abu_rashid wrote on Jun 24^th, 2012 at 11:18pm:


A couple of things, semi-randomly:
There were Jews there a long time before any Muslims existed.
The Muslims also conquered that bit of territory and much else besides. SO don't get all huffy about a little bit of conquest off you.
You guys tried to kill off Israel a couple of times, unsuccessfully. Now they are well and truly in the majority there and the Arabs and the Muslims are the minority. How about you respect that?
Muslims are a minority everywhere in the west - but look at the demands they make wherever their numbers reach a couple of percent.
Elsewhere in the world? Muslim population of Thailand? 5 %. Phillipines? 5%. Is there bloody demand by  Muslims break-away territory? Yes. ANy other countries mired in conflict on account of their Muslim minority? yes. Palestine's jewish population in 1946? 30%. SO in a way they are not doing anything different to what Muslim have been and are doing.

You are just upset by being repaid in your own coin. And by the Jews. That's your big problem. When the Brits or the French took over large swathes of 'Muslim lands', it was no biggie by comparison. It's the Jews that you re all upset about. The jewish reconquista is contrary to what Mohammed said. Israel represents a cognitive dissonance for Muslims who cannot ever reconcile the actuality of Israel and the Koranic prophecy.

Soren wrote on Jun 25^th, 2012 at 10:13pm:


We consider them to have been Muslims. The ancient Hebrews have no more link to the modern day Jews than they do to the modern day Muslims and Arabs.

Likewise there were Canaanites, Jubusites, Philistines and all other kinds of Semitic peoples there before the Jews, most of whom today are part of the Arab/Muslim community, as are most of the Hebrew originally of Palestine as well.

Soren wrote on Jun 25^th, 2012 at 10:13pm:


Ditto for the OT account.

Soren wrote on Jun 25^th, 2012 at 10:13pm:


We did nothing of the kind. Those wars were between puppet nationalists, not between Muslims. When "Israel" has a war against the Muslims, she'll know about it, just like the Soviets & Yanks know about it.

Soren wrote on Jun 25^th, 2012 at 10:13pm:


No they are not.

Soren wrote on Jun 25^th, 2012 at 10:13pm:


Well perhaps when we emulate your beloved Zionists, and boot you out of your own home, then you'll respect us?  Seems to me that's the kind of behaviour you condone and approve of. So I say good, get ready for more. Stop your whinging, and suck it up.

Soren wrote on Jun 25^th, 2012 at 10:13pm:


Philipines was overrun by Christians. All of southern Philipines was originally part of Islamic Sultanate.

What was the population of Jews in 1900? Less than 2%.

Soren wrote on Jun 25^th, 2012 at 10:13pm:


Difference was Brits and French were just playing swashbucklers. They were there for a brief period, and so their presence was tolerated, knowing full well they weren't setting up shop there for good. The Zionist imposition was completely different, these mongrels actually got the idea they were gonna turf people out of their homes, and start squatting in them.

Again I ask you Soren, how would you react to that happening to your home? Please respond. If you can't, just admit you're a hypocritical loser and we'll move on.

Quote:


What makes you say that? Can you prove it? Without a religious text?

SOB

freediver wrote on Jun 26^th, 2012 at 12:26pm:


Im saying that just because a fairy story says the jews were in that location doesnt mean they were.

SOB

Sir Spot of Borg wrote on Jun 26^th, 2012 at 9:51am:



Judea.



Google the word.

Soren wrote on Jun 25^th, 2012 at 10:13pm:


The three southern states were Muslim sultanates for centuries before the Thais invaded only about 100 years ago.

The Thai Buddhist terrorists invaded the three muslim-majority countries. The Muslims in those countries are resisting the Thai Buddhist terrorist occupation.



Soren wrote on Jun 25^th, 2012 at 10:13pm:


Islam arrived in the Philippines peacefully about 400 years before the Christian terrorist invasion.

The British explorer William Dampier recorded that the island of Mindanao was a cosmopolitan Islamic sultanate 400 years ago, where many people were multi-lingual speaking Arabic, Malay and their local language.

Interestingly, William Dampier was amazed how the Muslim Filipinos bathed daily - something unheard of in Christian Europe at the time.

At the time that the Spanish Christian terrorists arrived in Philippines, the only organised areas of the Philippines were the sultanates of the Sulu Archipelago and the huge Island of Mindanao.

However, Islam had spread by this time into the north, with the modern capital, Manilla, deriving its name from the Arabic - Daru Emanillah (Home of the Belief in God). This was shortened by the Spanish Christian terrorists to Manila.

At the time of the Spanish Christian terrorist invasion, Manila was part of the Sulatanate of Brunei.

The Christians are invaders in the Philippines, many were forced by the Spanish to convert at the point of a sword.

falah wrote on Jun 26^th, 2012 at 1:40pm:



Yadda paraphrases......

"The Buddhists and Hindus in many Asian & S.E. Asian countries [e.g. Thailand Burma, Nepal, India] are resisting the current day moslem terrorist attempts to reoccupy lands that were [originally] not moslem lands."

[quote author=3B3C313C355D0 link=1338909288/160#160 date=1340682030

The three southern states were Muslim sultanates for centuries before the Thais invaded only about 100 years ago.

The Thai Buddhist terrorists invaded the three muslim-majority countries. The Muslims in those countries are resisting the Thai Buddhist terrorist occupation. [/quote]

Have just spent six weeks touring Thailand and Vietnam I can tell you that Buddhists were in Thai before the birth of Jesus. The Hindu religion somewhat later in the south (the areas you mention) was Hindu/Buddhist before islam was invented by your only prophet.