|
52midnight
|
> All I can say is that an ex cop
I assume you mean speaking AS "an ex cop" and surmise from this that you have FIRST-HAND PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE of issues that others debate from their arm-chairs. Please forgive me for what may appear as a tutorial attitude; I'm merely trying to respond to your practical experience with philosophical criteria that may only be partially relevant.
The first point I'd make is that Australia has fulfilled its traditional role as America's favourite catamite and sent troops to murder innocent people - women and children included - in the Middle East; and all in pursuit of America's political and commercial interests. What goes around, comes around (otherwise known as the Law of Krma), so its no surprize to find Afghan and other refugees turning up on our shores seeking sanctuary from our criminal international escapades, albeit sanctioned by the criminals in America.
IMHO, this is best viewed in the context of the Abrahamic religions - Judaism, Christianity, and Islam - which together are the single greatest source of evil on this planet. One can address the problems within the Abrahamic religions with a view to resolving them, or one can step outside them entirely. The latter is my personal stance; I address the former simply by way of comment.
> We are importing what will turn out to be a monstrous problem for Australia
The first point that must be understood is that this is the whole purpose of the exercize, and I'll explain this. Politicians do not run countries in the modern West. They are bought by vested interests (the TransNational Corporations, international banks, and armaments manufacturers) to present politically acceptable interpretations of TNC-friendly policies.
The primary purpose of EVERY politician in Canberra and the State Capitals is to provide an ongoing media circus for public consumption, in order to distract attention from the real issues and the legal entitlements to resource exploitation being passed behind the media noise. THEY ARE DOING THIS SUPERBLY WELL.
The social problems caused by importing mediaeval fanatics into a (supposedly) modern society is - obviously and evidentially - to destabilize it, and keep its (stupid) citizens busy debating the ensuing issues.
> The hard line Muslim Sharia laws is barbaric and is swept under the carpet
As Wilders has pointed out, these are mediaeval doctrines suited only to primitive, ignorant fanatics. Muslims insist on their women being covered because their "men"folk are unable to restrain their animal urges at the sight of female flesh. This is obvious and incontrovertible, yet never mentioned in the MainStream Media.
> They are a HUGE PROBLEM and the Cops in Bankstown have the hardest job in the Force.
Yep; but the cops are Ozns, and too politically correct and morally spineless to take the required action.
> We ignore this festering problem at our peril.
Who is "We"? The international bankers are delighted at the social antagonism, since it prevents the sort of social cohesion that could militate constructively against them. The pollies are delighted because it gives them "issues" to "debate". The media is more than delighted at having so many "news stories" to report. WHO is the "We" that is is peril?
|
Forum
Pages: 
