Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 ... 24
Send Topic Print
Is Gillard about to be exposed (Read 71512 times)
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #180 - Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:08pm
 
progressiveslol wrote on Aug 19th, 2012 at 4:35pm:


FACEBOOK!!???!???  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin


I think Larry Pickering has long since stopped growing tomatoes and has been secretly growing some other tall green herb. For medicinal purposes you understand. And been taking FFFAAAAAAAARRRRR too much of it in.

And it looks like lolly is his biggest sucker fan.  Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #181 - Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:09pm
 
I'm really looking forward to this one! Can we call it TOMATOEGATE??!?

OOO!

OOO!

Larry could even use the ute to cart the tomatoes in!! That'd be PERFECT!!  Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
Gist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #182 - Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:13pm
 
HEY!

I see where Pickering has branched out from growing tomatoes and is now into chillies!

...
Back to top
 

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)
 
IP Logged
 
skippy.
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 20882
Gender: male
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #183 - Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:17pm
 
Gist wrote on Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:13pm:
HEY!

I see where Pickering has branched out from growing tomatoes and is now into chillies!

http://chilliandspice.com.au/images/products/preview/chilli%20seeds%20-%20peter%...

Does phony Tony know Larry has that "chillie"? Because phony tony will need it back for the next speedo photo shoot.
Back to top
 

  freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Shane B
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1473
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #184 - Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:17pm
 

PK: I want to refer to the article in yesterday’s Australian. Is it correct, that in 1995 you had to resign as a partner at Slater and Gordon as a result of their investigation into misappropriation of funds around the legal entity that you had established?

JG: I am not dignifying all of this scurrilous campaigning by going through these things point by point, Paul. We are talking about matters 17 years ago which have been dealt with on the public record for most of that time. As long as 15 years ago these matters were dealt with on the public record. I did nothing wrong. If you’ve got an allegation I did something wrong, then put it. If you don’t have an allegation I did something wrong then let’s ask a question that matters to the nation today. On Slater and Gordon you’re talking about a firm with which I’ve got continuing good relationships and as recently as the last few weeks was giving a speech in their building and greeting staff at their Sydney office.
PK: Okay, well, can I just ask, given your good relations with the firm, would you like to see them make some statement to clarify this matter?
JG: Look, what Slater and Gordon says is a matter for Slater and Gordon but, Paul, my essential point here is there’s delving into matters 17 years ago for what purpose? If you’ve got an allegation I did something wrong, put it. If you can’t put it, why are we talking about this?
PK: No, no, I’ve got no allegation but the point is ...
JG: Well, if you’ve got no allegation and I’ve not seen in yesterday’s Australian or anywhere else an allegation put about my conduct. If there is no allegation to deal with then why are we dealing with this issue when we could be dealing with the Australian economy, schools, health.
PK: No, we’re very keen to deal with those issues but there were a series of allegations made in yesterday’s Australian by a former senior partner which questioned your integrity. Surely you need to respond to those allegations?
JG: Well, I am not going to get into a circumstance where we’ve got people blogging malicious nonsense and we’ve got some of this penetrating to the media. I am not going to get myself into a circumstance where I’m going to spend my time dealing with these events 17 years ago when the people who are asking me questions about them are unable to even articulate what it is that they say I did wrong. This is just nonsense and a distraction from the important work I’ve got to do as Prime Minister and the important issues for this nation’s future. I’ve just said to you, Paul, I continue to have very good relationships with Slater and Gordon, you know, going and greeting the staff and all of that kind of stuff. It’s not the first time I’ve done that. It won’t be the last time I do that.
PK: Okay, I understand your point. You’re saying it’s all nonsense. Can I just ask you then this direct question .. .the central point ..
JG: Well, Paul I’ve dealt ....
PK: No, hang on… The central point was, the central point was the partner alleged you had to resign because of this issue, is that correct or not?
JG: Look, Paul, I did resign from Slater and Gordon, that’s a matter of public record. I made the decision to do that. All the rest of this is just the sort of scurrilous ....
PK: But you’re not answering this specific point ...
JG: Paul, I’m not getting in to specifics about issues 17 years ago when you are not able to put to me any contention about why this is relevant to my conduct as Prime Minister today. I mean join the dots for me, Paul. What matters about this today for Australia and me being Prime Minister? Just articulate that.
PK: Well, I will. The point is that a partner in your former firm has made a series of allegations which go to your integrity.
JG: And the relevance to me being Prime Minister today, Paul?

PK: Well, well, I think when accusations are made about the integrity of a Prime Minister going to the profession position she had before she came into politics ... surely that is relevant?
JG: And, Paul, I did nothing wrong. Are you challenging that?
PK: No, I’m just asking questions.
JG: Well, and this is the issue, isn’t it? Because I understand you’re being asked to ask questions today.
PK: No, no, no, sorry, there’s no-one asking me to ask questions.
JG: Well, that wasn’t my advice a little bit earlier before this show.
PK: Well, I’m sorry Prime Minister, I ask my own questions and nobody tells me what questions to ask.
JG: And I’ll give you an answer to them. I did nothing wrong, Paul. Have you got an allegation to put to me? If you do not, why are we discussing this?

PVO: Can I just ask one question on this and then we’ll move on. Last question. Why not just put it all out there? I believe you that you did nothing wrong. I made a comment on Friday on my show “The Contrarians” that I thought this is all a beat up and we should move on to the major issues. But why not just address it straight down the barrell so that we can move on and all of this scuttlebutt that goes on online, which frankly I’m sick of people emailing me about this, we can just move on from it.
JG: Well, Peter, let me welcome but also question your grand naivety. These people who are dealing with this online in their malicious and motivated way would not stop not matter what explanations I gave. You know that, I know that and that is why there is no point in flogging through all of the details of this because people who are pursuing this malicious campaign will continue to do it. They are not at all interested in the truth. The truth is I did nothing wrong. No-one has put any direct assertion to me. You haven’t done it today, it hasn’t been done in the newspaper that I did anything wrong. In these circumstances why are we 17 years later, when these matters have been dealt with on the public record for the best part of a decade and a half, still talking about this?
Back to top
 

Julia Gillard - twice selected, never elected.

We're still paying for the Whitlam Government.
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #185 - Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:19pm
 
It is a lurid tale involving an old political cartoonist, a retired lawyer, the Prime Minister and her former boyfriend, an alleged fraudster.

If you believe the cartoonist, Larry Pickering, whose dislike for Julia Gillard is palpable in his sometimes obscene cartoons, the scandalous details could finally bring down the Prime Minister.

But if you don't buy the claims Pickering is peddling about Ms Gillard when she was a Slater & Gordon lawyer acting for her then lover, Bruce Wilson - an alleged embezzler of Australian Workers Union funds - why hasn't she done anything to stop his vitriolic missives?


Lawyer turned author Harry Nowicki.

The case became even more intriguing yesterday when a former Slater & Gordon equity lawyer, Nick Styant-Browne, told The Australian that Ms Gillard had lost her job after an internal investigation by the law firm into work she had done for Mr Wilson. He said that, in a recorded interview, Ms Gillard said she could not categorically rule out she had personally benefited from union funds in the renovation of her home - although she believed she had paid for all the work and produced receipts. Mr Styant-Browne said the partners took a very serious view about the matter ''and accepted her resignation''.

Advertisement

A spokesman for Ms Gillard said yesterday that she had ''made it clear that she was not involved in any wrongdoing, and has dealt with these allegations previously''.

This story has dogged Ms Gillard over and over again since it was first raised under privilege in the Victorian Parliament in October 1995. At the time, she denied any wrongdoing and said she was still a partner at Slater & Gordon and ''had no intention of leaving''. Within months of the matters being raised by the then Victorian minister for industry and employment, Phil Gude, she had resigned and left the firm.


Cartoonist and storyteller Larry Pickering.

By 2007, when the issues were raised again, she was about to become the deputy prime minister. She said in a candid interview that she was ''young and naive'' when she fell for Bruce Morton Wilson, the alleged conman who is accused of siphoning off $500,000 in union funds while he was the AWU secretary in Western Australia and Victoria in the early 1990s.

''I was in a relationship, which I ended, and obviously it was all very distressing,'' she told the veteran political journalist Glenn Milne. ''I am by no means the first person to find out that someone close turns out to be different to what you had believed them to be. It's an ordinary human error.''

AWU officials blew the whistle on the alleged fraud in 1995 after discovering numerous unauthorised bank accounts in the name of the union allegedly set up by Mr Wilson. They complained to police in Western Australia and Victoria but no charges were ever laid. In Victoria, police had said there was not enough evidence. When the stories resurfaced yet again last year in a column by Milne, with a suggestion that Ms Gillard had unknowingly benefited from the alleged wrongdoing of Mr Wilson, she threatened legal action - and Milne was swiftly removed as a columnist with The Australian.

Yet for weeks now, Pickering has been publishing a running commentary, a veritable soap opera, entitled Is the Prime Minister a Crook? It is published on his website, The Pickering Post, which he also emails to a large list of subscribers. It makes allegations that are much worse than those aired in Milne's column.

Pickering goes as far as to say the Prime Minister was sacked as a partner with Slater & Gordon. Slater & Gordon says she resigned and her resignation was accepted. Peter Gordon, who Pickering says did the pushing, now works for himself. He did not return The Sun-Herald's calls.

Pickering's storyline has become grubbier and more personal. By his own admission, he uses a lot of poetic licence. He embellishes this with salacious details about Ms Gillard and Mr Wilson's relationship, and he drops some of the nations biggest names in construction and politics.

''I have used melodrama,'' Pickering tells The Sun-Herald. ''That is what gets people in and gets them interested.''

It has certainly spiked the interest of radio stalwarts Derryn Hinch, Alan Jones and Steve Price, and the columnist Andrew Bolt.

Pickering's instalments start with the likes of, ''Julia Gillard was in tears when she called Bruce Wilson …'' or ''Julia wandered aimlessly around her Abbotsford home. She had been unemployed for almost six months after being sacked from Slater & Gordon …''

Most of the mainstream media have avoided the story with the exception of The Australian, which has shown a renewed interest in the allegations. Although Ms Gillard was asked about it in a media doorstop last week, she remained composed and batted off the questions. She has not responded to questions from The Sun-Herald about Pickering's blog or whether she will take action against him.

But in Melbourne last week, Hinch broadcast an interview with Pickering discussing the latest revelations, much of them based on the work of Harry Nowicki, a retired lawyer who once worked for the former Builders Labourers Federation, and who has been researching his book on the AWU.

It has been Mr Nowicki's extensive inquiries about the AWU scandal that led him to discover another major player, the now self-confessed bent union organiser Ralph Blewitt. Mr Blewitt, who lives in Asia, has said he wants to come clean about his role in the alleged fraud with Mr Wilson, which involved scamming hundreds of thousands of dollars from building companies including Thiess Contracting, John Holland, Fluor Daniel and Woodside.

Blewitt has told The Australian he would tell all he knows about the scams, no matter who it embarrasses - if he is given indemnity from prosecution.

Mr Nowicki has also enlisted the Victorian barrister and former head of the National Crime Authority, Peter Faris, QC, and asked him to review the details of the case, and the role of Slater & Gordon. The report will be given to the Law Institute of Victoria.

Mr Nowicki has been using freedom of information to get access to the police files about the investigations into the fraud.

The documents show that West Australian police wanted to prosecute the men for the fraud but were thwarted because they could not get the company they believed to be the biggest victim, Thiess Contracting, to agree to file a police complaint.

The head of Thiess at the time was Mr Wilson's brother-in-law, Joe Trio, and the documents show that he told police he did not believe the company had been defrauded.

Mr Trio comes in for some serious allegations in Pickering's Post, but he told The Sun-Herald last week he was at the moment ignoring it as just the ravings of union thugs.

He said the allegations about his involvement were ''garbage and a load of nonsense''. When asked why he had not taken action to stop Pickering, Mr Trio said he would not rule it out.

Slater & Gordon, however, is anxious to clear its reputation and will ask the AWU to release it from client confidentiality.

Andrew Grech, Slater & Gordon's managing director, said the allegations related to matters that took place 17 to 20 years ago and were conducted by lawyers who left the firm in 1995.

''We hope that we are released from our obligations of confidentially so that we can speak freely about these matters,'' he said.

Paul Howes, the national secretary of the AWU, said he would consider that matter when asked by Slater & Gordon.

Pickering, meanwhile, is vowing to continue. He says he is being provided with the intimate details by people who want the truth to finally come out. Among them, he says, are former unionists, former employees of Mr Wilson and some members and former members of the Labor Party.

''I get a lot of people sending me stuff and calling me up.''

Pickering said he was not surprised that Ms Gillard had not taken legal action against him, but wishes she would. ''It would open a can of worms,'' he said.

However, he said his website was suffering an increasing number of cyber attacks trying to shut it down. On Friday the attacks were successful and his account was suspended.

''They may silence us for a while but the truth will out,'' Pickering says. ''Much more to come.''

http://www.smh.com.au/national/the-pm-an-old-flame-and-a-lot-of-smoke-20120818-2...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #186 - Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:21pm
 
Gist wrote on Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:08pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Aug 19th, 2012 at 4:35pm:


FACEBOOK!!???!???  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin


I think Larry Pickering has long since stopped growing tomatoes and has been secretly growing some other tall green herb. For medicinal purposes you understand. And been taking FFFAAAAAAAARRRRR too much of it in.

And it looks like lolly is his biggest sucker fan.  Grin Grin Grin

Normally I wouldnt, but it is well known now that anything is ok by the leftist using a non-independent site calling itself independent, but just a labor hack site.

But with pickering being shut down due to hacking attempts, then any media will do.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
skippy.
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 20882
Gender: male
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #187 - Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:23pm
 
The sad losers in the Liberal conga line of suckholes must be really desperate now combing through old sh it like this. Prog will no doubt post up an interview with Gillards ex girl guides leader saying she was suspended from the guides for wearing her hair in a pony tail instead of pig tails.
Back to top
 

  freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #188 - Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:27pm
 
skippy. wrote on Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:23pm:
The sad losers in the Liberal conga line of suckholes must be really desperate now combing through old sh it like this. Prog will no doubt post up an interview with Gillards ex girl guides leader saying she was suspended from the guides for wearing her hair in a pony tail instead of pig tails.

Yeh, like that has anything to do with millions of dollars and being a naive partner in a law firm. Gee, I might even try out for a partner in a law form as they come so cheaply and stupid apparently.

Better yet, we should all ask law firms not to present their partners for any work, as they are likely to be as stupid as gillard, or is that only in slater and gordon?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
skippy.
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 20882
Gender: male
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #189 - Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:31pm
 
progressiveslol wrote on Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:27pm:
skippy. wrote on Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:23pm:
The sad losers in the Liberal conga line of suckholes must be really desperate now combing through old sh it like this. Prog will no doubt post up an interview with Gillards ex girl guides leader saying she was suspended from the guides for wearing her hair in a pony tail instead of pig tails.

Yeh, like that has anything to do with millions of dollars and being a naive partner in a law firm. Gee, I might even try out for a partner in a law form as they come so cheaply and stupid apparently.

Better yet, we should all ask law firms not to present their partners for any work, as they are likely to be as stupid as gillard, or is that only in slater and gordon?

Paging bitter party OF ONE, your table awaits you.
Back to top
 

  freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #190 - Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:36pm
 
http://www.news.com.au/national/pm-julia-gillard-refuses-to-answer-allegations-s...

PM Julia Gillard refuses to answer allegations she resigned from a law firm after a union scandal

...

UPDATE: PRIME Minister Julia Gillard must address parliament about the circumstances surrounding her resignation from a prominent law firm in the face of fresh claims that she'd left under a cloud of controversy, the opposition says.

Ms Gillard has repeatedly refused to answer fresh allegations she resigned from a major law firm as a direct result of a union scandal involving her then boyfriend.

In an interview on Sky News' Australian Agenda this morning, Ms Gillard was asked on a number of occasions about the case involving her former partner and ex-Australian Workers Union official Bruce Wilson.

She confirmed she did resign in 1995 and it was her decision to do so but did not answer whether it was linked to the scandal - as claimed by a former partner of the firm at the weekend.

Ms Gillard instead said she was the victim of an online smear campaign that was not interested in the truth and said the case had no relevance to her prime ministership.

"I am not dignifying all of this scurrilous campaigning by going through these things point by point," Ms Gillard said.

"If you've got an allegation I did something wrong, then put it. I did nothing wrong. This is nonsense and a distraction from the important work I have to do as Prime Minister."

She added that she had recently given a speech to the firm and had good relations with them.

Asked again whether the resignation was a direct result of the scandal, Ms Gillard said: "I did resign from Slater & Gordon. That is a matter of public record. I made the decision to do that."
But Opposition Leader Tony Abbott says the prime minister should make a full statement to parliament about the circumstances under which she left the law firm.

"I think there are real issues that the prime minister needs to address and if she would like to make a statement to the parliament this week the coalition will gladly facilitate it," Mr Abbott said.

"Let's not forget, these issues were most recently raised in the parliament not by the coalition but by a member of her own (party), Robert McClelland."

Defence Minister Stephen Smith played down the issue.

"What does something that occurred 17 years ago with respect to a law firm she was working with that she now has an ongoing good relationship (with) have to do with the big issues of running the economy and running our national security interests?" Mr Smith said on Network Ten.

But the manager of opposition business Christopher Pyne said the issue raised very serious questions about the prime minister's integrity.

"There are serious questions that need to be answered," Mr Pyne said.

"The intensity (of this issue) has become much more dramatic."

Ms Gillard’s rebuffs comes after Nick Styant-Browne, a former equity partner of the firm, broke a 17-year silence broke his silence at the weekend to reveal Ms Gillard was interviewed about the affair in 1995.

Mr Styant-Browne said during that Ms Gillard stated in the interview that she could not categorically rule out that she had personally benefited from union funds in the renovation of her Melbourne house.

The Australian reported on Saturday that she said in the interview that she believed she had paid for all the work and materials, and had receipts, which she later produced.

Mr Styant-Browne said the company "took a very serious view" of these and other matters "and accepted her resignation".

"The firm was scrupulous to ensure these matters were both properly investigated and Ms Gillard was given every opportunity to explain her involvement," Mr Styant-Browne told The Australian.

"Ms Gillard conveyed to me that she thought she had been 'shabbily' treated after eight years of service."

The firm's probe revolved around Ms Gillard's work since mid-1992 for the Australian Workers Union and Mr Wilson as well as her direct role in establishing the AWU Workplace Reform Association for Mr Wilson.

The legal entity that Ms Gillard began to establish for Mr Wilson from mid-1992 was used by Mr Wilson and his then friend, AWU bagman and West Australian branch head Ralph Blewitt, to allegedly corruptly receive hundreds of thousands of dollars from large companies.

- with AAP
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #191 - Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:37pm
 
skippy. wrote on Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:31pm:
progressiveslol wrote on Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:27pm:
skippy. wrote on Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:23pm:
The sad losers in the Liberal conga line of suckholes must be really desperate now combing through old sh it like this. Prog will no doubt post up an interview with Gillards ex girl guides leader saying she was suspended from the guides for wearing her hair in a pony tail instead of pig tails.

Yeh, like that has anything to do with millions of dollars and being a naive partner in a law firm. Gee, I might even try out for a partner in a law form as they come so cheaply and stupid apparently.

Better yet, we should all ask law firms not to present their partners for any work, as they are likely to be as stupid as gillard, or is that only in slater and gordon?

Paging bitter party OF ONE, your table awaits you.

Where are you going?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #192 - Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:38pm
 
Mr Styant-Browne said during that Ms Gillard stated in the interview that she could not categorically rule out that she had personally benefited from union funds in the renovation of her Melbourne house.

The Australian reported on Saturday that she said in the interview that she believed she had paid for all the work and materials, and had receipts, which she later produced.

Mr Styant-Browne said the company "took a very serious view" of these and other matters "and accepted her resignation".

____________

so shes a simple crook,

charge her..shes never been elected anyway as PM

forgiven

namaste
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
progressiveslol
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17029
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #193 - Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:41pm
 
it_is_the_light wrote on Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:38pm:
Mr Styant-Browne said during that Ms Gillard stated in the interview that she could not categorically rule out that she had personally benefited from union funds in the renovation of her Melbourne house.

The Australian reported on Saturday that she said in the interview that she believed she had paid for all the work and materials, and had receipts, which she later produced.

Mr Styant-Browne said the company "took a very serious view" of these and other matters "and accepted her resignation".

____________

so shes a simple crook,

charge her..shes never been elected anyway as PM

forgiven

namaste

At the very least, all evidence should come forth, then gillard answer to us about the evidence.

Then skippy should roll around like a dog, jump up and down3 times and kiss my A
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Shane B
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1473
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Is Gillard about to be exposed
Reply #194 - Aug 19th, 2012 at 5:44pm
 
The Prime Minister must be beyond reproach.

There are serious questions and allegations concerning her conduct.

Gillard must resign.
Back to top
 

Julia Gillard - twice selected, never elected.

We're still paying for the Whitlam Government.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 ... 24
Send Topic Print