Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print
Andrew Bolt does what Gillard asks us - start with (Read 8729 times)
Dsmithy70
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ire futuis vobismetipsis

Posts: 13147
Newy
Gender: male
Re: Andrew Bolt does what Gillard asks us - start with
Reply #45 - Oct 10th, 2011 at 2:33pm
 
philperth2010 wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 2:28pm:
The problem with Abbott supporters is none of them will debate the Coalitions direct action policy.....They carry on about the carbon tax without accepting the Coalition's climate policy is a very bad joke that has no chance of achieving our targets.....Until we start dealing with reality and debate the Coalitions alternative policy we are allowing Tony Abbott to avoid scrutiny....The carbon tax may not be perfect but it is decades ahead of Abbott's no action policy.....Only the very stupid would accept Abbott's policy has any chance of success!!!

Angry

The real distinction is between those who adapt their purposes to reality and those who seek to mold reality in the light of their purposes.
Henry Kissinger (1923 - )



Verge is the only one with the guts to face the truth.
Then again I always found him reasonable & don't consider him part of the cheersquad

Quote:
Re: Carbon Tax will cost Australia $1 TRILLION
Reply #34 - Oct 7th, 2011, 8:44pm

A carbon tax I think is unnecessary as cutting waste in government expenditure could cover such programs.

That said Abbotts plan is just reckless.

If I have to pick between the two, Im gonna take the tax, very very begrudgingly.
Back to top
 

REBELLION is not what most people think it is.
REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself.
Gavin Nascimento
 
IP Logged
 
culldav
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2020
Re: Andrew Bolt does what Gillard asks us - start with
Reply #46 - Oct 10th, 2011 at 3:31pm
 
Any normal Aussies who pays income tax who thinks this carbon tax will be a good thing is secretly masturbating over Labor.

This carbon tax is the mining tax in disguise, and some of you cannot see it, because you are so blinded by your environmental cause.

Two good friends of mine have already transported their manufacturing business to Indonesia to escape to carbon tax charges - loss of Aussies Jobs 290 and all other benefits.  They are just going to use one factory in Australia as a distribution centre.

2 Aussie businesses already gone from Australia thanks to greedy Gillard and her Green clowns.  Way to go Jules, now run in a buy me another schooner love or I’ll gave ya arse a slap, now that’s a good girl!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
FriYAY
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7395
Re: Andrew Bolt does what Gillard asks us - start with
Reply #47 - Oct 10th, 2011 at 3:38pm
 
philperth2010 wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 2:28pm:
The problem with Abbott supporters is none of them will debate the Coalitions direct action policy..........Only the very stupid would accept Abbott's policy has any chance of success!!!

Angry

The real distinction is between those who adapt their purposes to reality and those who seek to mold reality in the light of their purposes.
Henry Kissinger (1923 - )


Why would someone debate something you obviously don't think will work?

Never let your persistence and passion turn into stubbornness and ignorance.
Anthony J. D'Angelo
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dsmithy70
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ire futuis vobismetipsis

Posts: 13147
Newy
Gender: male
Re: Andrew Bolt does what Gillard asks us - start with
Reply #48 - Oct 10th, 2011 at 3:45pm
 
culldav wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 3:31pm:
Any normal Aussies who pays income tax who thinks this carbon tax will be a good thing is secretly masturbating over Labor.

This carbon tax is the mining tax in disguise, and some of you cannot see it, because you are so blinded by your environmental cause.

Two good friends of mine have already transported their manufacturing business to Indonesia to escape to carbon tax charges - loss of Aussies Jobs 290 and all other benefits.  They are just going to use one factory in Australia as a distribution centre.

2 Aussie businesses already gone from Australia thanks to greedy Gillard and her Green clowns.  Way to go Jules, now run in a buy me another schooner love or I’ll gave ya arse a slap, now that’s a good girl!!


Sorry that sounds like propaganda nothing more.
Your mates moved off shore to avoid a carbon tax of $23 p/tonne "BULLSH!T", your mates are not in the top 500 companies otherwise the job losses would be much higher.
Sorry but the flow on effects are not yet known exposed industry gets compo, punters get compo why would you move when circimstances are not yet known?
Secondly moving a business offshore is not a simple task planning, would have been in the works before the last election, sorry your mates moved to take advantage of low paid workers to increase their bottom line via wage cuts, nothing more, the carbon tax is just an easy out, to tell you so you mightn't think they are miserable arseholes which in fact they are.
Back to top
 

REBELLION is not what most people think it is.
REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself.
Gavin Nascimento
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Andrew Bolt does what Gillard asks us - start with
Reply #49 - Oct 10th, 2011 at 5:37pm
 
Dsmithy70 wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 10:25am:
culldav wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 10:22am:
cods wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 10:03am:
Dsmithy70 wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 9:55am:
how do you know?
I don't need to be told the reasons for a tax on polluters, it's self evident to me.




so what was the cause say a million years ago when all the ice melted and the world flooded..

what was the cause of the dinosaur disappearing..

sweet mysteries..

we can argue till  forever.. but it isnt a given that man is to blame.. and a TAX will be the cure.. it really isnt..

if the boom does a bust... well it could and it will..

what then with this TAX?.. what then for the planet?

its a circus as far as I am concerned and I believe industry is improving itself..

my god when a govt has to drag up pictures of Power Stations that went out of business years ago... something isnt quite right for me.




You cannot blame Gillard or the Government anymore, its the stupid people that agree to being taxed for nothing that are the problem.

Lets see how much of this carbon tax money actually gets spent on renewable sustainable energy; reckon the majority will go to paying back the nations debt.  

Aussies really are the stupidest people on the planet right now, Rudd failed to introduce a mining tax and now gillard is just about to introduce a carbon tax that will help NOTHING.  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Looking at whats happening now and the drastic fall in the IQ's of Australians we are so glad we sent out kids to get a proper education in Europe, and not be educated by backward hillbillies.  Embarrassed Embarrassed



Im not being taxed polluters are
I have to pay to pollute every 3 months when my council rates come in
ie garbage collection.
Why should companies be able to dump for free & not me?


its not even close to the same thing. your argument, as weka as it is, requires Co2 to be classed as a pollutant which it clearly is not.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
culldav
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2020
Re: Andrew Bolt does what Gillard asks us - start with
Reply #50 - Oct 10th, 2011 at 5:59pm
 
Dsmithy70 wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 3:45pm:
culldav wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 3:31pm:
Any normal Aussies who pays income tax who thinks this carbon tax will be a good thing is secretly masturbating over Labor.

This carbon tax is the mining tax in disguise, and some of you cannot see it, because you are so blinded by your environmental cause.

Two good friends of mine have already transported their manufacturing business to Indonesia to escape to carbon tax charges - loss of Aussies Jobs 290 and all other benefits.  They are just going to use one factory in Australia as a distribution centre.

2 Aussie businesses already gone from Australia thanks to greedy Gillard and her Green clowns.  Way to go Jules, now run in a buy me another schooner love or I’ll gave ya arse a slap, now that’s a good girl!!


Sorry that sounds like propaganda nothing more.
Your mates moved off shore to avoid a carbon tax of $23 p/tonne "BULLSH!T", your mates are not in the top 500 companies otherwise the job losses would be much higher.
Sorry but the flow on effects are not yet known exposed industry gets compo, punters get compo why would you move when circimstances are not yet known?
Secondly moving a business offshore is not a simple task planning, would have been in the works before the last election, sorry your mates moved to take advantage of low paid workers to increase their bottom line via wage cuts, nothing more, the carbon tax is just an easy out, to tell you so you mightn't think they are miserable arseholes which in fact they are.




What many Australians don’t understand including the Prime Minister Julia Gillard and her clown brigade is: many countries welcome and encourage development in their countries, especially when it involves employment for its citizens, and Indonesia is one of these countries who go out of their way to welcome and encourage new business opportunities by reducing “red-tape”. 

You might be amazed to know that from start to end the whole process for both these businesses has only taken 10 months to arrange and develop.

Indonesia understand that employment for their people and manufacturing for there country is far more important than trying to impose some “make-believe” carbon tax on your people.  My friends are not greedy miserable arseholes trying to take advantage of a lower socio-economic country and its people by moving their businesses over to Indonesia. They have done so because the prime Minister of Australia is a deceitful bloody LIAR, and is trying to implement a tax that will do nothing to help fix global environmental problems.   

If want to believe that Gillard pissing on your leg is rain, then that’s your prerogative, but don’t be mad at other people for recognising piss is piss and not rain.

Write to Juliar and ask her what she is going to spend ALL the tax money on - you might just be surprise at the answer.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dsmithy70
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ire futuis vobismetipsis

Posts: 13147
Newy
Gender: male
Re: Andrew Bolt does what Gillard asks us - start with
Reply #51 - Oct 10th, 2011 at 6:09pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 5:37pm:
Dsmithy70 wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 10:25am:
culldav wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 10:22am:
cods wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 10:03am:
Dsmithy70 wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 9:55am:
how do you know?
I don't need to be told the reasons for a tax on polluters, it's self evident to me.




so what was the cause say a million years ago when all the ice melted and the world flooded..

what was the cause of the dinosaur disappearing..

sweet mysteries..

we can argue till  forever.. but it isnt a given that man is to blame.. and a TAX will be the cure.. it really isnt..

if the boom does a bust... well it could and it will..

what then with this TAX?.. what then for the planet?

its a circus as far as I am concerned and I believe industry is improving itself..

my god when a govt has to drag up pictures of Power Stations that went out of business years ago... something isnt quite right for me.




You cannot blame Gillard or the Government anymore, its the stupid people that agree to being taxed for nothing that are the problem.

Lets see how much of this carbon tax money actually gets spent on renewable sustainable energy; reckon the majority will go to paying back the nations debt.  

Aussies really are the stupidest people on the planet right now, Rudd failed to introduce a mining tax and now gillard is just about to introduce a carbon tax that will help NOTHING.  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Looking at whats happening now and the drastic fall in the IQ's of Australians we are so glad we sent out kids to get a proper education in Europe, and not be educated by backward hillbillies.  Embarrassed Embarrassed



Im not being taxed polluters are
I have to pay to pollute every 3 months when my council rates come in
ie garbage collection.
Why should companies be able to dump for free & not me?


its not even close to the same thing. your argument, as weka as it is, requires Co2 to be classed as a pollutant which it clearly is not.


No CO2 is not a pollutant if it remains in balance, the point is it now is not.
Seriously do you believe we can just burn all that carbon within coal and it just disappears?
Anyway I think I've covered my POV on the subject an it doesn't require this circular argument.
Back to top
 

REBELLION is not what most people think it is.
REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself.
Gavin Nascimento
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Andrew Bolt does what Gillard asks us - start with
Reply #52 - Oct 10th, 2011 at 6:28pm
 
Quote:
No CO2 is not a pollutant if it remains in balance, the point is it now is not.


hat is an assumption not a fact. despite CO2 continueing to increase over the last 10 years, temperatures have not. the supposed correlation of CO2 and temperature simply fails to materialise. ice ages occured with higher concentrations. warm periods had less and so on. CO2 concentration is not a driver of temperature and is more likely to be a result of it.

Im not being a denier. Im sceptical of the science because it keeps changing all the time. the predictions keep changing dramatically and in the meantime, temperatures have not exceeded normal climatic variations. 500 years ago you could sail around the north of Greenland. now you cant. what happened then?

nope. Co 2 is not the pollutant it is claimed to be. for goodness sake... FOOD one of our more pressing needs grows better in a CO2 rich environment.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
Dsmithy70
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ire futuis vobismetipsis

Posts: 13147
Newy
Gender: male
Re: Andrew Bolt does what Gillard asks us - start with
Reply #53 - Oct 10th, 2011 at 6:58pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 6:28pm:
Quote:
No CO2 is not a pollutant if it remains in balance, the point is it now is not.


hat is an assumption not a fact. despite CO2 continueing to increase over the last 10 years, temperatures have not. the supposed correlation of CO2 and temperature simply fails to materialise. ice ages occured with higher concentrations. warm periods had less and so on. CO2 concentration is not a driver of temperature and is more likely to be a result of it.

Im not being a denier. Im sceptical of the science because it keeps changing all the time. the predictions keep changing dramatically and in the meantime, temperatures have not exceeded normal climatic variations. 500 years ago you could sail around the north of Greenland. now you cant. what happened then?

nope. Co 2 is not the pollutant it is claimed to be. for goodness sake... FOOD one of our more pressing needs grows better in a CO2 rich environment.


Like I said my argument that changing from finite polluting resources to renewable non polluting ones must be a good thing.
I fail to see how you cannot accept that other than the monetary reason.
Run the exxon CO2 plant crap all you want, an argument BTW that they themselves have abandoned
Back to top
 

REBELLION is not what most people think it is.
REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself.
Gavin Nascimento
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Andrew Bolt does what Gillard asks us - start with
Reply #54 - Oct 11th, 2011 at 7:52am
 
Dsmithy70 wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 6:58pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 6:28pm:
Quote:
No CO2 is not a pollutant if it remains in balance, the point is it now is not.


hat is an assumption not a fact. despite CO2 continueing to increase over the last 10 years, temperatures have not. the supposed correlation of CO2 and temperature simply fails to materialise. ice ages occured with higher concentrations. warm periods had less and so on. CO2 concentration is not a driver of temperature and is more likely to be a result of it.

Im not being a denier. Im sceptical of the science because it keeps changing all the time. the predictions keep changing dramatically and in the meantime, temperatures have not exceeded normal climatic variations. 500 years ago you could sail around the north of Greenland. now you cant. what happened then?

nope. Co 2 is not the pollutant it is claimed to be. for goodness sake... FOOD one of our more pressing needs grows better in a CO2 rich environment.


Like I said my argument that changing from finite polluting resources to renewable non polluting ones must be a good thing.
I fail to see how you cannot accept that other than the monetary reason.
Run the exxon CO2 plant crap all you want, an argument BTW that they themselves have abandoned


I too think that is a great idea. but that's not the argument, is it? the carbon tax isnt about renewable energy and never was. Thats a sideshow. if we were seriousl about R/E/ we would fund it and support it properly not using some ad hoc tax that maty or may not happen.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
chicken_lipsforme
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7090
Townsville NQ
Gender: male
Re: Andrew Bolt does what Gillard asks us - start with
Reply #55 - Oct 11th, 2011 at 8:00am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 11th, 2011 at 7:52am:
Dsmithy70 wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 6:58pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 6:28pm:
Quote:
No CO2 is not a pollutant if it remains in balance, the point is it now is not.


hat is an assumption not a fact. despite CO2 continueing to increase over the last 10 years, temperatures have not. the supposed correlation of CO2 and temperature simply fails to materialise. ice ages occured with higher concentrations. warm periods had less and so on. CO2 concentration is not a driver of temperature and is more likely to be a result of it.

Im not being a denier. Im sceptical of the science because it keeps changing all the time. the predictions keep changing dramatically and in the meantime, temperatures have not exceeded normal climatic variations. 500 years ago you could sail around the north of Greenland. now you cant. what happened then?

nope. Co 2 is not the pollutant it is claimed to be. for goodness sake... FOOD one of our more pressing needs grows better in a CO2 rich environment.


Like I said my argument that changing from finite polluting resources to renewable non polluting ones must be a good thing.
I fail to see how you cannot accept that other than the monetary reason.
Run the exxon CO2 plant crap all you want, an argument BTW that they themselves have abandoned


I too think that is a great idea. but that's not the argument, is it? the carbon tax isnt about renewable energy and never was. Thats a sideshow. if we were seriousl about R/E/ we would fund it and support it properly not using some ad hoc tax that maty or may not happen.


That's true, however we might be waiting awhile for a federal government to fund it beyond the occasional grant or two.
I suggest the government would see this ongoing investment in renewables as a private industry function and not part of a governments core business.
Back to top
 

"Another boat, another policy failure from the Howard government"

Julia Gillard
Shadow Health Minister
2003.
 
IP Logged
 
Dsmithy70
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ire futuis vobismetipsis

Posts: 13147
Newy
Gender: male
Re: Andrew Bolt does what Gillard asks us - start with
Reply #56 - Oct 11th, 2011 at 10:06am
 
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 11th, 2011 at 7:52am:
Dsmithy70 wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 6:58pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 6:28pm:
Quote:
No CO2 is not a pollutant if it remains in balance, the point is it now is not.


hat is an assumption not a fact. despite CO2 continueing to increase over the last 10 years, temperatures have not. the supposed correlation of CO2 and temperature simply fails to materialise. ice ages occured with higher concentrations. warm periods had less and so on. CO2 concentration is not a driver of temperature and is more likely to be a result of it.

Im not being a denier. Im sceptical of the science because it keeps changing all the time. the predictions keep changing dramatically and in the meantime, temperatures have not exceeded normal climatic variations. 500 years ago you could sail around the north of Greenland. now you cant. what happened then?

nope. Co 2 is not the pollutant it is claimed to be. for goodness sake... FOOD one of our more pressing needs grows better in a CO2 rich environment.


Like I said my argument that changing from finite polluting resources to renewable non polluting ones must be a good thing.
I fail to see how you cannot accept that other than the monetary reason.
Run the exxon CO2 plant crap all you want, an argument BTW that they themselves have abandoned


I too think that is a great idea. but that's not the argument, is it? the carbon tax isnt about renewable energy and never was. Thats a sideshow. if we were seriousl about R/E/ we would fund it and support it properly not using some ad hoc tax that maty or may not happen.


It has become a sideshow just as vested interested wished & this continuing argument on how to price Carbon just plays right into their hands.
Frankly it was probably an oil company that 1st suggested CO2 was warming the planet.
Back to top
 

REBELLION is not what most people think it is.
REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself.
Gavin Nascimento
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21097
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Andrew Bolt does what Gillard asks us - start with
Reply #57 - Oct 11th, 2011 at 11:17am
 
FriYAY wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 3:38pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 2:28pm:
The problem with Abbott supporters is none of them will debate the Coalitions direct action policy..........Only the very stupid would accept Abbott's policy has any chance of success!!!

Angry

The real distinction is between those who adapt their purposes to reality and those who seek to mold reality in the light of their purposes.
Henry Kissinger (1923 - )


Why would someone debate something you obviously don't think will work?

Never let your persistence and passion turn into stubbornness and ignorance.
Anthony J. D'Angelo


We could debate the issue so you could prove me wrong and show me up as a person of no substance.....I relish the opportunity....any takers???

Smiley
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Andrew Bolt does what Gillard asks us - start with
Reply #58 - Oct 11th, 2011 at 11:29am
 
philperth2010 wrote on Oct 11th, 2011 at 11:17am:
FriYAY wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 3:38pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 2:28pm:
The problem with Abbott supporters is none of them will debate the Coalitions direct action policy..........Only the very stupid would accept Abbott's policy has any chance of success!!!

Angry

The real distinction is between those who adapt their purposes to reality and those who seek to mold reality in the light of their purposes.
Henry Kissinger (1923 - )


Why would someone debate something you obviously don't think will work?

Never let your persistence and passion turn into stubbornness and ignorance.
Anthony J. D'Angelo


We could debate the issue so you could prove me wrong and show me up as a person of no substance.....I relish the opportunity....any takers???

Smiley


will direct action work? dont know. will carbon tax work? definately not.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21097
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Andrew Bolt does what Gillard asks us - start with
Reply #59 - Oct 11th, 2011 at 12:15pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Oct 11th, 2011 at 11:29am:
philperth2010 wrote on Oct 11th, 2011 at 11:17am:
FriYAY wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 3:38pm:
philperth2010 wrote on Oct 10th, 2011 at 2:28pm:
The problem with Abbott supporters is none of them will debate the Coalitions direct action policy..........Only the very stupid would accept Abbott's policy has any chance of success!!!

Angry

The real distinction is between those who adapt their purposes to reality and those who seek to mold reality in the light of their purposes.
Henry Kissinger (1923 - )


Why would someone debate something you obviously don't think will work?

Never let your persistence and passion turn into stubbornness and ignorance.
Anthony J. D'Angelo


We could debate the issue so you could prove me wrong and show me up as a person of no substance.....I relish the opportunity....any takers???

Smiley


will direct action work? dont know. will carbon tax work? definately not.



No....not as it is at the moment.....60% of the Coalition's reductions will come from storing carbon in soil......The Coalition have used unproven science to reach this % and cannot guarantee the technology will be accepted towards agreed targets.....So I can tell you that the Coalitions direct action policy cannot work as it stands.....Even if storing carbon in soil is accepted towards agreed targets the science is still unproven!!!

Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print