Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 18
th, 2012 at 12:06pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Feb 18
th, 2012 at 12:02pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Feb 18
th, 2012 at 11:44am:
Work Choices was not taken to an election Howard just forced it onto us while he controlled the Senate and the house of Representatives....No debate or chance to amend the legislation it was just a piece of dirty work supported by the Coalition of whom most now sit on the opposition front bench.....Now you lot complain because your election bribes are being cut back to support the integrity of the budget....It is fiscally responsible to means test assistance where Howard was reckless and grubby to buy votes!!!
Work Choices anyone????
C'mon you lot....If you condemn the health care rebate then how do you justify Work Choices???
I totally supported workchoices.
It was about bringing the employer and the employee into more direct contact to best suit the new global market place.
It was about restricting the interference of third parties in the employment process.
I have had an employment contract all my working life in the roles I have had.
I am yet to work for a company with smaller revenue than $3.5bn.
So if you are worried about level playing fields - you'd hardly call me and the employer in the same ballpark would you?
But it works fine.
I tend to get market rate - which everyone else should anyway.
Workchoices was about getting a more fluid workforce and cutting red tape to enable employers to respond to global market pressures easier.
it was a good idea - and the Unions just chucked mud at it because they could see it would end their gravy train.
So its only dishonest if it fails the Andrei test of being a good idea.
You seem to have a disconnect between understanding the point and what you like, seems it is only dishonest to not tell the truth if you don't like the policy the lie is based on.
Before the 2004 election when asked Mr Howard said there was no plan to make significant changes in IR.
After he had a senate majority we got workchoices, exactly the same as how we got a fixed price on carbon except Gillard’s hand was forced and the Liberals just chose to do what they had always wanted to.
If you look at means testing the rebate she said the rebate would stay and it is in fact still there, nobody said it would never ever get tweaked.