Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 
Send Topic Print
For the Leftists: Godwin Explained. (Read 10169 times)
Amadd
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mo

Posts: 6217
Re: For the Leftists: Godwin Explained.
Reply #90 - May 22nd, 2012 at 10:01am
 
Quote:
A court has ordered a husband to pay his ex-wife $6000 a week to maintain her lavish lifestyle including a $500 hair and clothes budget and $1000 for entertainment.

The Family Court heard the wife, who is in her 50s, had suffered a "drastic change" in her financial position since the couple's 11-year marriage broke up several years ago.

Justice Christine Dawe ruled the allowance be granted until the couple, who are in their 50s, can agree on a settlement of their estimated $80 million estate, PerthNow reports.

The wife had originally asked for $9000 per week, as well as $2 million for their son's expenses including $440,000 on holidays.

She outlined her lavish expense budget including $1200 for food, $1100 for clothes, $770 for hairdressing and $1200 for household supplies.

The court heard the husband opposed the payments as "manifestly excessive and unjustified" and that the wife had been given $19 million in partial settlements since they separated.

Justice Dawe dismissed the husband's claims the payments were "excessive" and said some of the amounts were "necessary and reasonable".

The husband's own expenses were submitted to the court as $33,000 a week, including looking after his son.


...Gee those ladies sure know the meaning of tough.. Grin

Let me take them down, starting with my stupid upstart sister, then next my pathetic ungrateful mum, both of whom which I have absolutely no respect at all.


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Amadd
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mo

Posts: 6217
Re: For the Leftists: Godwin Explained.
Reply #91 - May 22nd, 2012 at 10:11am
 
It's war against them now.
It's war against the dumbass Christian, it's war against the feminist, it's war against the muslim.
As a democratic free thinking individual, I now side with the logical Chinese thankyou very much  Smiley


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Amadd
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mo

Posts: 6217
Re: For the Leftists: Godwin Explained.
Reply #92 - May 22nd, 2012 at 10:15am
 
Anyway, I'm going to buy some shares 'cause all you idiots take no note of value.

See you again when I'm rich OK?  Grin

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frances
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3577
In a Castle in the Hills
Gender: female
Re: For the Leftists: Godwin Explained.
Reply #93 - May 22nd, 2012 at 10:25am
 
Amadd wrote on May 22nd, 2012 at 10:01am:
Let me take them down, starting with my stupid upstart sister, then next my pathetic ungrateful mum, both of whom which I have absolutely no respect at all.


That sounds a bit harsh.  Do you have respect for any women at all?
Back to top
 

Sure God created man before woman. But then you always make a rough draft before the final masterpiece.
 
IP Logged
 
Amadd
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Mo

Posts: 6217
Re: For the Leftists: Godwin Explained.
Reply #94 - May 22nd, 2012 at 11:25am
 
Yes I do, just not the ones that I know personally.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26588
Australia
Re: For the Leftists: Godwin Explained.
Reply #95 - May 22nd, 2012 at 11:44am
 
Amadd wrote on May 22nd, 2012 at 10:15am:
Anyway, I'm going to buy some shares 'cause all you idiots take no note of value.

See you again when I'm rich OK?  Grin



Buy facebook shares. They are "down" atm.

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10300
Gender: male
Re: For the Leftists: Godwin Explained.
Reply #96 - May 22nd, 2012 at 12:18pm
 
double post.
Back to top
« Last Edit: May 22nd, 2012 at 12:37pm by Postmodern Trendoid III »  
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10300
Gender: male
Re: For the Leftists: Godwin Explained.
Reply #97 - May 22nd, 2012 at 12:37pm
 
nairbe wrote on May 22nd, 2012 at 7:13am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 9:26pm:
nairbe wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 9:00pm:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 8:07pm:

Quote:
nairbe wrote

Now you are bringing up the Nazi's to justify your argument.  Grin Grin Grin Grin



The topic is about Godwin's law. You were trying to claim that the Iraq invasion was similar to what the Nazis did. I simply pointed out that that was not the case.


OH i see, so you revert back to the basis of the discussion when the development of the topic moves to a place where you have no answers. I made it very clear on two levels;

1. I do not see our current political leadership as Nazi's i see them as Greedists.

2. The issue at the coure of mentioning the Nazi's is not a reference to death camps and book burnings but rather to societal ignorance to what is happening around them.



There would be lots of countries that are full of people who are ignorant of many things, so your Nazi analogy here is very weak to say the least. And the examples you used of peasants and killings were proven false anyway.


As we have clearly already over reached your intellectual ability to analyse information and made deductions base on probability and known fact we shall leave it there. You have failed to answer questions posed to you and now are denying the innocent that died in Iraq as a result of what was proven to be an out right lie and fabrication by the Uass over Weapons of Mass Deception. I pity people like yourself who are happy to be kicked in the guts, so long as the oppressor is of your choosing.


My intellectual ability is fine thank you very much.

Let us go back over what is the issue here before you create more Red Herrings.


You stated this on page 4:
Quote:
I agree that the Hitler comparison is used too often with now no effect. I would also assert that most don't understand what actually happened back then. Hitler was by no means the monster that gas jews and did medical experiments until later in his time, he was at first hailed an economic genius that gave his poverty stricken nation work, food and hope. He restored self respect for the German people after the humiliation of the post WW1 era. At that time the only signs of the monster was his discrimination socially against jews and gays and ethnic Germans in general. This was not seen as a problem around the world as most countries considered the jews a major problem at that time even the US. The warning in the Hitler comparison is to the ignorance of the people who didn't see the monster creep up on them and the lesson that once the monster has control it is to late to turn back.


You distance yourself from direct Hitler comparisons, but maintain that many are ignorant of major problems and this makes the leaders (Liberals I presume for your position) is still linked to "being like Hitler;" that a Hitler like character is creeping up on us here.


Then you reiterate it again on page 6:
Quote:
The issue at the coure of mentioning the Nazi's is not a reference to death camps and book burnings but rather to societal ignorance to what is happening around them.


It is a very weak link to claim those who ignorant of things are going to be duped by a Hitler clone. People are ignorant of all sorts of things. Does this make leaders just like Hitler?

You then use two examples of this "creeping" Hitlerism.
That Australians are now peasants, and the Iraq invasion.

The first one is rubbish. Australians have had, and still do, possess a very high standard of living compared to most countries. (Funnily enough, when Hitler came to power he raised the standards of living for most Germans, so your comparison bums out in two respects here).

The second was, I admit, based on lies. But, politicians lie frequently, so your Labor buddies here too would be "creeping Hitlers." Additionally, the end result in Iraq was supposed to be not a fascist military state, but a liberal democracy. Two very different political doctrines.


The problem here is your vain attempt to, no matter what, link your political opponents to Hitler in some way or another. In doing so you over look empirical evidence that goes against your position. Like all ideologues, you are blinded by your emotional attachment to your beliefs. But, by all means, keep pumping out the false analogies, and I'll be there to show you the contradictions and inconsistencies in your positions.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
JC Denton
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 5518
Gender: female
Re: For the Leftists: Godwin Explained.
Reply #98 - May 22nd, 2012 at 12:38pm
 
dont bother with nairbe

this is the loony who thought the expression 'juliar' was a clandestine anti-semitic slur

he/she is prob some hysterical jew
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10300
Gender: male
Re: For the Leftists: Godwin Explained.
Reply #99 - May 22nd, 2012 at 12:41pm
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 22nd, 2012 at 7:24am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 8:08pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 8:03pm:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 8:00pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 7:42pm:
Quote:
The Iraq situation was to remove Hussien and install and Western style liberal democracy. Although this was never achieved, it is still a far cry from what the Nazis did.


Its invading someone else and installing your own regime. Forcing your own beliefs on others. Collectively. Same thing.

SOB


Liberal democracies tolerate multiple viewpoints and allow people to vote, dictatorships do not.

All regimes are not the same.


I didnt say all regimes were the same. I said imposing your regime on someone else is the same thing they were trying to do.

SOB


But there's a world of difference between a liberal democracy and the National Socialist German Workers Party, yes?


Its irrelevant to my point.

SOB



I could ask you what your point was, but going on previous experiences you have a tendency to reinterpret the context of your positions after the fact.

You've proven yourself to be a waste of my time.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10300
Gender: male
Re: For the Leftists: Godwin Explained.
Reply #100 - May 22nd, 2012 at 12:46pm
 
JC Denton wrote on May 22nd, 2012 at 12:38pm:
dont bother with nairbe

this is the loony who thought the expression 'juliar' was a clandestine anti-semitic slur

he/she is prob some hysterical jew


Lol. He does draw long bows.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26588
Australia
Re: For the Leftists: Godwin Explained.
Reply #101 - May 22nd, 2012 at 12:50pm
 
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on May 22nd, 2012 at 12:41pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 22nd, 2012 at 7:24am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 8:08pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 8:03pm:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 8:00pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 7:42pm:
Quote:
The Iraq situation was to remove Hussien and install and Western style liberal democracy. Although this was never achieved, it is still a far cry from what the Nazis did.


Its invading someone else and installing your own regime. Forcing your own beliefs on others. Collectively. Same thing.

SOB


Liberal democracies tolerate multiple viewpoints and allow people to vote, dictatorships do not.

All regimes are not the same.


I didnt say all regimes were the same. I said imposing your regime on someone else is the same thing they were trying to do.

SOB


But there's a world of difference between a liberal democracy and the National Socialist German Workers Party, yes?


Its irrelevant to my point.

SOB



I could ask you what your point was, but going on previous experiences you have a tendency to reinterpret the context of your positions after the fact.

You've proven yourself to be a waste of my time.


Are you serious? You dont get what I am saying? lol and you reckon you are so smart and you said "there is nothing you understand that I do not". Yes you said that.

Here is what I said again (read it slowly)

Quote:
Its invading someone else and installing your own regime. Forcing your own beliefs on others. Collectively. Same thing.


Okay now what is the action. Invading and installing your own regime. Again the action: forcing your own beliefs on others. Action. Its an action.

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Postmodern Trendoid III
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 10300
Gender: male
Re: For the Leftists: Godwin Explained.
Reply #102 - May 22nd, 2012 at 12:53pm
 
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 22nd, 2012 at 12:50pm:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on May 22nd, 2012 at 12:41pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 22nd, 2012 at 7:24am:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 8:08pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 8:03pm:
Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 8:00pm:
Sir Spot of Borg wrote on May 21st, 2012 at 7:42pm:
Quote:
The Iraq situation was to remove Hussien and install and Western style liberal democracy. Although this was never achieved, it is still a far cry from what the Nazis did.


Its invading someone else and installing your own regime. Forcing your own beliefs on others. Collectively. Same thing.

SOB


Liberal democracies tolerate multiple viewpoints and allow people to vote, dictatorships do not.

All regimes are not the same.


I didnt say all regimes were the same. I said imposing your regime on someone else is the same thing they were trying to do.

SOB


But there's a world of difference between a liberal democracy and the National Socialist German Workers Party, yes?


Its irrelevant to my point.

SOB



I could ask you what your point was, but going on previous experiences you have a tendency to reinterpret the context of your positions after the fact.

You've proven yourself to be a waste of my time.


Are you serious? You dont get what I am saying? lol and you reckon you are so smart and you said "there is nothing you understand that I do not". Yes you said that.

Here is what I said again (read it slowly)

Quote:
Its invading someone else and installing your own regime. Forcing your own beliefs on others. Collectively. Same thing.


Okay now what is the action. Invading and installing your own regime. Again the action: forcing your own beliefs on others. Action. Its an action.

SOB


Huh?

So what is the topic here for you, installing a regime or the noun 'action'?

And what does it have to do with the opening post?


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
...
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male
Re: For the Leftists: Godwin Explained.
Reply #103 - May 22nd, 2012 at 1:05pm
 
Quote:
you said "there is nothing you understand that I do not". Yes you said that.



Actually, that was me.
Back to top
 

In the fullness of time...
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Spot of Borg
Gold Member
*****
Offline


WE ARE BORG

Posts: 26588
Australia
Re: For the Leftists: Godwin Explained.
Reply #104 - May 22nd, 2012 at 1:08pm
 
... wrote on May 22nd, 2012 at 1:05pm:
Quote:
you said "there is nothing you understand that I do not". Yes you said that.



Actually, that was me. 


You are right. I mistook mist for you. Are you the same?

SOB
Back to top
 

Whaaaaaah!
I'm a 
Moron!
- edited by some unethical admin - you think its funny? - its a slippery slope
WWW PoliticsAneReligion  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 
Send Topic Print