Australian Politics Forum - Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?
Reply #225 - Nov 27^th, 2012 at 6:59pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 27^th, 2012 at 1:44pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 27^th, 2012 at 1:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 27^th, 2012 at 1:02pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 27^th, 2012 at 12:57pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 27^th, 2012 at 12:52pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 27^th, 2012 at 12:49pm:

And yes - there's a chance the AGW hypothesis could be incorrect.
THere's a chance that any hypothesis could be incorrect.

At last!

At last what?!?!

At last an AGW disciple admits that the AGW hypothesis could be incorrect.

Put the strawman down Greggery. We are not interested.

We are still waiting for an explanation. Remenber - you told us that the measurement of C12/C13 ratios in atmospheric CO2 is not credible evidence to demonstrate that majority of the increase in concentration of atmospheric CO2 is anthropogenic in origin. You told us was not credible - and when asked to explain why it wasn't credible - you couldn't

Are you ready to explain your statement to us yet?
Do you have any basis for it?
Or was it just something Bolty told you?

Um, no: I have no intention of explaining anything to you.

You are shown evidence.
You claim it is "not credible"
When asked why it is "not credible" - you run away.

Good work Greggery.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 27^th, 2012 at 1:44pm:

My views on the subject aren't that important (and neither are yours).

Yes - we know Greggery
You are shown evidence.
You claim it is "not credible"
When asked why it is "not credible" - you run away.

At least I am able to support my opinions Greggery.
I don't just parrot somthing I saw on the Bolt show, like you do.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 27^th, 2012 at 1:44pm:

More importantly, I'm not out to change anyone's mind.

Yes - we know Greggery
You are shown evidence.
You claim it is "not credible"
When asked why it is "not credible" - you run away.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 27^th, 2012 at 1:44pm:

I just wanted to see if there was at least one AGW disciple who would be willing to acknowledge that the AGW hypothesis could be incorrect.

Nice strawman Greggery.

Why don't you try explaining your opinions before you start telling silly lies and trying to invent arguments that don't exist.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 27^th, 2012 at 1:44pm:

Mission accomplished.

You seem to set yourself very low goals Greggery.

Why don't you make your next mission:

I must not express stupid opinions that I am unable to support.

Back to top

IP Logged

MOTR

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6646

Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?
Reply #226 - Nov 28^th, 2012 at 2:05am

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 27^th, 2012 at 3:37pm:

JC Denton wrote on Nov 27^th, 2012 at 3:13pm:

aka im a dumb ignorant bugger!!!!

Oh, Ash-Leigh. Don't tell me you're one of those silly AGW disciples who think there's absolutely no chance that the AGW hypothesis could be incorrect. That's not very scientific of you.

Tsk tsk Roll Eyes

We all know the meaning of the word hypothesis, greggery. It just so happens that this hypothesis is all but certain and the implications are dire.

Back to top

Hunt says Coalition accepts IPCC findings

"What does this mean? It means that we need to do practical things that actually reduce emissions."

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 156299
Gender: male

Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?
Reply #227 - Nov 28^th, 2012 at 8:08pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 27^th, 2012 at 6:59pm:

You are shown evidence.
You claim it is "not credible"
When asked why it is "not credible" - you run away.

What is your point, exactly?

You go on and on, but don't seem to have any point.

My point is : the AGW hypothesis may be incorrect. You've now admitted this.

What exactly is your point? Do you even know?

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?
Reply #228 - Nov 28^th, 2012 at 8:11pm

MOTR wrote on Nov 28^th, 2012 at 2:05am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 27^th, 2012 at 3:37pm:

JC Denton wrote on Nov 27^th, 2012 at 3:13pm:

aka im a dumb ignorant bugger!!!!

Oh, Ash-Leigh. Don't tell me you're one of those silly AGW disciples who think there's absolutely no chance that the AGW hypothesis could be incorrect. That's not very scientific of you.

Tsk tsk Roll Eyes

We all know the meaning of the word hypothesis, greggery. It just so happens that this hypothesis is all but certain and the implications are dire.

WHAT'S THE BET HIS GRADES WEREN'T GOOD ENOUGH FOR ACTUARY!?!?

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 156299
Gender: male

Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?
Reply #229 - Nov 28^th, 2012 at 8:14pm

MOTR wrote on Nov 28^th, 2012 at 2:05am:

It just so happens that this hypothesis is all but certain ...

Is there any chance at all that it could be incorrect?

MOTR wrote on Nov 28^th, 2012 at 2:05am:

... and the implications are dire.

And what is your point, exactly?

I've said at least a dozen times that I have no problem whatsoever with people erring on the side of caution.

Have as many carbon taxes as you like: I couldn't care less.

Move all infrastructure away from the coast, and tax me more to pay for it: I couldn't care less.

You know this, so that's why I have to ask: what is your point?

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

brumbie

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 994
Gender: male

Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?
Reply #230 - Nov 28^th, 2012 at 9:07pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 28^th, 2012 at 8:14pm:

MOTR wrote on Nov 28^th, 2012 at 2:05am:

It just so happens that this hypothesis is all but certain ...

Is there any chance at all that it could be incorrect?

MOTR wrote on Nov 28^th, 2012 at 2:05am:

... and the implications are dire.

And what is your point, exactly?

I've said at least a dozen times that I have no problem whatsoever with people erring on the side of caution.

Have as many carbon taxes as you like: I couldn't care less.

Move all infrastructure away from the coast, and tax me more to pay for it: I couldn't care less.

You know this, so that's why I have to ask: what is your point?

You know I've watced and observed you...you aint spot...you are somebody with a mind that is leftist..but it has a ability to react without calling names...you can talk about subjects without conforming to name calling..you're good...in fact you're unique..not many lefties can actually sustain an arguement ..let alone remaining a leftie...you're good kid...

And you are a kid coz you're a leftie...used to be there when i was a kid...nothing wrong with that...but you are talking to adults.....on a adult forum

Back to top

« Last Edit: Nov 28^th, 2012 at 9:14pm by brumbie »

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 156299
Gender: male

Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?
Reply #231 - Nov 28^th, 2012 at 9:14pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 27^th, 2012 at 6:59pm:

Nice strawman Greggery.

Why don't you try explaining your opinions before you start telling silly lies and trying to invent arguments that don't exist.

You seem to be very confused.

My argument has always been that the AGW hypothesis is merely that - a hypothesis - and there is a chance it could be wrong.

I've never said that it's wrong, and I've never argued the point for an alternative hypothesis (although I have pointed out that others do exist). I merely object to the AGW disciples who ignore all scientific principles by declaring that AGW is "scientific fact" (when there is actually no such thing). Additionally, I object to the scaremongering.

There's no straw man here. I'm staying right on topic. It's you who seems to have gone off on a tangent.

Try to focus in the future, OK?

So, just to recap:

I just wanted to see if there was at least one AGW disciple who would be willing to acknowledge that the AGW hypothesis could be incorrect. You have done that.

Mission accomplished.

Was there anything else?

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 156299 Gender:	Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2? Reply #232 - Nov 28^th, 2012 at 9:19pm brumbie wrote on Nov 28^th, 2012 at 9:07pm: ...but you are talking to adults.....on a adult forum Hitherto, I've seen very little to support that claim.
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

brumbie Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 994 Gender:	Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2? Reply #233 - Nov 28^th, 2012 at 9:20pm If Rabitoh is ageeing with me then sorry mate.
Back to top	IP Logged