Australian Politics Forum - Explicit Pictures

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #60 - May 3^rd, 2012 at 3:56pm

Dsmithy70 wrote on Feb 24^th, 2012 at 10:16pm:

Emma wrote on Feb 24^th, 2012 at 9:23pm:

Dsmithy70 wrote on Feb 24^th, 2012 at 8:09pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2012 at 8:10pm:

We discuss all sorts of 'mature' concepts here. I don't want to limit that. I think young people can handle that. Discussing war while glossing over the violence aspect is not really discussing it at all.

Would you be equally opposed to a graphic description of what goes on in war?

No one comes to this site from a search for anything a young kid would type.Censorship on the "Off Chance" is already rampant in the R/W.

Any pictures that are relvent to the discussion should be allowed.
War is Hell.

I think you missed AA's point.

Bu then again,, if you'd explain the context to me, and brief description of the 'acceptable' images I'd be better able to give YOUR point proper consideration.

No I saw Annie's post and yes fair warning would be nice but as suggested impractical.

Those sort of images, women and children mutilated would be understandable in a discussion regarding the middle east be it on Israel/Terrorism.....well just about anything over there related to politics or religion.
Let's be honest, those very sort of images are used as propaganda by just about all sides except the yanks.

perceptions_now wrote on Feb 24^th, 2012 at 9:21pm:

Photos showing people having their head cut off by a large sword, with blood spurting in all directions, which is one I recently deleted, or something similar obnoxious in sexual overtones, will be deleted, if I see them!

Glad I missed it, cant see any thread that would require that in Politics or general/chat.
Saudi Arabian justice maybe or Japanese war crimes but haven't seen them.
Sexual/Rape images never have a seat at the table, the guilty should get an immediate holiday.

perceptions_now wrote on Feb 24^th, 2012 at 9:21pm:

if I remain an Administrator!

I don't know why that would even be up for discussion.
Your doing a great job

I can give credit for PN bothering to explain his position on things!

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

bobbythefap1

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #61 - May 3^rd, 2012 at 3:57pm

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 3:53pm:

Emma wrote on Feb 24^th, 2012 at 9:09pm:

Happily I wasn't lurking around where these images/since deleted . .. appeared.

I tend to agree with AA. If truly disturbing images are to be posted, in a relevant context. a fair thing would be the consideration of a warning beforehand.!

I won't speak for anyone else on this - just myself.

If the pictures are of butchered and mangled women and children... ...I can only assume one of the male supremacist types posted them. To score some point puerile point. no doubt.!!
SHAME ON YOU.

I don't need to see such things FROM YOU.. U R sole. whichever one of the suspects! Angry

you are.
I say to the mods/ Perc. now. if you consider this was ( 'cos I didn't see it) beyond the pale.. ban for a period of time. This sort of useage for shock value is almost an assault.!

So IM GLAD I MISSED IT.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Very glad.

So, how should the war against the war economy be fought then?

The economy is not powerful if we choose not to use it.

Back to top

A day without sunshine is like night.

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #62 - May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:06pm

Frances wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 2:35pm:

Surely this is going a bit too far. I don't know if the image is photoshopped or not, mainly because I didn't want to look very closely at it:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1335950759

You gotta wake up princess!!

Wink

Stop profiting sexually from terror before you expect dignity!!! Embarrassed

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged

Frances Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 3577 In a Castle in the Hills Gender:	Re: Explicit Pictures Reply #63 - May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:15pm BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:06pm: You gotta wake up princess!! Stop profiting sexually from terror before you expect dignity!!! And how exactly am I profiting sexually from terror?
Back to top	« Last Edit: May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:57pm by Frances » Sure God created man before woman. But then you always make a rough draft before the final masterpiece. IP Logged

borntorule Full Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 135 Gender:	Re: Explicit Pictures Reply #64 - May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:39pm http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1335867472 the pictures on the last post here are offensive. Exactly what standards are there for photos if this is permissible. The same person also posted WTC photos of people jumping out. Surely, this is not acceptable particularly on a politics board.
Back to top	IP Logged

FriYAY

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 7395

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #65 - May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:41pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 3:57pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 3:53pm:

Emma wrote on Feb 24^th, 2012 at 9:09pm:

Happily I wasn't lurking around where these images/since deleted . .. appeared.

I tend to agree with AA. If truly disturbing images are to be posted, in a relevant context. a fair thing would be the consideration of a warning beforehand.!

I won't speak for anyone else on this - just myself.

If the pictures are of butchered and mangled women and children... ...I can only assume one of the male supremacist types posted them. To score some point puerile point. no doubt.!!
SHAME ON YOU.

I don't need to see such things FROM YOU.. U R sole. whichever one of the suspects! Angry

you are.
I say to the mods/ Perc. now. if you consider this was ( 'cos I didn't see it) beyond the pale.. ban for a period of time. This sort of useage for shock value is almost an assault.!

So IM GLAD I MISSED IT.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Very glad.

So, how should the war against the war economy be fought then?

The economy is not powerful if we choose not to use it.

How does one choose not to use the economy?

Do you not use the economy?

Back to top

IP Logged

bobbythefap1

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #66 - May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:42pm

FriYAY wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:41pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 3:57pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 3:53pm:

Emma wrote on Feb 24^th, 2012 at 9:09pm:

Happily I wasn't lurking around where these images/since deleted . .. appeared.

I tend to agree with AA. If truly disturbing images are to be posted, in a relevant context. a fair thing would be the consideration of a warning beforehand.!

I won't speak for anyone else on this - just myself.

If the pictures are of butchered and mangled women and children... ...I can only assume one of the male supremacist types posted them. To score some point puerile point. no doubt.!!
SHAME ON YOU.

I don't need to see such things FROM YOU.. U R sole. whichever one of the suspects! Angry

you are.
I say to the mods/ Perc. now. if you consider this was ( 'cos I didn't see it) beyond the pale.. ban for a period of time. This sort of useage for shock value is almost an assault.!

So IM GLAD I MISSED IT.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Very glad.

So, how should the war against the war economy be fought then?

The economy is not powerful if we choose not to use it.

How does one choose not to use the economy?

Do you not use the economy?

keyword 'we'

Back to top

A day without sunshine is like night.

IP Logged

borntorule

Full Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 135
Gender: male

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #67 - May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:43pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:42pm:

FriYAY wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:41pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 3:57pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 3:53pm:

Emma wrote on Feb 24^th, 2012 at 9:09pm:

Happily I wasn't lurking around where these images/since deleted . .. appeared.

I tend to agree with AA. If truly disturbing images are to be posted, in a relevant context. a fair thing would be the consideration of a warning beforehand.!

I won't speak for anyone else on this - just myself.

If the pictures are of butchered and mangled women and children... ...I can only assume one of the male supremacist types posted them. To score some point puerile point. no doubt.!!
SHAME ON YOU.

I don't need to see such things FROM YOU.. U R sole. whichever one of the suspects! Angry

you are.
I say to the mods/ Perc. now. if you consider this was ( 'cos I didn't see it) beyond the pale.. ban for a period of time. This sort of useage for shock value is almost an assault.!

So IM GLAD I MISSED IT.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Very glad.

So, how should the war against the war economy be fought then?

The economy is not powerful if we choose not to use it.

How does one choose not to use the economy?

Do you not use the economy?

keyword 'we'

It's a bit like choosing not to breathe. You probably can do it if you dont mind dying.

Back to top

IP Logged

bobbythefap1

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #68 - May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:53pm

borntorule wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:43pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:42pm:

FriYAY wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:41pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 3:57pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 3:53pm:

Emma wrote on Feb 24^th, 2012 at 9:09pm:

Happily I wasn't lurking around where these images/since deleted . .. appeared.

I tend to agree with AA. If truly disturbing images are to be posted, in a relevant context. a fair thing would be the consideration of a warning beforehand.!

I won't speak for anyone else on this - just myself.

If the pictures are of butchered and mangled women and children... ...I can only assume one of the male supremacist types posted them. To score some point puerile point. no doubt.!!
SHAME ON YOU.

I don't need to see such things FROM YOU.. U R sole. whichever one of the suspects! Angry

you are.
I say to the mods/ Perc. now. if you consider this was ( 'cos I didn't see it) beyond the pale.. ban for a period of time. This sort of useage for shock value is almost an assault.!

So IM GLAD I MISSED IT.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Very glad.

So, how should the war against the war economy be fought then?

The economy is not powerful if we choose not to use it.

How does one choose not to use the economy?

Do you not use the economy?

keyword 'we'

It's a bit like choosing not to breathe. You probably can do it if you dont mind dying.

What can I say to this apart from you are an idiot

Back to top

A day without sunshine is like night.

IP Logged

Gist

Gold Member

Offline

I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #69 - May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:53pm

borntorule wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:39pm:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1335867472

the pictures on the last post here are offensive. Exactly what standards are there for photos if this is permissible. The same person also posted WTC photos of people jumping out. Surely, this is not acceptable particularly on a politics board.

*tsk* An ex-mod who doesn't understand how to go about getting the mods attention. No wonder you were such a failure. Roll Eyes

Back to top

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)

IP Logged

bobbythefap1

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #70 - May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:55pm

Gist wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:53pm:

borntorule wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:39pm:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1335867472

the pictures on the last post here are offensive. Exactly what standards are there for photos if this is permissible. The same person also posted WTC photos of people jumping out. Surely, this is not acceptable particularly on a politics board.

*tsk* An ex-mod who doesn't understand how to go about getting the mods attention. No wonder you were such a failure. Roll Eyes

Borntorule was a mod?

Back to top

A day without sunshine is like night.

IP Logged

Gist

Gold Member

Offline

I am not a sock, I am
a human being!

Posts: 5476

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #71 - May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:56pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:55pm:

Gist wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:53pm:

borntorule wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:39pm:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1335867472

the pictures on the last post here are offensive. Exactly what standards are there for photos if this is permissible. The same person also posted WTC photos of people jumping out. Surely, this is not acceptable particularly on a politics board.

*tsk* An ex-mod who doesn't understand how to go about getting the mods attention. No wonder you were such a failure. Roll Eyes

Borntorule was a mod?

You probably know him better by one of his alternative names - longweekend, longloser, longwhine, ...

Back to top

"When our military goes to war it should be for purposes and objectives clearly in Australia’s interests, not merely because the Americans want some company" - Malcolm Fraser (2012 Whitlam Oration)

IP Logged

bobbythefap1

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7026
Listen now to the rain

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #72 - May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:59pm

Gist wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:56pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:55pm:

Gist wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:53pm:

borntorule wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:39pm:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1335867472

the pictures on the last post here are offensive. Exactly what standards are there for photos if this is permissible. The same person also posted WTC photos of people jumping out. Surely, this is not acceptable particularly on a politics board.

*tsk* An ex-mod who doesn't understand how to go about getting the mods attention. No wonder you were such a failure. Roll Eyes

Borntorule was a mod?

You probably know him better by one of his alternative names - longweekend, longloser, longwhine, ...

Why does the pussy need to keep using aliases?

Back to top

A day without sunshine is like night.

IP Logged

borntorule

Full Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 135
Gender: male

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #73 - May 3^rd, 2012 at 5:08pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:55pm:

Gist wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:53pm:

borntorule wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:39pm:

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1335867472

the pictures on the last post here are offensive. Exactly what standards are there for photos if this is permissible. The same person also posted WTC photos of people jumping out. Surely, this is not acceptable particularly on a politics board.

*tsk* An ex-mod who doesn't understand how to go about getting the mods attention. No wonder you were such a failure. Roll Eyes

Borntorule was a mod?

No. It sounds like one of the rather lamentable and regular complaints by the simple-minded that it is not possible for two people to post and agree without one being a 'sock'. I recall a person on another site pretty much saying that all of the conservative posters were the same person. It gets a bit old after a while.

And apparently violent and explicit off-topic photos are of huge value on a political forum because...

(this is where you add some comments or even the rare original thought...)

Back to top

IP Logged

borntorule

Full Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 135
Gender: male

Re: Explicit Pictures
Reply #74 - May 3^rd, 2012 at 5:09pm

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:53pm:

borntorule wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:43pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:42pm:

FriYAY wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 4:41pm:

bobbythefap1 wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 3:57pm:

BatteriesNotIncluded wrote on May 3^rd, 2012 at 3:53pm:

Emma wrote on Feb 24^th, 2012 at 9:09pm:

Happily I wasn't lurking around where these images/since deleted . .. appeared.

I tend to agree with AA. If truly disturbing images are to be posted, in a relevant context. a fair thing would be the consideration of a warning beforehand.!

I won't speak for anyone else on this - just myself.

If the pictures are of butchered and mangled women and children... ...I can only assume one of the male supremacist types posted them. To score some point puerile point. no doubt.!!
SHAME ON YOU.

I don't need to see such things FROM YOU.. U R sole. whichever one of the suspects! Angry

you are.
I say to the mods/ Perc. now. if you consider this was ( 'cos I didn't see it) beyond the pale.. ban for a period of time. This sort of useage for shock value is almost an assault.!

So IM GLAD I MISSED IT.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Very glad.

So, how should the war against the war economy be fought then?

The economy is not powerful if we choose not to use it.

How does one choose not to use the economy?

Do you not use the economy?

keyword 'we'

It's a bit like choosing not to breathe. You probably can do it if you dont mind dying.

What can I say to this apart from you are an idiot

What makes you think that you can NOT use 'the economy'. How exactly do you think that works out in real life?

Back to top

IP Logged