progressiveslol wrote on Apr 17^th, 2013 at 8:47am:

Could you post where I have argued that "Antartica is also losing ice mass"?
If anything - I would have said the exact opposite, since warming Antarctica would result in more ice, not less, due to increased precipitation.

Though the amount of summer ice melt in Antarctica is certainly increasing

According to AAP, scientists found the evidence for the fast melting in a 364-meter ice core containing a record of freezing and melting over the previous millennium.
"We found that the coolest conditions on the Antarctic Peninsula and the lowest amount of summer melt occurred around 600 years ago,” said Australian lead researcher Dr. Nerilie Abram, from the Australian National University and British Antarctic Survey. "At that time temperatures were around 1.6C lower than those recorded in the late 20th century and the amount of annual snowfall that melted and refroze was about 0.5%. Today, we see almost 10 times as much (5%) of the annual snowfall melting each year.”

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/14413217-fastest-antarctic-summer-ice-...

Why do you tell lies like this?

Are you pathalogically dishonest - or just really, really stupid?

Please explain Liar.

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 20^th, 2013 at 12:09pm:


That's based on data - Data that Anthony Watts and Richard Muller checked. Berkely went overboard in engaging self-styled sceptics.

What evidence do you have that there was global warming in the last 250 years caused by Solar Forcing?

By the way,  nobody is talking about short term "decade scale" cyclic changes in Solar Forcing due to Solar cycles. Just so that you understand, the implied meaning is a progressive warming trend due to solar forcing over the last 250 years. There is none. 

Now there are two main research facilities working on Solar Irradiance. There are PMOD at Davos and The Max Planck Institute.

The increased forcings observed over the last 60 years are not reflected in increased solar forcings. There are decadal scale fluctuations due to the 11 year solar cycle and little else.  Data from PMOD.



Historical measurement of Solar irradiance depends on proxies, but the work carried out by the Max Planck institute shows no remarkable increase in Solar Irradiance in the last 250 years.

The graph is a scan from an old paper by Solanki and Fligge.
(GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 26, NO. 16, PAGES 2465-2468) 

I'm not aware of any more recent research that contradicts these findings. Are you?

progressiveslol wrote on Apr 20^th, 2013 at 12:28pm:


So - no.

You can't post where I have argued  that "Antartica is also losing ice mass"



Caught again.

Why do you keep doing it?

You get caught ever single time

You are the worst liar I have ever seen.

Seriously - you are far too stupid to be doing this.  You get caught.

EVERY SINGLE TIME.

Grow up Liar.

Chimp_Logic wrote on Apr 20^th, 2013 at 11:01pm:

Yes.  Progs is a champion liar.

He gets caught time and time again - then he runs away like a little girl.

He is a big fan of English tabloid journalists.  He fell hook,line and sinker for the thing in the e Daily Mail that said that global warming has stopped!

When he is asked how global warming could have possibly stopped when sea levels continue to rise, when the arctic ice cap continues to melt and when glacial mass balance continues to decrease - he runs away like a little girl.

And this is another classic example of his lying.  As you have realised.  He is not very bright.  So he thinks he can make things up and no one will notice.

Seriously - I think someone should contact the Australian Federal Police about him.  He is obviously deranged.  Surely the AFP are monitoring these boards?!?!  Here he is boys...come and get him.

Chimp_Logic wrote on Apr 20^th, 2013 at 11:44pm:

No.  He won't.

He has been caught lying so many times.

But he just runs away.

We can ask him here:

Hey Progs - show us where I have argued  that "Antartica is also losing ice mass?

But he will not answer.

He is a liar.

He know he is a liar.

And he runs away.


Or we could ask him - Hey Progs - why did you deliberately lie when you started this thread:
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1363723853

But he will just run away.

He is a liar.

A liar caught over and over and over again red-handed telling lies.

Emma wrote on Apr 21^st, 2013 at 2:20am:

Hey, art loving buddy chill out: this is serious business and that means chess.
Polluters have a lot to lose... Year eleven economics taught the relevant Aussie punter that opportunity cost means a liberal voters son will always be a slave.
Chess teaches you that even your own flesh must be used if you perceive the threat to your dreams of dynasty by way of polluting for free, um, threatened. Crack smokers rule this western world: that's why it apparently feels safe behind the wall of impotence that is nuclear softiness!!!!! 

rabbitoh07 wrote on Apr 20^th, 2013 at 12:15pm:


That's a bit unfair. I don't think he's pathologically dishonest.

Chimp_Logic wrote on Apr 21^st, 2013 at 5:50pm:

Liberal voters hate their kids!

End of story really!!