BigOl64 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2012 at 4:41pm:





Big boy,
Nail has given exhaustive evidence for all his writings -
especially electric cars.
As for being churlish - you're the one who is rude & vulgar.

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 9^th, 2012 at 6:10pm:



So, in your mind, not having a NEED for, or not being able to AFFORD, or providing NO solid benefit is not a valid argument for not entering, sorry re-entering the space program. (sorry about the triple negative, i know easy it is to confuse you)

Most normal people would consider that a very solid argument, well except you and fist puppet.

I see it's still only you and puppet who have voted yes to the Aussie Moon Base. 

I drive a Jeep because I like the Jeep and I can afford the fuel costs, I don't need to scrimp and save to fill my tank, that naturally comes with earning decent money.

But you keep whinging the good whinge, ya loser

Bobby. wrote on Feb 9^th, 2012 at 6:55pm:



Yeah Fist Puppet, that's not what churlish means and neither does repeating ones opinion over and over define 'exhaustive evidence'.


Looks like you losers did get one single other person to agree with you, well worth the effort put in; kudos to you and nails. 

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 10^th, 2012 at 6:57am:


And what was your solution to the rising cost of fossil fools ??

You had no solution and you still think you won the argument LOL

"Leave the hi-techy things to china" you said.  Maybe you can offer china your great visionary advice in exchange for their "hi-techy things". What a f.cken deadbeat you are You musty be a public servant of some sort !!

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 11^th, 2012 at 7:08am:


That's because the ones who voted no are visionary vacuum's and technical ignoramuses who think that a job in the public service counting windows is a mark of success

CIA fears Iran has data downed drone failed to dump

A comprehensive CIA investigation reportedly fails to find the cause of the US drone going down in Iran last year, raising fears that the aircraft failed to dump sensitive data.

FOX News quoted a former intelligence official as saying that CIA's comprehensive, 10-week review was unable to replicate the “malfunction” that brought down the RQ-170 Sentinel drone in Iran.

The report supports Iran’s claims that the reconnaissance was cyberjacked by the army’s electronic warfare unit and eased to a safe landing while deep in Iranian territory on December 4.

Washington originally denied the loss of the drone before changing its story and insisting that contact was lost with the aircraft during a surveillance mission over neighboring Afghanistan.

“Investigators were focusing on how to prevent a repeat of the incident in the future, but without the hardware or the drone - Iran refused to return it - those efforts have been frustrated,” the report added.

US President Barack Obama finally broke his silence on the issue on December 12 and announced that Washington had asked Tehran to return the drone.

“We've asked for it back. We'll see how the Iranians respond,” Obama said.

Iran, however, responded that the drone is now its “national asset” and had undertaken reverse engineering procedures on the US spy plane. Tehran said it had necessary technology to decode the captured US drone's data and documents.

http://www.presstv.com/detail/226024.html

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 11^th, 2012 at 12:44pm:



And, even though, you aren't smart enough to accept or understand it, the same reason applies to both those things....

And that answer is, there isn't enough financial return involved to justify the expenditure....