Australian Politics Forum

FRED.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3698

Re: Homosexuality
Reply #15 - Feb 8^th, 2013 at 8:27am

Innocent bystander wrote on Feb 7^th, 2013 at 4:48pm:

Homos haven't just achieved equality they've gone one step further and invaded straight world, the only reason they want to get marriage laws changed is so they can say in your face hetros we rock your world.

Michael and Gary got married in California .
>
>
>
> They couldn't afford a honeymoon so they go back to Micheal's Mom and
> Dad's house in Corner Brook for their first married night together.
>
> In the morning, Johnny, Micheal's little brother, gets up and has his
> breakfast.
> As he is going out of the door to go to school, he asks his mom if Michael
> and Gary are up yet.
> She replies, 'No'.
> Johnny asks, 'Do you know what I think?'
> His mom replies, 'I don't want to hear what you think! Just go to
> school.'
>
> Johnny comes home for lunch and asks his mom, 'Are Michael and Gary up
> yet?'
> She replies, 'No.'
> Johnny says, 'Do you know what I think?'
> His mom replies, 'Never mind what you think! Eat your lunch and go back to
> school '
>
> After school, Johnny comes home and asks again,
> 'Are Michael and Gary up yet?'
> His mom says, 'No.'
> He asks, 'Do you know what I think?'
> His mom replies, 'OK, now tell me what you think.'
>
>
> He says: 'Last night Michael came to my room for Vaseline and I think....I
> gave him my airplane glue.'
>

Back to top

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: Homosexuality
Reply #16 - Feb 8^th, 2013 at 9:43am

olde.sault wrote on Feb 8^th, 2013 at 7:32am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2013 at 3:22pm:

olde.sault wrote on Feb 7^th, 2013 at 12:13pm:

How come our researchers haven't solved this problem but plan to land on Mars?

That it isn't nature's way is inarguable, a genetic fault.

Could it be the incompatibility of the parents?

Whatever, it is not anything to be proud about - no one is perfect.

People have nose jobs, cap their teeth, hide skin problems, wear wigs, etc.

Whatever, who parades their imperfections on Oxford Street but the homosexuals?

Despite their problems or maybe because of these imperfections, many achieve greatness, like Tchaikovsky, Oscar Wilde. . .

Why not celebrate this instead of baring one's flanks in a parade?

Actually saulty..it MUST be nature's way, and can't be a genetic fault....
Given that homosexuals don't reproduce, if homosexuality was simply a 'genetic fault', it would have died out through natural selection millennia ago..

Nothing to do with the genes, you say?

Perhaps it is the fault of the sex act itself - er. . not from the right side or perhaps too bumpy!

Or perhaps it's Nature's response to high population levels???

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

gizmo_2655

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male

Re: Homosexuality
Reply #17 - Feb 8^th, 2013 at 9:46am

olde.sault wrote on Feb 8^th, 2013 at 7:21am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2013 at 3:22pm:

olde.sault wrote on Feb 7^th, 2013 at 12:13pm:

How come our researchers haven't solved this problem but plan to land on Mars?

That it isn't nature's way is inarguable, a genetic fault.

Could it be the incompatibility of the parents?

Whatever, it is not anything to be proud about - no one is perfect.

People have nose jobs, cap their teeth, hide skin problems, wear wigs, etc.

Whatever, who parades their imperfections on Oxford Street but the homosexuals?

Despite their problems or maybe because of these imperfections, many achieve greatness, like Tchaikovsky, Oscar Wilde. . .

Why not celebrate this instead of baring one's flanks in a parade?

Actually saulty..it MUST be nature's way, and can't be a genetic fault....
Given that homosexuals don't reproduce, if homosexuality was simply a 'genetic fault', it would have died out through natural selection millennia ago..

You have forgotten that homos. can reproduce and many do leaving wives and offspring broken.

Let's stick to facts . . .at least!

Ok, it's only been fairly recently that the laws and morals (both of which are concepts invented by governments and/or churches) have made it necessary for homosexuals to enter into heterosexual marriages as a 'cover', to avoid arrest and persecution.

Back to top

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat

IP Logged

Vic

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 8534
Melbourne Victoria
Gender: male

Re: Homosexuality
Reply #18 - Feb 8^th, 2013 at 9:57am

olde.sault wrote on Feb 7^th, 2013 at 12:13pm:

How come our researchers haven't solved this problem but plan to land on Mars?

That it isn't nature's way is inarguable, a genetic fault.

Could it be the incompatibility of the parents?

Whatever, it is not anything to be proud about - no one is perfect.

People have nose jobs, cap their teeth, hide skin problems, wear wigs, etc.

Whatever, who parades their imperfections on Oxford Street but the homosexuals?

Despite their problems or maybe because of these imperfections, many achieve greatness, like Tchaikovsky, Oscar Wilde. . .

Why not celebrate this instead of baring one's flanks in a parade?

Was it you telling us in another thread that your hubby ran off with another man? If so, did he bear his flanks in a parade? Shocked

Back to top

Football, Meat Pies, Kangaroos and Liberal Lies
Football, Meat Pies, Kangaroos and Liberal Lies

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Homosexuality
Reply #19 - Feb 8^th, 2013 at 10:07am

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 8^th, 2013 at 9:43am:

olde.sault wrote on Feb 8^th, 2013 at 7:32am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2013 at 3:22pm:

olde.sault wrote on Feb 7^th, 2013 at 12:13pm:

How come our researchers haven't solved this problem but plan to land on Mars?

That it isn't nature's way is inarguable, a genetic fault.

Could it be the incompatibility of the parents?

Whatever, it is not anything to be proud about - no one is perfect.

People have nose jobs, cap their teeth, hide skin problems, wear wigs, etc.

Whatever, who parades their imperfections on Oxford Street but the homosexuals?

Despite their problems or maybe because of these imperfections, many achieve greatness, like Tchaikovsky, Oscar Wilde. . .

Why not celebrate this instead of baring one's flanks in a parade?

Actually saulty..it MUST be nature's way, and can't be a genetic fault....
Given that homosexuals don't reproduce, if homosexuality was simply a 'genetic fault', it would have died out through natural selection millennia ago..

Nothing to do with the genes, you say?

Perhaps it is the fault of the sex act itself - er. . not from the right side or perhaps too bumpy!

Or perhaps it's Nature's response to high population levels???

No, IF population levels are critically high now, they certainly haven't always been that way. I belive their numbers have remained fairly constant throughout human history - which would suggest it correlates closely with other traits, rather than existing in isolation.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

Doctor Jolly

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3808

Re: Homosexuality
Reply #20 - Feb 8^th, 2013 at 11:07am

The answer is simple.

Seperate Sex into two categories.
1) for Recreation.
2) for having children.

The vast, vast, 99.9999% of sex is for reason 1, so it doesnt matter who you do it with, male or female.

Category 2 is open to both hetro and homo people. A homo person can "force himself" to have sex with a woman (surrogate) if he wants a family.

Back to top

IP Logged

olde.sault

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2913

Re: Homosexuality
Reply #21 - Feb 8^th, 2013 at 1:27pm

Vic wrote on Feb 8^th, 2013 at 9:57am:

olde.sault wrote on Feb 7^th, 2013 at 12:13pm:

How come our researchers haven't solved this problem but plan to land on Mars?

That it isn't nature's way is inarguable, a genetic fault.

Could it be the incompatibility of the parents?

Whatever, it is not anything to be proud about - no one is perfect.

People have nose jobs, cap their teeth, hide skin problems, wear wigs, etc.

Whatever, who parades their imperfections on Oxford Street but the homosexuals?

Despite their problems or maybe because of these imperfections, many achieve greatness, like Tchaikovsky, Oscar Wilde. . .

Why not celebrate this instead of baring one's flanks in a parade?

Was it you telling us in another thread that your hubby ran off with another man? If so, did he bear his flanks in a parade? Shocked

No, he was an ardent womaniser but fiddled occasinally with a handy little girl - fortunately, not as far as penetration.

This hadn't come to my attention until I had kicked him out of the house otherwise, he may have ended his sick life in jail.

I think such behaviour also comes of a faulty gene or maybe just a permanent itch that can't be placated with a scratch!

Back to top

IP Logged

olde.sault

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2913

Re: Homosexuality
Reply #22 - Feb 9^th, 2013 at 7:09am

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 8^th, 2013 at 9:46am:

olde.sault wrote on Feb 8^th, 2013 at 7:21am:

gizmo_2655 wrote on Feb 7^th, 2013 at 3:22pm:

olde.sault wrote on Feb 7^th, 2013 at 12:13pm:

How come our researchers haven't solved this problem but plan to land on Mars?

That it isn't nature's way is inarguable, a genetic fault.

Could it be the incompatibility of the parents?

Whatever, it is not anything to be proud about - no one is perfect.

People have nose jobs, cap their teeth, hide skin problems, wear wigs, etc.

Whatever, who parades their imperfections on Oxford Street but the homosexuals?

Despite their problems or maybe because of these imperfections, many achieve greatness, like Tchaikovsky, Oscar Wilde. . .

Why not celebrate this instead of baring one's flanks in a parade?

Actually saulty..it MUST be nature's way, and can't be a genetic fault....
Given that homosexuals don't reproduce, if homosexuality was simply a 'genetic fault', it would have died out through natural selection millennia ago..

You have forgotten that homos. can reproduce and many do leaving wives and offspring broken.

Let's stick to facts . . .at least!

Ok, it's only been fairly recently that the laws and morals (both of which are concepts invented by governments and/or churches) have made it necessary for homosexuals to enter into heterosexual marriages as a 'cover', to avoid arrest and persecution.

From what I have read, gays often fall in love with straight women but just can't act it out.

I saw a film about Oscar Wilde being in love with an actress but could only express his feelings with flowers!

All seems to be possible in this world

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 37262 Gender:	Re: Homosexuality Reply #23 - Feb 9^th, 2013 at 7:12am you have to blame hetero's. theyre the ones who keep having these gay babies.
Back to top	IP Logged

aquascoot Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 37262 Gender:	Re: Homosexuality Reply #24 - Feb 9^th, 2013 at 7:13am the judge agrees
Back to top	30291709.jpg (106 KB \| 58 ) IP Logged

The_Barnacle Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6205 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Homosexuality Reply #25 - Feb 9^th, 2013 at 12:11pm Its always curious to me that when the subject of "Homosexuality" is brought up, 99% of the time it is only gay men who are discussed. So why is there so much more moral outrage over gay men than there is over gay women?
Back to top	The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said. IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 149654
Gender: male

Re: Homosexuality
Reply #26 - Feb 9^th, 2013 at 12:39pm

The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 9^th, 2013 at 12:11pm:

Its always curious to me that when the subject of "Homosexuality" is brought up, 99% of the time it is only gay men who are discussed.

So why is there so much more moral outrage over gay men than there is over gay women?

Excellent point.

I, for one, have nothing against two young Asian women getting down and dirty with some very sensual and wet kissing. More of it I say!

However, If I saw two men doing that ...

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

The_Barnacle

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Homosexuality
Reply #27 - Feb 10^th, 2013 at 9:49am

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 9^th, 2013 at 12:39pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 9^th, 2013 at 12:11pm:

Its always curious to me that when the subject of "Homosexuality" is brought up, 99% of the time it is only gay men who are discussed.

So why is there so much more moral outrage over gay men than there is over gay women?

Excellent point.

I, for one, have nothing against two young Asian women getting down and dirty with some very sensual and wet kissing. More of it I say!

However, If I saw two men doing that ...

And that seems to be the common reaction. The difference is that "conservatives" tend to want to impose their own feelings of "disgust" on other people. They want to interfere with what consenting adults do in private purely because the thought of it makes them feel disgust.

It was discussed on the recent Richard Dawkins program and this New Scientist article on the "power of disgust" is quite educational -

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21528731.800-the-yuck-factor-the-surprising-power-of-disgust.html

Quote:

Perhaps it's no surprise, then, to find that the more "disgustable" you are, the more likely you are to be politically conservative, says Pizarro, who has studied this correlation. Similarly, the more conservative that people are, the harsher their moral judgements become in the presence of disgust stimuli.

Humanity already has a track record of using disgust as a weapon against "outsiders" - lower castes, immigrants and homosexuals. Nazi propaganda notoriously depicted Jewish people as filthy rats.

Back to top

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Homosexuality
Reply #28 - Feb 10^th, 2013 at 10:43am

The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 9^th, 2013 at 12:11pm:

Its always curious to me that when the subject of "Homosexuality" is brought up, 99% of the time it is only gay men who are discussed.

So why is there so much more moral outrage over gay men than there is over gay women?

because gay women would only do to each other what men would do anyway, a bit of cunnilingus, a bit of finger work .....all things most men would do with a woman ..... gay men on the other hand, who the hell wants something shoved up their ar$e? it's not normal .

having said that, I don't care what they do to each other as long as they leave me out of it

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Postmodern Trendoid III

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 10300
Gender: male

Re: Homosexuality
Reply #29 - Feb 10^th, 2013 at 11:34am

The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 10^th, 2013 at 9:49am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 9^th, 2013 at 12:39pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 9^th, 2013 at 12:11pm:

Its always curious to me that when the subject of "Homosexuality" is brought up, 99% of the time it is only gay men who are discussed.

So why is there so much more moral outrage over gay men than there is over gay women?

Excellent point.

I, for one, have nothing against two young Asian women getting down and dirty with some very sensual and wet kissing. More of it I say!

However, If I saw two men doing that ...

And that seems to be the common reaction. The difference is that "conservatives" tend to want to impose their own feelings of "disgust" on other people.

And what is the difference when leftists impose their disgust on other people's views? Leftist constantly say we should be "disgusted" with capitalism, "disgusted" with people's views of boat people, "disgusted" with bogans etc.

The only difference between the political sides is what to be disgusted with. This is the same issue of the concept of fear. Leftists believe only conservatives fear things, but leftists have a truck load of things we ought to fear as well.

I'll say this again: No one stands outside their own prejudices, desires, drives, instincts or emotions. Everyone is embodied by them and makes judgement calls accordingly. Leftists need to get through their heads that they are not the new priesthood who have a telephone line to immutable moral laws.

Back to top

IP Logged