Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge (Read 1592 times)
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge
Reply #15 - Oct 21st, 2012 at 3:48pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 11:38am:
cods wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 8:37am:
[quote author=466561535C79686860692148796F670C0 link=1350730755/8#8 date=1350770117]Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge

If you can believe the information supplied about either then Jackson looks at least as dirty as Thomson, maybe worse.[/quote]



no one could be worse than THOMO wishful thinking on your part.. as gillard supported him through thick and thin..



She supported him to the cross benches and out of the Labor party.

You don't need friends like that.




after 12 months of support... or would you prefer to forget that bit?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge
Reply #16 - Oct 21st, 2012 at 3:55pm
 
John S wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 2:08pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Oct 20th, 2012 at 10:08pm:
John S wrote on Oct 20th, 2012 at 10:05pm:
From Pickering web site he is a nut case and anyone that believes anything from him is just as bad


He doesnt need to be believed, just like that labor hack site you continue to use and anyone that believes the content is a moron. Kathy Jackson will be vindicated.


the web site I quote from Independent Australia The Political Sword The New Matilda and a lot more are lot more informative then the sites like kangaroo court and pickering sites that you post from.

The all the sites I post from the contributors post links from other sites to back up their argument that has the evidence to support them. it is more then the sites you post from it is only one man opinion and you think it is gospel truth.

But I can't be too hard on you lolly you need a brain to understand these things and as you are 16 and in the same class as 6 year old children I can imagine that your brain is not fully develop.




since when???? I have only ever seen the "independent"... pages from it from you and your alto ego valleyboy doing its level best to blame someone else for THOMOs position



has the independent called on anyone to take him to court like pickering has..???????

he is very bold if he doesnt have something else he isnt letting go of.. and gillard and THOMO know what its most likely to be..

just for you I mainly read the papers.. these other privately owned webs that never use the owners name worry me...they could be run by terrorists for all I know.. at least everyone knows pickering.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John S
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Fascist Party = Liberal
Party

Posts: 3691
Gender: male
Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge
Reply #17 - Oct 21st, 2012 at 4:15pm
 
cods wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 3:55pm:
John S wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 2:08pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Oct 20th, 2012 at 10:08pm:
John S wrote on Oct 20th, 2012 at 10:05pm:
From Pickering web site he is a nut case and anyone that believes anything from him is just as bad


He doesnt need to be believed, just like that labor hack site you continue to use and anyone that believes the content is a moron. Kathy Jackson will be vindicated.


the web site I quote from Independent Australia The Political Sword The New Matilda and a lot more are lot more informative then the sites like kangaroo court and pickering sites that you post from.

The all the sites I post from the contributors post links from other sites to back up their argument that has the evidence to support them. it is more then the sites you post from it is only one man opinion and you think it is gospel truth.

But I can't be too hard on you lolly you need a brain to understand these things and as you are 16 and in the same class as 6 year old children I can imagine that your brain is not fully develop.




since when???? I have only ever seen the "independent"... pages from it from you and your alto ego valleyboy doing its level best to blame someone else for THOMOs position



has the independent called on anyone to take him to court like pickering has..???????

he is very bold if he doesnt have something else he isnt letting go of.. and gillard and THOMO know what its most likely to be..

just for you I mainly read the papers.. these other privately owned webs that never use the owners name worry me...they could be run by terrorists for all I know.. at least everyone knows pickering.


you don't look at things much do you cods

this is a bit from Alan Jones greatest Hits

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1350767031

have a look at the bits in red and those are links back to other web site to back up the argument

Quote:
“Cash for comment”


Between 1999 and 2000, the
Cash for comment
investigation was conducted. Jones had been accused of contracting to have personal commercial support in exchange for favourable “unscripted” comments, principally for
Telstra
and
Qantas
, during his radio show. The independent
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
TV show,
Media Watch
, was heavily involved in exposing these practices. The Australian Broadcasting Authority finally decided that disclosure had to be made, hence the “Commercial Agreement Register” at the Jones portion of his station’s web site. (Jones was investigated along with John Laws from 2UE.)……. 

Appendix to Cash for Comment - Impartiality of Flint


In April 2004, another scandal broke after it was revealed the Chairman of the
Australian Broadcasting Authority, David Flint,
who had headed the
Cash for comment inquiries,
had sent a stream of admiring letters to Alan Jones.This called into question the impartiality of Flint, and the then Federal Minister for Communications,
Daryl Williams
, was embroiled in media speculation as to the future of Flint. With an inquiry imminent, Flint resigned. In an appearance on the
ABC Enough Rope, John Laws
accused Jones of placing pressure on Prime Minister John Howard to keep Flint as head of the ABA, made comments that many viewers took to imply a sexual relationship between Jones and Flint and broadly hinted that Jones was homosexual like Flint, who is openly gay.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=cNtwR-_Yh1Y

\

If you go back to the original article that I posted and click onto any of those links it will take you to a web site that will back up the article.

Where are the ones from Pickering to back up his article?
Back to top
 

'The worst Labor Government is always better then the best Liberal government for Australians workers'
WWW  
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge
Reply #18 - Oct 21st, 2012 at 7:52pm
 
John S wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 2:08pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Oct 20th, 2012 at 10:08pm:
John S wrote on Oct 20th, 2012 at 10:05pm:
From Pickering web site he is a nut case and anyone that believes anything from him is just as bad


He doesnt need to be believed, just like that labor hack site you continue to use and anyone that believes the content is a moron. Kathy Jackson will be vindicated.


the web site I quote from Independent Australia The Political Sword The New Matilda and a lot more are lot more informative then the sites like kangaroo court and pickering sites that you post from.

The all the sites I post from the contributors post links from other sites to back up their argument that has the evidence to support them. it is more then the sites you post from it is only one man opinion and you think it is gospel truth.

But I can't be too hard on you lolly you need a brain to understand these things and as you are 16 and in the same class as 6 year old children I can imagine that your brain is not fully develop.

good for you. If anyone believes the crap they write are morons.

You dont really think you can say whatever you like about what I link to and get nothing in reply do you. Escpecially with the crap from that labor site you link to. You must be Tarded
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 62055
Here
Gender: male
Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge
Reply #19 - Oct 21st, 2012 at 8:17pm
 
cods wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 3:48pm:
Dnarever wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 11:38am:
cods wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 8:37am:
[quote author=466561535C79686860692148796F670C0 link=1350730755/8#8 date=1350770117]Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge

If you can believe the information supplied about either then Jackson looks at least as dirty as Thomson, maybe worse.[/quote]



no one could be worse than THOMO wishful thinking on your part.. as gillard supported him through thick and thin..



She supported him to the cross benches and out of the Labor party.

You don't need friends like that.




after 12 months of support... or would you prefer to forget that bit?


People should get the benifit of the doubt for as long as is reasonable. Remember 3 or 4 investigations with no charges and only ongoing because the Liberals kept digging it up even when the ploice were saying that it was dead.

Waiting for the damaged fair work investigation to complete was only reasonable. She did need some reason to take action.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 37969
Gender: male
Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge
Reply #20 - Oct 22nd, 2012 at 7:18am
 
i still think kathy is incredibly hot.  i could forgive thommo if he paid her for sex and that wouldnt have even affected the HSU budget
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge
Reply #21 - Oct 22nd, 2012 at 7:47am
 
John S wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 4:15pm:
cods wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 3:55pm:
John S wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 2:08pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Oct 20th, 2012 at 10:08pm:
John S wrote on Oct 20th, 2012 at 10:05pm:
From Pickering web site he is a nut case and anyone that believes anything from him is just as bad


He doesnt need to be believed, just like that labor hack site you continue to use and anyone that believes the content is a moron. Kathy Jackson will be vindicated.


the web site I quote from Independent Australia The Political Sword The New Matilda and a lot more are lot more informative then the sites like kangaroo court and pickering sites that you post from.

The all the sites I post from the contributors post links from other sites to back up their argument that has the evidence to support them. it is more then the sites you post from it is only one man opinion and you think it is gospel truth.

But I can't be too hard on you lolly you need a brain to understand these things and as you are 16 and in the same class as 6 year old children I can imagine that your brain is not fully develop.




since when???? I have only ever seen the "independent"... pages from it from you and your alto ego valleyboy doing its level best to blame someone else for THOMOs position



has the independent called on anyone to take him to court like pickering has..???????

he is very bold if he doesnt have something else he isnt letting go of.. and gillard and THOMO know what its most likely to be..

just for you I mainly read the papers.. these other privately owned webs that never use the owners name worry me...they could be run by terrorists for all I know.. at least everyone knows pickering.


you don't look at things much do you cods

this is a bit from Alan Jones greatest Hits

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1350767031

have a look at the bits in red and those are links back to other web site to back up the argument

Quote:
“Cash for comment”


Between 1999 and 2000, the
Cash for comment
investigation was conducted. Jones had been accused of contracting to have personal commercial support in exchange for favourable “unscripted” comments, principally for
Telstra
and
Qantas
, during his radio show. The independent
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
TV show,
Media Watch
, was heavily involved in exposing these practices. The Australian Broadcasting Authority finally decided that disclosure had to be made, hence the “Commercial Agreement Register” at the Jones portion of his station’s web site. (Jones was investigated along with John Laws from 2UE.)……. 

Appendix to Cash for Comment - Impartiality of Flint


In April 2004, another scandal broke after it was revealed the Chairman of the
Australian Broadcasting Authority, David Flint,
who had headed the
Cash for comment inquiries,
had sent a stream of admiring letters to Alan Jones.This called into question the impartiality of Flint, and the then Federal Minister for Communications,
Daryl Williams
, was embroiled in media speculation as to the future of Flint. With an inquiry imminent, Flint resigned. In an appearance on the
ABC Enough Rope, John Laws
accused Jones of placing pressure on Prime Minister John Howard to keep Flint as head of the ABA, made comments that many viewers took to imply a sexual relationship between Jones and Flint and broadly hinted that Jones was homosexual like Flint, who is openly gay.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=cNtwR-_Yh1Y

\

If you go back to the original article that I posted and click onto any of those links it will take you to a web site that will back up the article.

Where are the ones from Pickering to back up his article?





ahhhhhhhhhhhh you assume to much I am afraid I hardly read you...so  I thought you meant when you post your original threads by independent.. my mistake...

but never assume anything about myself...I am very interested in this subject...that is the only reason I read your piece..

in the mean time neither you nor the independent interest me..
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge
Reply #22 - Oct 22nd, 2012 at 7:58am
 
Dnarever wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 8:17pm:
cods wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 3:48pm:
Dnarever wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 11:38am:
cods wrote on Oct 21st, 2012 at 8:37am:
[quote author=466561535C79686860692148796F670C0 link=1350730755/8#8 date=1350770117]Kathy Jackson to be vindicated. Thomson 2 B charge

If you can believe the information supplied about either then Jackson looks at least as dirty as Thomson, maybe worse.[/quote]



no one could be worse than THOMO wishful thinking on your part.. as gillard supported him through thick and thin..



She supported him to the cross benches and out of the Labor party.

You don't need friends like that.




after 12 months of support... or would you prefer to forget that bit?


People should get the benifit of the doubt for as long as is reasonable. Remember 3 or 4 investigations with no charges and only ongoing because the Liberals kept digging it up even when the ploice were saying that it was dead.

Waiting for the damaged fair work investigation to complete was only reasonable. She did need some reason to take action.


excuses excuses excuse.

sorry dna.. I cant believe the lengths you go to to excuse this govts behaviour..

she supported him for over 12 months.. during that time they managed to promote the man that was overseeing the investigation into THOMO so it was all stalled..

by the time this started to get into the media..it was all ready in the FWA hands for many many months..

it wasnt 3 or 4 investigations.. it was one.. into misusing union funds..... Kathy Jackson was advised to give her suspicions.to FWA...



yes I am sure you would LOVE this to die and just go away..no one from the right is surprised at that dna...it must be a real salt in the wound for you everytime you see a new thread..

suck it up sunshine.. its going to get wors.e.


good on the libs.. you never give them credit for anything... this time hopfully it will be those union members... you know the ones the people you dont care about...[as you would wish this would die... bugger those libs]

get the money back... money they worked for and didnt intend to buy houses or pay for brothel visits...sorry us libs are such bad people.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print