Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 15
th, 2012 at 10:11pm:
Kat wrote on Feb 15
th, 2012 at 10:05pm:
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Feb 15
th, 2012 at 9:49pm:
Phallic Baldwin wrote on Feb 15
th, 2012 at 9:43pm:
Only just caught onto this whole thing now, but why is removing the rebate a good thing? Given the current state of the public health system I would have thought anything to relieve the pressure off public hospitals would be a good thing?
Exactly.
This has
NOTHING
to do with helping the public health system.
It has
EVERYTHING
to do with Labor's burning hatred of the middle income bracket.
In the words of the late Eric Morecombe....
*Private healthcare rebate
*Superannuations offset cut
*Baby bonus means tested
*First Homebuyer grant restriction
* Giving out $1,000 to the lower people and excluding those over $100k
Notice which demographic are hit by all this??
Yep those of us in the middle.
The people who pay tax to support the likes of the welfare bludgers that Labor love to help so much.
And EVERY BIT of it is WEALTHFARE.
YOU are rich enough to not NEED it, so YOU shouldn't GET it.
And if it hadn't been for Howard buying votes, you would never
have HAD nit in the first place.
ALL wealthfare should be means-tested, and the cutoff point
should be well below what you claim to earn.
And the money saved should go to the WELfare
recipients that you despise so much.