Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print
illegal Jewish immigration into Israel (Read 21370 times)
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: illegal Jewish immigration into Israel
Reply #15 - Nov 26th, 2012 at 3:55pm
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 3:31pm:
[quote author=04020D07020F05630 link=1353809434/13#13 date=1353907667]

But they were offered self-rule, with several countries created (Jordan, Lebanon and Syria for example) but the Arab State in Palestine rejected out of hand by the Arab League...


I'm not sure what offer you are referring to, but if it was made, it was in direct conflict with the Balfour declaration. But this was typical of the British rule - making conflicting commitments to both sides, and double crossing each at every step. Ultimately, the British were only interested in maintaining their sphere of influence and offsetting the ambitions of the other imperial European powers. In most cases this went against Palestinian nationalist aspirations. Britain offered "autonomy" in some instances - but only to leaders that had been bought out to British interests, who they could be sure would be reliable puppets.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: illegal Jewish immigration into Israel
Reply #16 - Nov 26th, 2012 at 4:22pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 3:55pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 3:31pm:
[quote author=04020D07020F05630 link=1353809434/13#13 date=1353907667]

But they were offered self-rule, with several countries created (Jordan, Lebanon and Syria for example) but the Arab State in Palestine rejected out of hand by the Arab League...


I'm not sure what offer you are referring to, but if it was made, it was in direct conflict with the Balfour declaration. But this was typical of the British rule - making conflicting commitments to both sides, and double crossing each at every step. Ultimately, the British were only interested in maintaining their sphere of influence and offsetting the ambitions of the other imperial European powers. In most cases this went against Palestinian nationalist aspirations. Britain offered "autonomy" in some instances - but only to leaders that had been bought out to British interests, who they could be sure would be reliable puppets.


Rubbish, the Balfour Declaration called for the creation of a Jewish Homeland (Israel) AND an Arab State (with a neutral League of nations/UN enclave around Jerusalem) within the British Mandate of Palestine...quite apart from the creation of Transjordan (now called Jordan, which was made up out of around 70% of the Mandate territory)..

However, the Arab League refused to participate in the idea of sharing the remaining 23% of Palestine (after the creation of Jordan) with a Jewish State, so the second Arab state was never assigned before Israel declared independence and the first Israeli/Arab war kicked off in 1948....

The Arab League bears at least 50% (possibly more) blame for the current state of affairs in and around Israel/Gaza/The West Bank and Golan Heights..
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: illegal Jewish immigration into Israel
Reply #17 - Nov 26th, 2012 at 5:44pm
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 4:22pm:
Rubbish, the Balfour Declaration called for the creation of a Jewish Homeland (Israel) AND an Arab State


no it didn't:

Quote:
His Majesty's government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration

Is that what you refer to as the "offer" the British gave for Palestinian statehood?

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 4:22pm:
However, the Arab League refused to participate in the idea of sharing the remaining 23% of Palestine (after the creation of Jordan) with a Jewish State, so the second Arab state was never assigned before Israel declared independence and the first Israeli/Arab war kicked off in 1948...


I assume you are talking about the UN partition plan, but this is something quite different to what we were talking about, and it certainly wasn't offered by the British.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 50277
At my desk.
Re: illegal Jewish immigration into Israel
Reply #18 - Nov 26th, 2012 at 5:47pm
 
Quote:
Bit rich? What do you call these sort of statements then?
Unlike Muslims, we do not insist on mass slaughters every time there is a change in leadership


Do you know what Abu proposes as the proper Islamic way to change government? I'll give you a hint - it is not democracy.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19444
Gender: male
Re: illegal Jewish immigration into Israel
Reply #19 - Nov 26th, 2012 at 5:49pm
 
abu_rashid wrote on Nov 25th, 2012 at 2:39pm:
freediver wrote on Nov 25th, 2012 at 12:10pm:
Abu has frequently claimed that Jews migrated illegally into Israel and over-ran it.


So how do you suppose Palestine went from a country of 98% Arabs ruled by an Islamic Shari'ah government at the turn of the 20th. century, to a country with 1/3 of Jews and ruled by a Jewish government by 1948?


Kemal Ataturk was the last man with the head job in Islam, he held the highest position in Islam and he dismantled the muslim Ottoman empire telling the men to shave their beards and Turkey gave up on Islamic rule as it was holding them back Ataturk embraced that unIslamic concept called democracy.
The last man who had the top job in Islam abandoned Islamic rule for democracy yet muslims today ignore his message.

When Ataturk dismantled the muslim Ottoman empire sharia law went the way of that fad in the 1980"s called colonic irrigation.

Tel Aviv was founded as a Hebrew speaking city in 1909 so its fair to say there were a considerable amount of Palestinian Yahud at that time.

You are very quiet about the Jews that were kicked out of their Arab homelands Abu, are we to believe you think it is ok for an Arab muslim to evict a Jew from their homeland yet it is not ok for a filthy yahud to evict a muslim from their home?

The Jews that were booted out of their homelands by muslim Arabs had to go somewhere that could explain why these jewish refugees from muslim lands ended up in Israel.

If the Arabs didnt boot the jews from their homelands there might not be as many jews in Israel today did you ever consider that fact?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_exodus_from_Arab_and_Muslim_countries


Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: illegal Jewish immigration into Israel
Reply #20 - Nov 26th, 2012 at 5:50pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 5:44pm:
gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 4:22pm:
Rubbish, the Balfour Declaration called for the creation of a Jewish Homeland (Israel) AND an Arab State


no it didn't:

Quote:
His Majesty's government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration

Is that what you refer to as the "offer" the British gave for Palestinian statehood?

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 4:22pm:
However, the Arab League refused to participate in the idea of sharing the remaining 23% of Palestine (after the creation of Jordan) with a Jewish State, so the second Arab state was never assigned before Israel declared independence and the first Israeli/Arab war kicked off in 1948...


I assume you are talking about the UN partition plan, but this is something quite different to what we were talking about, and it certainly wasn't offered by the British.


Ok, I'll give you that one....
The Balfour Dec took place within the UN/League of Nations partition plan then....pretty much the same thing, and doesn't change the fact that the Mandate system was just as legitimate as the previous Ottoman rule..
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: illegal Jewish immigration into Israel
Reply #21 - Nov 26th, 2012 at 5:56pm
 
freediver wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 5:47pm:
Do you know what Abu proposes as the proper Islamic way to change government? I'll give you a hint - it is not democracy.


And I'll give you a hint FD - I don't give a flying fluck what Abu says in this respect, and I'm certainly not interested in engaging in one line point scoring. You see unlike you I'm actually interested in constructively discussing this issue. I've given you a reasoned and (what surely constitutes) a well thought out analysis, and frankly I'm tired of you responding to me with childish one liners - mostly related to your pathetic pissing contest with Abu.

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 5:50pm:
The Balfour Dec took place within the UN/League of Nations partition plan then....pretty much the same thing


What? The Balfour declaration was in 1917, the UN partition plan was in 1947. They are worlds apart. The BD took place before the massive jewish immigration into Palestine, while the UN plan recognised the massive change in the demographic and political realities - both in terms of the huge shift in jewish influence, as well as an acknowledgement that Palestinian nationalism could no longer be ignored (like it could at the time of the BD). BD was a casual British thought bubble about what might happen many decades in the future. The UN plan was an urgent attempt to deal with the reality on the ground.

The two plans couldn't be more different.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 26th, 2012 at 6:05pm by polite_gandalf »  

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: illegal Jewish immigration into Israel
Reply #22 - Nov 26th, 2012 at 6:42pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 5:56pm:
freediver wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 5:47pm:
Do you know what Abu proposes as the proper Islamic way to change government? I'll give you a hint - it is not democracy.


And I'll give you a hint FD - I don't give a flying fluck what Abu says in this respect, and I'm certainly not interested in engaging in one line point scoring. You see unlike you I'm actually interested in constructively discussing this issue. I've given you a reasoned and (what surely constitutes) a well thought out analysis, and frankly I'm tired of you responding to me with childish one liners - mostly related to your pathetic pissing contest with Abu.

gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 5:50pm:
The Balfour Dec took place within the UN/League of Nations partition plan then....pretty much the same thing


What? The Balfour declaration was in 1917, the UN partition plan was in 1947. They are worlds apart. The BD took place before the massive jewish immigration into Palestine, while the UN plan recognised the massive change in the demographic and political realities - both in terms of the huge shift in jewish influence, as well as an acknowledgement that Palestinian nationalism could no longer be ignored (like it could at the time of the BD). BD was a casual British thought bubble about what might happen many decades in the future. The UN plan was an urgent attempt to deal with the reality on the ground.

The two plans couldn't be more different.



I'm sorry, I disagree....the League of Nations/UN Mandate system was always all about creating independant nations out of territories that had been administered by the losers in WW1, mainly Germany and the Ottoman Empire.
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 50277
At my desk.
Re: illegal Jewish immigration into Israel
Reply #23 - Nov 26th, 2012 at 6:49pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 5:49pm:
abu_rashid wrote on Nov 25th, 2012 at 2:39pm:
freediver wrote on Nov 25th, 2012 at 12:10pm:
Abu has frequently claimed that Jews migrated illegally into Israel and over-ran it.


So how do you suppose Palestine went from a country of 98% Arabs ruled by an Islamic Shari'ah government at the turn of the 20th. century, to a country with 1/3 of Jews and ruled by a Jewish government by 1948?


Kemal Ataturk was the last man with the head job in Islam, he held the highest position in Islam and he dismantled the muslim Ottoman empire telling the men to shave their beards and Turkey gave up on Islamic rule as it was holding them back Ataturk embraced that unIslamic concept called democracy.
The last man who had the top job in Islam abandoned Islamic rule for democracy yet muslims today ignore his message.

When Ataturk dismantled the muslim Ottoman empire sharia law went the way of that fad in the 1980"s called colonic irrigation.

Tel Aviv was founded as a Hebrew speaking city in 1909 so its fair to say there were a considerable amount of Palestinian Yahud at that time.

You are very quiet about the Jews that were kicked out of their Arab homelands Abu, are we to believe you think it is ok for an Arab muslim to evict a Jew from their homeland yet it is not ok for a filthy yahud to evict a muslim from their home?

The Jews that were booted out of their homelands by muslim Arabs had to go somewhere that could explain why these jewish refugees from muslim lands ended up in Israel.

If the Arabs didnt boot the jews from their homelands there might not be as many jews in Israel today did you ever consider that fact?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_exodus_from_Arab_and_Muslim_countries




Ironically, according to the link Abu gave as evidence to back up his own argument, the biggest contributor to Jewish immigration into Israel was their forced eviction from Arab Muslim countries. I wonder what he intends with these Jews when he insists they be sent back home?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 26th, 2012 at 6:55pm by freediver »  

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: illegal Jewish immigration into Israel
Reply #24 - Nov 26th, 2012 at 6:51pm
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 6:42pm:
I'm sorry, I disagree....the League of Nations/UN Mandate system was always all about creating independant nations out of territories that had been administered by the losers in WW1, mainly Germany and the Ottoman Empire.


So? That has nothing to do with whether or not the Balfour Declaration and the UN partition plan were "pretty much the same thing" - they weren't. Like I say, they were world's apart, each responding to completely different geographical and political realities. Besides, the UN plan proposed a Palestinian state, the BD did not. In fact the zionists always interpreted the Balfour promise as a free license to claim the entire area west of the Jordan (and even beyond) and sweep away the native arabs.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 50277
At my desk.
Re: illegal Jewish immigration into Israel
Reply #25 - Nov 26th, 2012 at 6:56pm
 
Quote:
And I'll give you a hint FD - I don't give a flying fluck what Abu says in this respect, and I'm certainly not interested in engaging in one line point scoring. You see unlike you I'm actually interested in constructively discussing this issue. I've given you a reasoned and (what surely constitutes) a well thought out analysis, and frankly I'm tired of you responding to me with childish one liners - mostly related to your pathetic pissing contest with Abu.


It is not a one line point scoring thing. It is an accusation that Abu levels against Iraeli Jews over and over again in spite of the obvious facts and our many attempts to correct him. Why do you so begrudge my efforts to correct his anti semitic propaganda? It is an entire thread devoted to the subject, not one line. If you don't think it is important, you don't have to respond. It's not like we are short on threads about the Israel/Palestine conflict - they don't all have to be about you.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
abu_rashid
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Aussie Muslim

Posts: 8353
Re: illegal Jewish immigration into Israel
Reply #26 - Nov 26th, 2012 at 7:30pm
 
Just on the topic of partition plans, there were several, not just the final U.N one which was supposedly enacted (even though it never was anyway).

The reason the Zionists never mention the earlier partition plans, like the Peel Plan, is because they rejected every single one of them, because none of them gave the Jews at least 50% of the country, instead they proposed a small Jewish "homeland" inside a larger Palestinian state, which reflected the respective populations proportionally.

What was carried out was not a partition plan, U.N or otherwise, it was Plan Dalet, the systematic expulsion of Arabs from their villages and towns through force by Jewish terrorist militias.

So the whole argument about a partition plan is moot anyway.
Back to top
 
abu_rashid  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: illegal Jewish immigration into Israel
Reply #27 - Nov 27th, 2012 at 11:02am
 
freediver wrote on Nov 26th, 2012 at 6:56pm:
Why do you so begrudge my efforts to correct his anti semitic propaganda?


Probably because you do it by recycling the same tired old islamophobic propaganda. Answering bigotry with bigotry is less than constructive.

I have tried to give you the context of the conflict and why the arab nations have been at war with Israel, but you continue with the tired "muslims just attempted their own holocaust" - because after all, don't all muslims want to slaughter jews just for the hell of it?
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19444
Gender: male
Re: illegal Jewish immigration into Israel
Reply #28 - Nov 27th, 2012 at 11:33am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Nov 27th, 2012 at 11:02am:
Probably because you do it by recycling the same tired old islamophobic propaganda. Answering bigotry with bigotry is less than constructive.



Islamophobia is a techically and logically incorrect term invented by muslims to hurl slurs at critics of Islam, they also use racist despite the fact muslims are not a race of people and when that fails they resort to bigot.

Quote:
Phobia (n)
a persistent irrational fear of a specific object,activity or situation that leads to a compelling desire to avoid it.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/phobia
If FD was Islamophobic then he should have a compelling desire to avoid Islam yet he constantly seeks out Abu instead of avoiding Islam

Islam is an ideology a set of beliefs that guide life for muslims,it is a fallacy that one can be phobic of beliefs.



Phobias are a medical condition ,arrogant muslims claim you are in need of medical treatment when they throw the technically and logically incorrect term Islamophobia.
Here is a list of real phobias and take note the medical profession does not recognise Islamophobia.
http://psychology.about.com/od/phobias/a/phobialist.htm

We should start calling muslims Judeophobic when they criticise Israel.


Back to top
« Last Edit: Nov 27th, 2012 at 11:40am by Baronvonrort »  

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: illegal Jewish immigration into Israel
Reply #29 - Nov 27th, 2012 at 11:47am
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 27th, 2012 at 11:33am:
Islamophobia is a techically and logically incorrect term


I'm pretty sure I've been through this before, and furthermore I'm almost certain I was answering you.

Islamophobia is real, it is understood, and it is has been demonstrated and documented. It is a type of racism, but as you correctly point out,  islam is not a "race", so therefore it is more commonly referred to as islamophobia. Even so, the cognitive processes that lead to both are basically the same. Persecuting a woman because they wear an islamic hijab is no different to persecuting someone because they have dark coloured skin.

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 27th, 2012 at 11:33am:
We should start calling muslims Judeophobic when they criticise Israel.


The correct term is "anti-semitic" - and it is levelled against muslims and anyone who dare criticise Israel all the time. Of course technically, to describe an anti-semite as someone who hates jews is wrong since semite refers to a linguistic group (incorporating hebrew speakers as well as a bunch of others including arabic). But who cares? English is full of incorrectly defined words, it doesn't matter. We all know what it means - anti-semitic means anti jew, just as islamophobic means anti muslim.


Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Send Topic Print