abu_rashid wrote on Sep 24
th, 2012 at 11:46pm:
freediver wrote on Sep 23
rd, 2012 at 7:33pm:
So the government tricked 400 Muslims into marching behind the beheading posters?
Don't know where you got this from...
Perhaps you should have checked the post I was responding to. I did quote it for you. You complained about the government demonising muslims. Is it the government's fault that 400 Muslims marched through Sydney behind signs calling for murder? The government actually does its best to suck up to the Muslim community. Even if it didn't, it could hardly compete with Muslims themselves in making Muslims look evil.
Quote:freediver wrote on Sep 23
rd, 2012 at 7:33pm:
I don't recall ever seeing 400 people march through Sydney calling for murder.
Neither do I.... when did this occur again?
At the Sydney protests. Are you another person who claims they know better than the protestors themselves what they were calling for?
freediver wrote on Sep 23
rd, 2012 at 7:33pm:
You also missed this Abu:
freediver wrote on Sep 21
st, 2012 at 8:22am:
Quote:It is inappropriate to display such signs in a country with a legal system that does not implement capital punishment, and which considers such punishment to be unjust.
Would it be appropriate in places like the US that do have capital punishment and consider it just?
Was there anything inappropriate about the reference to blasphemy, or was it only the reference to the punishment that was inappropriate?
Quote:There's just simply no need for such signs, as the ones carrying them do not live under an Islamic system, and therefore even speaking about Islamic punishments is just nonsensical.
You speak about Islamic punishments here quite often. Do you make sense?
Quote:The debate, in reality, is about peddling xenophobic garbage in order to justify the government's actions here and abroad.
So it has nothing to do with freedom of speech and blasphemy? It has nothing to do with that video that insulted Muhammed? Were the Muslims just pretending to be upset about that?
It may be more appropriate in the U.S, dunno. Are we in the U.S? Are you able to keep the conversation relevant?
Of course it is relevant. I am trying to figure out what exactly you consider inappropriate about the signs the protestors were marching with. The fact that we don't have capital punishment for other crimes seems like a technicality. Are you sure there is nothing else you consider inappropriate?
Quote:I never spoke about Islamic punishments ever here. You are the one who spends an unnatural amount of your time trying to ignite conversations about them.
This is a politics forum on a politics website Abu. Crime and punishment is going to come up. It's not like this is an insignificant part of Islam. Like it or not, it is the bit that non-Muslims are most interested in, given the extreme political nature of Islam compared to other religions.
Quote:Again... not really following.
You appeared to claim that you have not been indoctrinated into any religion and can view all religions in an unbiased manner.
Quote:No raping and pillaging in Islam at all. If you're referring to war booty and concubines, then perhaps you've never actually read the Bible?
What were you saying about keeping it relevant? Are you now claiming that the bits in the Koran about raping and pillaging are not actually about raping and pillaging because other religions have them too?
Quote:Pretty much every single head of state prophet in the Bible

Isn't this like me pretending that a reference to every non head of state prophet in the Koran is a reasonable generalisation?