Australian Politics Forum - Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?

greggerypeccary Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 156429 Gender:	Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2? Reply #120 - Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:06pm rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:02pm: You have been shown credible, convincing evidence. .... Nope. Still waiting on that. Still waiting on an answer to this too: Why is it so important to you that everybody subscribes to the AGW hypothesis?
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?
Reply #121 - Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:08pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:04pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 10:53pm:

.
What is the next bit you don't understand?

Why is it so important to you that everybody subscribes to the AGW hypothesis?

Oh - and it is important Greggery because AGW will have a significant impact on the lives of my children. I think it would be a good idea to minimise that impact if I could.

I am sorry if you find that unreasonable.

Back to top

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?
Reply #122 - Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:09pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:06pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:02pm:

You have been shown credible, convincing evidence. ....

Nope.

Still waiting on that.

Still waiting on an answer to this too:

Why is it so important to you that everybody subscribes to the AGW hypothesis?

Perhaps you might like to explain to us why you think that measuring the C12/C13 ratio of atmospheric carbon is not a credible way of determining the sources of that atmospheric carbon.

The floor is yours Greggery.....

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 156429
Gender: male

Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?
Reply #123 - Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:11pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:04pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 10:53pm:

.
What is the next bit you don't understand?

Why is it so important to you that everybody subscribes to the AGW hypothesis?

Oh - and it is important Greggery because AGW will have a significant impact on the lives of my children. I think it would be a good idea to minimise that impact if I could.

I am sorry if you find that unreasonable.

Why do you think I have any objection to minimising the possible impact?

When exactly, did I say that minimising the possible impact is unreasonable?

Can you provide a link?

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?
Reply #124 - Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:12pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:11pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:04pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 10:53pm:

.
What is the next bit you don't understand?

Why is it so important to you that everybody subscribes to the AGW hypothesis?

Oh - and it is important Greggery because AGW will have a significant impact on the lives of my children. I think it would be a good idea to minimise that impact if I could.

I am sorry if you find that unreasonable.

Why do you think I have any objection to minimising the possible impact?

When exactly, did I say that minimising the possible impact is unreasonable?

Can you provide a link?

You are in denial that there is an impact Greggery.

Perhaps you might like to explain to us why you think that measuring the C12/C13 ratio of atmospheric carbon is not a credible way of determining the sources of that atmospheric carbon.

The floor is yours Greggery.....

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 156429
Gender: male

Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?
Reply #125 - Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:12pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:11pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:04pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 10:53pm:

.
What is the next bit you don't understand?

Why is it so important to you that everybody subscribes to the AGW hypothesis?

Oh - and it is important Greggery because AGW will have a significant impact on the lives of my children. I think it would be a good idea to minimise that impact if I could.

I am sorry if you find that unreasonable.

Why do you think I have any objection to minimising the possible impact?

When exactly, did I say that minimising the possible impact is unreasonable?

Can you provide a link?

Why do you think I have any objection to minimising the possible impact?

When exactly, did I say that minimising the possible impact is unreasonable?

Link?

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?
Reply #126 - Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:14pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:12pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:11pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:04pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 10:53pm:

.
What is the next bit you don't understand?

Why is it so important to you that everybody subscribes to the AGW hypothesis?

Oh - and it is important Greggery because AGW will have a significant impact on the lives of my children. I think it would be a good idea to minimise that impact if I could.

I am sorry if you find that unreasonable.

Why do you think I have any objection to minimising the possible impact?

When exactly, did I say that minimising the possible impact is unreasonable?

Can you provide a link?

Why do you think I have any objection to minimising the possible impact?

When exactly, did I say that minimising the possible impact is unreasonable?

Link?

You are in denial that there is an impact Greggery.

Perhaps you might like to explain to us why you think that measuring the C12/C13 ratio of atmospheric carbon is not a credible way of determining the sources of that atmospheric carbon.

The floor is yours Greggery.....

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 156429
Gender: male

Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?
Reply #127 - Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:23pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:04pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 10:53pm:

.
What is the next bit you don't understand?

Why is it so important to you that everybody subscribes to the AGW hypothesis?

Oh - and it is important Greggery because AGW will have a significant impact on the lives of my children. I think it would be a good idea to minimise that impact if I could.

I am sorry if you find that unreasonable.

Oops. You made an (incorrect) assumption about me. Didn't you?

You thought that just because I don't support the AGW hypothesis, that I'm against taking preventative action.

Oops. Silly boy.

"I have no problem with erring on the side of caution."

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1351704919/12#12

I have absolutely no objection to carbon taxes or any other measures you want to take which may or may not save us from climate change.

I challenge you to find a post of mine that proves otherwise.

Seems you really dropped the ball on this one.

Sage advice for young players: don't make assumptions based on ignorance.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

rabbitoh07 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2783 Gender:	Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2? Reply #128 - Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:24pm BTW Greg: didn't you used to post at a different forum with a moniker referring to a male relative and a source of protein? I am sure we have had this discussion before
Back to top	IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?
Reply #129 - Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:27pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:23pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:04pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 10:53pm:

.
What is the next bit you don't understand?

Why is it so important to you that everybody subscribes to the AGW hypothesis?

Oh - and it is important Greggery because AGW will have a significant impact on the lives of my children. I think it would be a good idea to minimise that impact if I could.

I am sorry if you find that unreasonable.

Oops. You made an (incorrect) assumption about me. Didn't you?

You thought that just because I don't support the AGW hypothesis, that I'm against taking preventative action.

You are denying there is a problem.
Why would you take preventative action against a problem you deny exists?

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:23pm:

Oops. Silly boy.

"I have no problem with erring on the side of caution."

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1351704919/12#12

I have absolutely no objection to carbon taxes or any other measures you want to take which may or may not save us from climate change.

I challenge you to find a post of mine that proves otherwise.

Seems you really dropped the ball on this one.

Sage advice for young players: don't make assumptions based on ignorance.

What does this have to do with you willfully ignoring the evidence you have been shown?

Perhaps you might like to explain to us why you think that measuring the C12/C13 ratio of atmospheric carbon is not a credible way of determining the sources of that atmospheric carbon.

The floor is yours Greggery.....

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 156429
Gender: male

Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?
Reply #130 - Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:39pm

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:27pm:

You are denying there is a problem.
Why would you take preventative action against a problem you deny exists?

Yes, but I have no problem in taking preventative action if it makes the AGW alarmists happy.

It's no skin off my nose (and I might be wrong about AGW).

I don't mind paying extra (carbon) taxes.

I don't mind catching the bus.

I don't mind changing my light bulbs.

If it makes other people happy, and doesn't impinge on my lifestyle, I don't mind taking precautionary measures.

I'm all about making everyone happy.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 156429 Gender:	Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2? Reply #131 - Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:53pm rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:24pm: BTW Greg: didn't you used to post at a different forum with a moniker referring to a male relative and a source of protein? Father Sperm?
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

rabbitoh07 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2783 Gender:	Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2? Reply #132 - Nov 16^th, 2012 at 12:03am greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:53pm: rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:24pm: BTW Greg: didn't you used to post at a different forum with a moniker referring to a male relative and a source of protein? Father Sperm? o wow...Catholic school flashback!!!!!
Back to top	IP Logged

rabbitoh07

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2783
Gender: male

Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?
Reply #133 - Nov 16^th, 2012 at 12:04am

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:39pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:27pm:

You are denying there is a problem.
Why would you take preventative action against a problem you deny exists?

Yes, but I have no problem in taking preventative action if it makes the AGW alarmists happy.

It's no skin off my nose (and I might be wrong about AGW).

I don't mind paying extra (carbon) taxes.

I don't mind catching the bus.

I don't mind changing my light bulbs.

If it makes other people happy, and doesn't impinge on my lifestyle, I don't mind taking precautionary measures.

I'm all about making everyone happy.

Perhaps you might like to explain to us why you think that measuring the C12/C13 ratio of atmospheric carbon is not a credible way of determining the sources of that atmospheric carbon.

The floor is yours Greggery.....

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 156429
Gender: male

Re: Will Huricane Sandy force the world to act on co2?
Reply #134 - Nov 16^th, 2012 at 12:04am

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 16^th, 2012 at 12:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:53pm:

rabbitoh07 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2012 at 11:24pm:

BTW Greg:

didn't you used to post at a different forum with a moniker referring to a male relative and a source of protein?

Father Sperm?

o wow...Catholic school flashback!!!!!