John Smith wrote on Aug 23
rd, 2012 at 10:54pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23
rd, 2012 at 10:21pm:
John Smith wrote on Aug 23
rd, 2012 at 10:18pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Aug 23
rd, 2012 at 10:09pm:
skippy. wrote on Aug 23
rd, 2012 at 10:07pm:
How does it feel to be in the news prog? Even it is for being a loony nut job, your family must be proud.

matty is envious, it's a win win.
fantastic. Gillard just put a move on herself, thinking she put a move on the media who were not prepared.
It is what comes out after this dog act of gillards, that will directly conflict with what she has now said in public and on media. It will come out because it is known that gillard is too scared to go to court on defamation.
you really do need help don't you?..... I've said it before and I'll say it again, no matter how much you want her to be guilty, all the facts prove she isn't .... you wanting it so, does not make it real ... now go and play with your voodoo doll or something, maybe you'll have more luck with that one, although I don't like your chances ...
I didnt say she was guilty. Maybe you are feeling guilty of something.
Now you go play with your corrupt labor mates and rip the little people off.
you don't have to say it, you certainly implied it ... one example of many is
On a side note, Gillard is not out of the woods just yet. now if there is no evidence of any wrong doing why would you say that unless you thought she was guilty ... it would be a little like me saying 'there is no evidence of progs performing acts of beastiality, but she's not out of the woods yet'.... what would you say that implied?
why has not one of your comments being about the fact that there is no evidence of any wrongdoing? like I said, stick to the voodoo doll ....
Most of my post are cut and paste, so you would need to refer the author.
the author is you ...your second comment on this thread .... you've no idea what you are saying do you?
As for 'not out of the woods', gillard ambushed the media that were not prepared with questions. She may have been advised to go for it now and without warning, but that does not make it go away. The questions that are well thought out will linger.
they had every opportunity to ask whatever questions they liked ... the reason it wasn't asked was because they already knew the answer ..she did nothing wrong ...
The fact the bagman has not had his day in the sun makes that a possible bad situation for gillard. If he has actual evidence that goes against what gillard said in public, on media, then its good night gillard.
what are you on about? who is bagman?
Wilson is even shopping around for media dollars to air his information. Dont know what he has, good or bad for gillard, but if it is concrete evidence and conflicts with gillards statements today, then that may well mean good night for gillard as well.
the fact that he is shopping around should be the first indication that he has no integrity, and if so why should he be believed ? didn't channel 9 pay for the story from the prostitue that slept with thommo? the one you were sure proved he was guilty? the one that wasn't even in this country at the time of the offense ?
It wouldn't be the first time labor adviser's have screwed up royally, actually it would not be the first 20 times.
thats got nothing to do with the price of eggs in China .