Ex Dame Pansi wrote on Apr 20
th, 2012 at 2:38pm:
They shouldn't call themselves democratic then.
Yep, that's one of the arguments.
•It is undemocratic to force people to vote – an infringement of liberty
•The ill informed and those with little interest in politics are forced to the polls
•It may increase the number of "donkey votes"
•It may increase the number of informal votes
•It increases the number of safe, single-member electorates – political parties then concentrate on the more marginal electorates
•Resources must be allocated to determine whether those who failed to vote have "valid and sufficient" reasons.
This is the one that concerns me the most:
"
The ill informed and those with little interest in politics are forced to the polls".
The amount of ignorance one encounters in the line on polling day is staggering. Some of the things I've heard people say are just crazy. Some of those people really shouldn't be voting.
However, the arguments used in favour of compulsory voting are:
•Voting is a civic duty comparable to other duties citizens perform e.g. taxation, compulsory education, jury duty
•Teaches the benefits of political participation
•Parliament reflects more accurately the "will of the electorate"
•Governments must consider the total electorate in policy formulation and management
•Candidates can concentrate their campaigning energies on issues rather than encouraging voters to attend the poll
•The voter isn't actually compelled to vote for anyone because voting is by secret ballot.
It doesn't really bother me one way or the other. I'd still vote if it wasn't compulsory.
Maybe we should have a vote on it.