Yadda
|
SPOT should be permanently banned, imo Yadda FD, Though mildly annoying, i don't mind SPOT copying the content of my posts, and presenting the material [in my post] as SPOT's own rant, but i do object to SPOT "quoting" my [own] post, and then editing the content [of my [own] "QUOTED" post] SO AS TO MISREPRESENT WHAT I HAVE SAID. n.b. This material, which SPOT has edited, is being presented with a "Yadda wrote" in the heading. Presenting this material in this way, would lead a casual observer of this post in the OzPol forum, TO ASSUME THAT SPOT'S 'EDITING', WAS ALSO PRESENT IN MY OWN POST. FD, I normally would >> never << ask for a person to be banned from any forum, n.b. for expressing their own opinion. And i do believe that the right of free speech, and open debate in forums such as OzPol, should be sacrosanct.BUT, that is not what SPOT is doing [.....i.e. expressing SPOT's argument/opinion]. What he/she has done, is to mischievously, and maliciously, misrepresent another person's statements/presentation in OzPol. IMO, this should not be allowed in a forum such as OzPol. FD, Response ?iAnd i have noted that SPOT has 'carelessly' done this on more than one occasion on OzPol. Here is the example i present; http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1344204563/314#314 Quote:YADDA = = dissembler OR, YADDA <>, is not 'kosher' Yadda wrote on Aug 18 th, 2012 at 4:36pm: freediver wrote on Aug 18 th, 2012 at 4:12pm: I have never seen anyone else use stupidity as a weapon the way yadda does. It is a new low. I have never seen anyone else pretend to have such difficulty following links - and this is a guy who has his own website and forum.
Which is a convincing reason to believe that; YADDA = = dissembler OR, YADDA <>, is not 'kosher' Dictionary; dissemble = = hide or disguise one’s true motives or feelings. +++ October 13th, 2010 10:23 THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A MODERATE ISLAM/MUSLIM .....But I see what most people say are “moderate Muslims" are those Muslims who work and live peacefully within their communities not causing any problems with their neighbours. But they, nevertheless are as devout in their beliefs as “orthodox Muslims" but exist peacefully. I assess such Muslims as most likely “dormant Muslims" or “sleeper Muslims" who are playing a low profile in an alien or unfriendly environment but may become activated when called upon. These are the Muslims who will not raise their voices against the Islamic Jihadists who perpetrated the 9/11 atrocities in New York, or the 7/7 carnage in London because it is not politic to do so. They may even rejoice quietly among themselves when they see Islam winning over non-Muslims. In fact these Muslims empathize with the cause of Islamic Jihadists worldwide but lie low. They will in all probability surreptitiously give material or spiritual or moral support to Islamic Jihadist quietly or demonstrate by dancing and shouting Allahu Akbar on occasions like 9/11 or 7/7. But they are, in truth, orthodox Muslims, living a quiet and peaceful life, and unobtrusive or lying low, yet loyally and piously Muslim. Perhaps he is even a Jihadist sleeper. Why the Deafening Silence from Moderate Muslims after 9/11 and 7/7 and others? Because if they are “religious" Muslims who know the commands of Allah and know the contents of the Qur’an but are lying low, hiding their real feelings and are unable to condemn such acts (as one Muslim never squeals on another,) because they know it is Allah’s Islamic Martyrdom at work, as the Qur’an has commanded: Qur’an:2:216 “Jihad [holy fighting in Allah's Cause] is ordained for you [Muslims], though you dislike it. But it is possible that you dislike a thing which is good for you, and like a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knows, and you know not." [Another translation reads] “Warfare is ordained for you." .... These Moderate Muslims are not Muslims who have accepted the peaceful aspects and rejected the militant aspects of Islam, because by rejecting any part of the Qur’an amounts to rejecting the Word of Allah, and that is blasphemy, and the penalty is death. So taking this into consideration, either a Muslim accepts the whole of Islam or he is an apostate. An apostate is not a Muslim, he is a “non-Muslim." So calling a Muslim a “Moderate Muslim" implies he is not an orthodox Muslim, but a “false Muslim." So either a Muslim is a Muslim accepting all the conditions expected of a Muslim or he is an apostate. There can be no half-Muslim. http://my.telegraph.co.uk/abdulmuhd/amuhd/203/there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-modera...Quoted from the article above.... ".....hiding their real feelings.." Taqiyya defined, at an ISLAMIC site... "The word "al-Taqiyya" literally means: "Concealing or disguising one's beliefs, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions, and/or strategies at a time of eminent danger, whether now or later in time, to save oneself from physical and/or mental injury." A one-word translation would be "Dissimulation." " http://www.al-islam.org/encyclopedia/chapter6b/1.htmlDictionary; dissimulate = = hide or disguise one’s thoughts or feelings. ‘to conceal’. FD, 'Gist' has also done this 'editing', of another persons "quoted" post. here... http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1343676442/6#6+++ So much to do, so little time. Back later.
|