So then. Let's look at in a more pragmatic POV.

Feminists are essentially "Dog Shares".

They pay no dividend, they have little essential worth, they accrue massive debt, they drop in price by the day.

Why would one invest in such a share?

Where is the worth to invest in?

You'd better have something frikin' great to compromise and extend your value, otherwise you remain a "DOGSHARE".

Nothing forces us to buy the dog shares though, and they're only worth what someones prepared to pay.  They might be able to hector some hapless omega schmuck into a lifetime of servitude, but who gives a bugger about them?  They're the ones paying the price for their lack of cojones.   
Sad that the vicious ideologues have co-opted the state, the media and the academy to push their abominable vision of a sexless society as a utopia to aspire to though.  Not everyone has the clarity and/or the backbone to stand tall in the face of the ideological assault from all angles, so I lament that so many innocents are being dragged down by the haters.  Still, I didn't start the war, I don't want a war - the collateral damage is on the hands of the femos.

Nope Mantra, I am talking pure economics.

The quest to divorce hard working men in order to buy more shoes will probably not advance our economy in a meaningful way...me thinks 

That's where I get the term "Dogshare".

By your definition of "BITCHSHARES", I see them as  being very marketable.
Put them up, they will sell.

Amadd wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 12:34pm:


I've met a lot of working women who are the sole breadwinners for their family. In some areas it's quite acceptable for the overweight lazy male to sit at home doing whatever he pleases while his middle aged work worn wife slaves in some nasty supermarket for long hours.

The same applies to younger women who ask for very little from their partners knowing it would be futile anyway.

I don't think BITCHSHARES are that marketable and would only ever attract a low price. Perhaps in the future when sperm donors are in short supply - you could make a few bucks?

Frances wrote on May 24^th, 2012 at 2:24pm:



Yes there are many combinations. There are no "absolute norms" IMO, but when there is forcefulness in motion to go beyond what is considered (felt as) "normal", by the "plebs" (for want of a better word), there is also a danger of destruction.

You can get my intention wrong if you like, ..that I hate women and that I am a mysogonist. or whatever you want to call it.
It's not the case at all. I love the naturalness of women..What male would want to lose it?

But I fear that we men are losing it, in the name of greed, ..even moreso in the name of power.

I think that there are many women (such as Mantra) who have the nouse to alter the path that we are on, but I'm losing faith that there will enough to change this course of "Capitalism without a clue".

IMO, it's not a trade off game like so many stupid men keep playing. It's a reliance on women to be themselves. Otherwise we are all stuffed.

.. And don't get me wrong, I am not subservient. I will go offshore to seek a better way....better than the capitalist server "Gina" anyway.

Good points Spot of Borg.
Seems that its a catch 22 in that many women are expected to work for an income as well as come home and do the family duties for the kids.
Sometimes while hubby sucks his baby-bottle VB and watches the Footy or whatever on the Net.
Why?
Is it that Australians sacrifice so much to live the 'lifestyle' and the expectation of keeping up with Technology, let alone the Joneses??
We are a wealthy nation - but is it by 'default' because of
1. We don't have as many children as other nations, in fact - if it wasn't for Boat People and New Zealanders our population wouldn't grow into the (+) positive and slip back into recession?
2. Our women are forced to work hard and become achievers and not breeders to keep the 'unemployment' statistic down??
3. The question beckons - are working mums 'better' for the kids: that is - which is better: the attention of a mother's love or a playstation while she's away??

Socially and culturally you can tell the difference between Aust and NZ. In NZ the kids are many, they are happy and don't need drugs or alcohol to 'get together'. Seems Aust is pro-Aged and NZ is pro-Youth. Simple as that and that is why most Aussie women are 'career' orientated and why the hell not.
Not every guy wants to hang out with Eve, Lilith can be just as much fun.