muso wrote on May 23
rd, 2012 at 10:54am:
... wrote on May 23
rd, 2012 at 10:47am:
With us or agains us? No - that's why I introduced the "spectrum of gayness" (patent pending).
Say for example, you unwittingly stuck it to a ladyboy. That's technically gay, but on the lower end of the spectrum of gayness (SOG). But say you knew it was a ladyboy - that's a step up. At the extreme gay end you have getting knowingly stuck by men.
OK. Let's say that somebody played around in prison but were totally straight outside?
- or at a mining camp, but all are now happily married men? (not hypothetical)
From experience, I agree with you that there is a spectrum or continuum. In my various roles I've had reports of it happening.
I kinda agree with your point about the "born gay" label. I've always thought it was a bit of nurture as well as nature.
I don't think theres any one cause. We know that exposure to some chemicals can "feminise" males or masculinise females.
Quote:Curtin University research has established that female marine snails living off the Perth coast are growing male sex organs after exposure to the chemical TBT
http://www.sciencealert.com.au/news/20101309-21316.htmland we know that child abuse victims identify as gay at a much higher rate than non-abused peers. The correlation is too strong too ignore as a possible cause.
Quote:Gay, lesbian and bisexual youth may be at greater risk because they tend to be socially isolated and are easier targets.14,15 In one study, male sexual abuse survivors self-described as homosexual almost seven times, and as bisexual almost six times, more often than nonabused peers.15
http://www.advocatesforyouth.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=410&I...The gayness of your examples will be contingent upon a few factors - did they give it or take it? What were they thinking of, or looking at? did they close their eyes and think of a supermodel? did their partner look like a chick or a big hairy stinky male? The SOG is very complex.