|
sir prince duke alevine
|
ian wrote on Dec 27 th, 2013 at 12:48pm: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 27 th, 2013 at 11:39am: ian wrote on Dec 27 th, 2013 at 11:28am: sir prince duke alevine wrote on Dec 27 th, 2013 at 11:23am: When people refer to KL they don't just refer to the city area but the entire urban area, which is 6m.
It's like saying Melbourne is only 100,000 people. See?
And again, all issues point to the actual government. Our great fwiends. But the people themselves, no questions about it: harmonious and incredibly friendly. And the different groups in society, despite the actual government live well with each other. Incorrect, you are thinking of the Klang valley not KL, the Klang valley includes adjoining cities and towns also, its like saying Newcastle is part of Sydney. Just like Melbourne has adjoining cities. But guess what, we still refer to the entire area as Melbourne, even though it isn't. It's like LA. Same thing. LA has 16million, but in actual fact LA is around 3 mil. You aren't getting it, KL, the city has an area of 243 sq km with a population of 1.6 m. If we include the Klang valley in the city area as you suggest then we come up with an area of around 25,000 sq km with a population of 6 m. Despite which, its not an argument, a simple google would have shown you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klang_ValleyOh thanks. Quote:An alternative reference to this would be Kuala Lumpur Metropolitan Area or Greater Kuala Lumpur I think you're missing the point. Most cities, like Paris, Los Angelos, Madrid, Sydney, Melbourne, etc. etc. etc. have a population within the actual city, but when people talk about the city they refer to its Metropolitan area.  The only exception I can think of is in India. But then I'm not gonig to claim I know it all, it's just wihtin the places I've been I can tell you about.
|