's what we have here.

If skippy (or anyone else) calls LW (or any other poster) one he will be banned.
He hasn't done so.

On that note I wish everyone over there in Ausland a happy new year.

Back to top

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: FOR bugger SAKE
Reply #142 - Jan 1^st, 2014 at 9:05am

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Dec 31^st, 2013 at 6:56pm:

skippy. wrote on Dec 31^st, 2013 at 11:59am:

Longweekend ran off to the mods because I stood up to his assertions it's ok to be a peado, says a lot about him given he accuses me of running off to the mods all the time. I have at no time called him a peado read my posts, but he is now threatening me with legal action via PMs.

Anyone who calls another poster a pedophile will take an immediate ban from here, I hold a clear view on that.
It is derogatory and outright defamatory to boot.

I have been through this thread and that hasn't occurred.

It is a topic which brings about strong views and understandably so but calling out someone as being a defender of pedophiles and calling them a pedophile are completely different things.

Hate to use a UK reference but that's what I know best, Lord Longford was a guy who defended the rights of pedophiles and for their jail times to be reduced etc. I disliked the guy immensely as a result of what I thought were idiotic and outright dangerous views and while I would call hi a defender of pedophiles - at no point would I say he was one himself.

I think that's what we have here.

If skippy (or anyone else) calls LW (or any other poster) one he will be banned.
He hasn't done so.

On that note I wish everyone over there in Ausland a happy new year.

it is a distinction I find a tad arbitrary. if you are going to ban people for calling lastnail a loser - which is a rather obvious fact - then banning someone for calling another a supporter of pedophiles should attract the same penalty. just be consistent. At the moment nobody is really aware what your standards and expectations are since they are inconsistent and arbitrary.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: FOR bugger SAKE
Reply #143 - Jan 1^st, 2014 at 9:37am

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 1^st, 2014 at 9:05am:

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Dec 31^st, 2013 at 6:56pm:

skippy. wrote on Dec 31^st, 2013 at 11:59am:

Longweekend ran off to the mods because I stood up to his assertions it's ok to be a peado, says a lot about him given he accuses me of running off to the mods all the time. I have at no time called him a peado read my posts, but he is now threatening me with legal action via PMs.

Anyone who calls another poster a pedophile will take an immediate ban from here, I hold a clear view on that.
It is derogatory and outright defamatory to boot.

I have been through this thread and that hasn't occurred.

It is a topic which brings about strong views and understandably so but calling out someone as being a defender of pedophiles and calling them a pedophile are completely different things.

Hate to use a UK reference but that's what I know best, Lord Longford was a guy who defended the rights of pedophiles and for their jail times to be reduced etc. I disliked the guy immensely as a result of what I thought were idiotic and outright dangerous views and while I would call hi a defender of pedophiles - at no point would I say he was one himself.

I think that's what we have here.

If skippy (or anyone else) calls LW (or any other poster) one he will be banned.
He hasn't done so.

On that note I wish everyone over there in Ausland a happy new year.

it is a distinction I find a tad arbitrary. if you are going to ban people for calling lastnail a loser - which is a rather obvious fact - then banning someone for calling another a supporter of pedophiles should attract the same penalty. just be consistent. At the moment nobody is really aware what your standards and expectations are since they are inconsistent and arbitrary.

Tissue?

Back to top

image_186.jpg (11 KB | 46 )

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

Andrei.Hicks Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 23818 Carlsbad, CA Gender:	Re: FOR bugger SAKE Reply #144 - Jan 1^st, 2014 at 11:56am I don't think I could be more clear actually. You call someone a pedophile you go. That's not happened.
Back to top	Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde IP Logged

ian

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 9451

Re: FOR bugger SAKE
Reply #145 - Jan 1^st, 2014 at 11:59am

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 1^st, 2014 at 9:05am:

it is a distinction I find a tad arbitrary. if you are going to ban people for calling lastnail a loser - which is a rather obvious fact - then banning someone for calling another a supporter of pedophiles should attract the same penalty. just be consistent. At the moment nobody is really aware what your standards and expectations are since they are inconsistent and arbitrary.

right. so you think you should be able to post your pro pedophile propaganda uncontested.

Back to top

IP Logged

Grappler Racist Filth

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 90979
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male

Re: FOR bugger SAKE
Reply #146 - Jan 1^st, 2014 at 12:19pm

I believe Andrei is not arguing any right to dispute an issue or agenda - just the way in which it can be done - by sticking to the core facts and refraining from derogatory name-calling.

I wonder why 'loser' is a bad thing to call someone, though... I guess it's name calling..

Happy New Year and leave us do the issues to death - and not play the man.

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: FOR bugger SAKE
Reply #147 - Jan 1^st, 2014 at 1:59pm

ian wrote on Jan 1^st, 2014 at 11:59am:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 1^st, 2014 at 9:05am:

it is a distinction I find a tad arbitrary. if you are going to ban people for calling lastnail a loser - which is a rather obvious fact - then banning someone for calling another a supporter of pedophiles should attract the same penalty. just be consistent. At the moment nobody is really aware what your standards and expectations are since they are inconsistent and arbitrary.

right. so you think you should be able to post your pro pedophile propaganda uncontested.

so andrie... your opinion on the above??? Im interested just to see how this fits in with your supposed alleged moderation standards.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

skippy.

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 20882
Gender: male

Re: FOR bugger SAKE
Reply #148 - Jan 1^st, 2014 at 7:16pm

longweekend58 wrote on Dec 31^st, 2013 at 11:23am:

skippy. wrote on Dec 31^st, 2013 at 11:13am:

We should never EVER let apologists for the heinous crime of peadophilia normalise this scum.

except it isn't a crime. it is a condition, the outworkings of it however ARE criminal. That's why the majority of sex offending against children isn't committed by Paedos but rather normal average people in the community.

Normal average people don't have sex with children.

Back to top

freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39972
Gender: male

Re: FOR bugger SAKE
Reply #149 - Jan 1^st, 2014 at 7:23pm

skippy. wrote on Jan 1^st, 2014 at 7:16pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Dec 31^st, 2013 at 11:23am:

skippy. wrote on Dec 31^st, 2013 at 11:13am:

We should never EVER let apologists for the heinous crime of peadophilia normalise this scum.

except it isn't a crime. it is a condition, the outworkings of it however ARE criminal. That's why the majority of sex offending against children isn't committed by Paedos but rather normal average people in the community.

Normal average people don't have sex with children.

Freediver? Here is your window of opportunity. Mohammad (sic)?

Back to top

IP Logged