Australian Politics Forum - BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #75 - May 30^th, 2012 at 6:47pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:42pm:

I have no recommendation.

I'll leave that up to the people who actually want that insurance policy.

I'm happy to go with the flow.

Lol, I PRONOUNCE THIS EXACT POST GOLD!

Excellent.

I suppose you're not used to seeing such open-mindedness and honesty. That's not really something the AGW disciples practice.

Anyway, I'm glad you liked it.

So, what's your recommendation?

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #76 - May 30^th, 2012 at 6:50pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:47pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:42pm:

I have no recommendation.

I'll leave that up to the people who actually want that insurance policy.

I'm happy to go with the flow.

Lol, I PRONOUNCE THIS EXACT POST GOLD!

Excellent.

I suppose you're not used to seeing such open-mindedness and honesty. That's not really something the AGW disciples practice.

Anyway, I'm glad you liked it.

So, what's your recommendation?

To listen to the scientists!!
Wink

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #77 - May 30^th, 2012 at 6:53pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:50pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:47pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:42pm:

I have no recommendation.

I'll leave that up to the people who actually want that insurance policy.

I'm happy to go with the flow.

Lol, I PRONOUNCE THIS EXACT POST GOLD!

Excellent.

I suppose you're not used to seeing such open-mindedness and honesty. That's not really something the AGW disciples practice.

Anyway, I'm glad you liked it.

So, what's your recommendation?

To listen to the scientists!!
Wink

Same answer as me. Good.

"I'll leave that up to the people who actually want that insurance policy."

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #78 - May 30^th, 2012 at 7:03pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:53pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:50pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:47pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:42pm:

I have no recommendation.

I'll leave that up to the people who actually want that insurance policy.

I'm happy to go with the flow.

Lol, I PRONOUNCE THIS EXACT POST GOLD!

Excellent.

I suppose you're not used to seeing such open-mindedness and honesty. That's not really something the AGW disciples practice.

Anyway, I'm glad you liked it.

So, what's your recommendation?

To listen to the scientists!!
Wink

Same answer as me. Good.

"I'll leave that up to the people who actually want that insurance policy."

So, your answer is, "to listen to the scientists", is it?

Cheesy

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #79 - May 30^th, 2012 at 8:37pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 7:03pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:53pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:50pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:47pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:42pm:

I have no recommendation.

I'll leave that up to the people who actually want that insurance policy.

I'm happy to go with the flow.

Lol, I PRONOUNCE THIS EXACT POST GOLD!

Excellent.

I suppose you're not used to seeing such open-mindedness and honesty. That's not really something the AGW disciples practice.

Anyway, I'm glad you liked it.

So, what's your recommendation?

To listen to the scientists!!
Wink

Same answer as me. Good.

"I'll leave that up to the people who actually want that insurance policy."

So, your answer is, "to listen to the scientists", is it?

Cheesy

In relation to the question you asked me, and I asked you, yes.

You seem to have trouble keeping up with the conversation.

The question you asked me:

"Oh, so what kind of emissions cut would you recommend then?"

My answer:

"I have no recommendation.

I'll leave that up to the people who actually want that insurance policy.

I'm happy to go with the flow."

My question to you:

"So, what's your recommendation?" (still on the subject of cutting emissions).

Your answer:

"To listen to the scientists!!"

What part can't you follow?

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened Reply #80 - May 31^st, 2012 at 3:45pm bUT UNCLE MEAT: YOU AREN'T LISTENING TO THE SCIENTISTS!
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

Uncle Meat Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2434 Tasmania Gender:	Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened Reply #81 - May 31^st, 2012 at 3:51pm BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 31^st, 2012 at 3:45pm: bUT UNCLE MEAT: YOU AREN'T LISTENING TO THE SCIENTISTS! I'm listening to them.
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #82 - May 31^st, 2012 at 4:12pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 31^st, 2012 at 3:51pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 31^st, 2012 at 3:45pm:

bUT UNCLE MEAT: YOU AREN'T LISTENING TO THE SCIENTISTS! Cheesy

I'm listening to them.

Lol, 'listening' in italics = GOLD!! Grin

SEE, we all know you're a time-wasting bean counter.

Time is money and all that hey buddy!

Lol, counting demands so much concentration: lol, ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh look at the exponential relationship go!

Embarrassed

1 + 1.1 + 1.11 + 1.111 + 1.1111

....

Lol, JUST SO LOL!!! Kiss

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #83 - May 31^st, 2012 at 5:42pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 31^st, 2012 at 4:12pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 31^st, 2012 at 3:51pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 31^st, 2012 at 3:45pm:

bUT UNCLE MEAT: YOU AREN'T LISTENING TO THE SCIENTISTS! Cheesy

I'm listening to them.

Lol, 'listening' in italics = GOLD!! Grin

SEE, we all know you're a time-wasting bean counter.

Time is money and all that hey buddy!

Lol, counting demands so much concentration: lol, ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh look at the exponential relationship go!

Embarrassed

1 + 1.1 + 1.11 + 1.111 + 1.1111

....

Lol, JUST SO LOL!!! Kiss

Nope, not a bean counter. Not sure where you got that from.

Back to top

IP Logged