Australian Politics Forum - BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #60 - May 30^th, 2012 at 5:23pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 3:00pm:

MOTR wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 1:39am:

Here's the problem, Uncle Meat, if the hypothesis is correct, which is highly likely, we're not acting fast enough. Educating people about a highly likely adverse outcome is not fear mongering.

Speculation.

Stop the fear mongering.

Uncle Meat is putting his hand down the pants of the unborn again!

HERE'S HOPING THEY DON'T PUNISH YOUR GRANDKIDS!!

(PEOPLE DO THAT SORT OF STUFF YA KNOW!! Wink

)

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #61 - May 30^th, 2012 at 5:55pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 5:23pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 3:00pm:

MOTR wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 1:39am:

Here's the problem, Uncle Meat, if the hypothesis is correct, which is highly likely, we're not acting fast enough. Educating people about a highly likely adverse outcome is not fear mongering.

Speculation.

Stop the fear mongering.

Uncle Meat is putting his hand down the pants of the unborn again!

http://www.hyscience.com/archives/jumpers2.jpeg

HERE'S HOPING THEY DON'T PUNISH YOUR GRANDKIDS!!

(PEOPLE DO THAT SORT OF STUFF YA KNOW!! Wink

)

Yep, I'm single-handedly destroying the planet.

Because of my scepticism of the AGW hypothesis the entire human race will be wiped out in the next few decades.

We're all doomed, and our grandchildren won't live to see their teenage years, all because I decided to question the "science" behind AGW (all the while remaining open-minded).

Even though I have consistently said that I have no objection to carbon reduction schemes (as an insurance policy) my willingness to consider other reasons for climate change, and not blindly accept AGW as the only possibility, means that my grandchildren and all other inhabitants of this planet are destined to die in the very near future.

I didn't realise I was so powerful Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #62 - May 30^th, 2012 at 6:01pm

Uncle Meat is a liar: he thinks he is a skeptic of the science yet he doesn't deny it's possible!

So, UNCLE MEAT OLD LIAR: Why would a 5% cut in emissions make sense but not more?

WE ALL KNOW YOU WON'T OPEN YOURSELF UP TO EXAMINATION BY ANSWERING QUESTIONS LIKE THAT OLD LIAR!!

All the same, sleep well.... Kiss

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Uncle Meat Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2434 Tasmania Gender:	Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened Reply #63 - May 30^th, 2012 at 6:03pm BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:01pm: Uncle Meat is a liar: he thinks he is a skeptic of the science yet he doesn't deny it's possible! Still haven't bought yourself a dictionary, have you?
Back to top	IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened Reply #64 - May 30^th, 2012 at 6:04pm
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #65 - May 30^th, 2012 at 6:05pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:03pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:01pm:

Uncle Meat is a liar: he thinks he is a skeptic of the science yet he doesn't deny it's possible!

Still haven't bought yourself a dictionary, have you?

Dood, you're being very evasive!!

Cheesy

Am I too skilled to be taken lightly am I!!! Grin

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #66 - May 30^th, 2012 at 6:06pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:01pm:

So, UNCLE MEAT OLD LIAR: Why would a 5% cut in emissions make sense but not more?

WE ALL KNOW YOU WON'T OPEN YOURSELF UP TO EXAMINATION BY ANSWERING QUESTIONS LIKE THAT OLD LIAR!!

I've never said that a 5% cut in emissions would make sense but not more.

So, is there any particular reason why you would ask me that question? Undecided

Back to top

IP Logged

nairbe Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2587 Rural NSW Gender:	Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened Reply #67 - May 30^th, 2012 at 6:06pm BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:01pm: [color=#ff0000]Uncle Meat is a liar: he thinks he is a skeptic of the science yet he doesn't deny it's possible! Wouldn't that just make him an agnostic.
Back to top	"Faced with what is right, to leave it undone shows a lack of courage." Confucius IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #68 - May 30^th, 2012 at 6:10pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:06pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:01pm:

So, UNCLE MEAT OLD LIAR: Why would a 5% cut in emissions make sense but not more?

WE ALL KNOW YOU WON'T OPEN YOURSELF UP TO EXAMINATION BY ANSWERING QUESTIONS LIKE THAT OLD LIAR!!

I've never said that a 5% cut in emissions would make sense but not more.

So, is there any particular reason why you would ask me that question? Undecided

Oh, so what kind of emissions cut would you recommend then?

(-->>More than 5%, obviously, I presume?? Cheesy

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #69 - May 30^th, 2012 at 6:10pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:05pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:03pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:01pm:

Uncle Meat is a liar: he thinks he is a skeptic of the science yet he doesn't deny it's possible!

Still haven't bought yourself a dictionary, have you?

Dood, you're being very evasive!!

No, I'm not.

One can be sceptical of the AGW hypothesis without denying that it's possible.

What part of that don't you understand?

You do know what "sceptical" means, don't you?

Don't confuse "deny" with "doubt".

Back to top

IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #70 - May 30^th, 2012 at 6:12pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:10pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:06pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:01pm:

So, UNCLE MEAT OLD LIAR: Why would a 5% cut in emissions make sense but not more?

WE ALL KNOW YOU WON'T OPEN YOURSELF UP TO EXAMINATION BY ANSWERING QUESTIONS LIKE THAT OLD LIAR!!

I've never said that a 5% cut in emissions would make sense but not more.

So, is there any particular reason why you would ask me that question? Undecided

Oh, so what kind of emissions cut would you recommend then?

(-->>More than 5%, obviously, I presume?? Cheesy

I have no recommendation.

I'll leave that up to the people who actually want that insurance policy.

I'm happy to go with the flow.

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #71 - May 30^th, 2012 at 6:13pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:05pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:03pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:01pm:

Uncle Meat is a liar: he thinks he is a skeptic of the science yet he doesn't deny it's possible!

Still haven't bought yourself a dictionary, have you?

Dood, you're being very evasive!!

No, I'm not.

One can be sceptical of the AGW hypothesis without denying that it's possible.

What part of that don't you understand?

You do know what "sceptical" means, don't you?

Don't confuse "deny" with "doubt".

Why would I take english lesson off a bloke who doesn't understand the meaning of the word 'evasive' ????? Kiss

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Uncle Meat

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2434
Tasmania
Gender: male

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #72 - May 30^th, 2012 at 6:35pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:13pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:10pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:05pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:03pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:01pm:

Uncle Meat is a liar: he thinks he is a skeptic of the science yet he doesn't deny it's possible!

Still haven't bought yourself a dictionary, have you?

Dood, you're being very evasive!!

No, I'm not.

One can be sceptical of the AGW hypothesis without denying that it's possible.

What part of that don't you understand?

You do know what "sceptical" means, don't you?

Don't confuse "deny" with "doubt".

Why would I take english lesson off a bloke who doesn't understand the meaning of the word 'evasive' ????? Kiss

1. You don't understand the meaning of the word "sceptical".

2 I'm not being evasive.

That's why.

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #73 - May 30^th, 2012 at 6:42pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:12pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:10pm:

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:06pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:01pm:

So, UNCLE MEAT OLD LIAR: Why would a 5% cut in emissions make sense but not more?

WE ALL KNOW YOU WON'T OPEN YOURSELF UP TO EXAMINATION BY ANSWERING QUESTIONS LIKE THAT OLD LIAR!!

I've never said that a 5% cut in emissions would make sense but not more.

So, is there any particular reason why you would ask me that question? Undecided

Oh, so what kind of emissions cut would you recommend then?

(-->>More than 5%, obviously, I presume?? Cheesy

I have no recommendation.

I'll leave that up to the people who actually want that insurance policy.

I'm happy to go with the flow.

Lol, I PRONOUNCE THIS EXACT POST GOLD!

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: BS BS BS. Climate scientists were not threatened
Reply #74 - May 30^th, 2012 at 6:44pm

Uncle Meat wrote on May 30^th, 2012 at 6:35pm:

Why would I take english lesson off a bloke who doesn't understand the meaning of the word 'evasive' ????? Kiss

1. You don't understand the meaning of the word "sceptical".

2 I'm not being evasive.

That's why. [/quote]

Anyone reading this dribble would not be scorned for lifting this word for word as an example of SMALL TARGET STRATEGY BY UNCLE MEAT!!

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged